Re: Re:
Basically this pointless discussion "he will win - he will not win" is simply a continuation of the "Landa was the best climber" narrative which they upheld even though pretty much everyone agreed on that. Although it should be said that, as i said before the Giro his approach to the double, in the race, will probably be different and more in tune with Indurains advice: "spend your energy at the right time and in the right place". Therefore we didnt saw a Contador attacking everything and everytime in the later stages of the Giro. It is likely we'll see a rather conservative approach in France as well with a different ambition then impress on Sky-fans and haters going uphill. I'd say experience and tactical nouse is clearly in his favour over the others. Two key factors often forgotten and overlooked.
Still they will continue like this until the race and (i say "if") if he should win it the gates will open for another discussion with ambition to downplay his victory and how he was not the best racer because he didnt win in a sprint. Some people makes a habit of being wrong all the time but at least they dont feel ashamed and continue to the post like the predicitions before the Giro never happened. One can admire such confidence.
cellardoor said:No_Balls said:That awkard moment when the summary is even worse then the previous post.
The general gist is this: When Contador pulls out of the Tour after losing 20 mins on the first mountain stage, it's not because he's tired from the Giro, but because that's just where his form is these days.
Basically this pointless discussion "he will win - he will not win" is simply a continuation of the "Landa was the best climber" narrative which they upheld even though pretty much everyone agreed on that. Although it should be said that, as i said before the Giro his approach to the double, in the race, will probably be different and more in tune with Indurains advice: "spend your energy at the right time and in the right place". Therefore we didnt saw a Contador attacking everything and everytime in the later stages of the Giro. It is likely we'll see a rather conservative approach in France as well with a different ambition then impress on Sky-fans and haters going uphill. I'd say experience and tactical nouse is clearly in his favour over the others. Two key factors often forgotten and overlooked.
Still they will continue like this until the race and (i say "if") if he should win it the gates will open for another discussion with ambition to downplay his victory and how he was not the best racer because he didnt win in a sprint. Some people makes a habit of being wrong all the time but at least they dont feel ashamed and continue to the post like the predicitions before the Giro never happened. One can admire such confidence.