Which reminds me of a question I've thought about for ages, but not been knowledgeable/smart enough to answer - if teams/riders are aware that retroactive testing may occur and snare them in future, what's their thought process:armchairclimber said:When they do perfect a workable test (and safe endogenous levels have been set), it should still be possible to retrospectively test old samples. If SKY or anyone else have been using, they will, eventually, be found out.
a) we may get caught in the future, but let's just go for the short-term gain
b) nah, they probably won't develop a test
c) nah, they might catch us but probably won't prosecute us
d) we're not REALLY cheating by doing this, so how can we be caught
I guess I'm mistakenly assuming there is a thought process.