bigcog said:
Isn't it a carcinogen although I suppose some people won't be put off by that and I was under the impression that they had a test for this for quite some years, is that not the case ?
The GW1516 is the carcinogenic one - the AICAR is, if anything, anti-neoplastic and has been used in cancer research to inhibit tumor growth
GW1516 is super-risky because it induces lots of cancers in laboratory animals in high doses, and there is no reason to believe it would be safe for human use
Both the AICAR and the GW1516 were put on the banned list before there were even tests for them -
GW1516 detection in blood was perfected first , there was an AICAR test approved in 2015, and the methods for AICAR testing, are getting better - it's a hard one because it occurs naturally in the human body so there has to be detection of exogenous AICAR.
Nobody has ever been sanctioned for AICAR as a result of testing - shows that the methods / implementation are still weak. Found this one case which was non-analytical :
https://www.usada.org/abdelmounaim-harroufi-receives-doping-sanction/
A track runner got banned in 2017 because people found AICAR in his possession and he admitted that he was taking it