Taxus4a said:
What we show at the Vuelta was that Contador got a very good preparation as he rode 8 days in le Tour, rest 2 weeks and train for one month previous la Vuelta.
What we saw in la Vuelta is that he lied about his participation and his injuries and his shape, with the help of the media.
What we saw in la Vuelta is that Froome said he was there just thinking in this Tour, becouse he needed a complete GT in his legs in 2015.
He was trying to win last years Vuelta. If he hadn't been trying, he wouldn't have been 2nd.
What we saw in la Vuelta is that Froome did a mistake in the ITT and he started too strong, exploded, losed time an later he did better in the last Km that Contador. Uran was better than Contador and clearly better than Froome (in time) so it was not a super performance from Contador, but not the normal one by Froome.
Knowing how to time your effort in a itt is part of racing. It doesn't change the fact that Contador beat Froome. Just except that. Also losing to Uran isn't something to be ashamed of. His itt was pretty good in 2014.
Whay we show in la Vuelta is that he needed to attack and put time, and Contador was in a similar strengh, and he has a better aceleration, so difficult to drop Contador.
What we saw is that, that way Froome dopred Contador just in the steppest climbs, as Camperona, where to follow wheels is no so important.
IMO SKY didnt ride well the 2 harder mountains stages. When you are similarto Contador in strenth becouse he had a better preparation you cant just put an strong pace, even in a hard climb as Ancares, Contador need to have a previous big effort, not just final climb.
What point are you trying to make here? What we saw is that Contador (for the most part) was stronger than Froome. Froome can be beaten you know.
What we saw is that Contador was in aa great shape, but Valverde came from le Tour, to win San Sebastian, and he was close even when in the first days he was just working for Quintana and doing stupid attacks like in Cordoba and didnt take any bonus...
What are you trying to say here? Do you think Valverde could have beaten AC if he had tried harder?
It has his merit to start training in Lugano and with that determination to go to the Vuelta to win after to have a fissure in his bone, and he was at a hiogh level, he won, congrats, but if you want to believe all that stuff that Froome prepare la Vuelta at the same level that contador did, you can do it, but consider that there is another point of view of all that story...
Do you have some sort of special insight into this "story?" Why don't you share it with links to prove your point....Froome had more time to prepare for the Vuelta. He has no one but himself to blame if he didn't use that time wisely.
The story is not that Contador did the amazing thing to win la Vuelta to froome after to have an important injury just training hard a week... and for that he believe he can get the double..and he failed is becouse it very difficult.
What Contador did was pretty impressive whether you admit it or not. He came back from a pretty bad leg injury to win the Vuelta beating Froome. Sorry, I don't fully understand your wording....are you saying AC failed the double? Has the Tour finished yet?
I respect you think like that, but I like this sport, and I am going to answer to that world of lies that Contador create about his acts. He is like a wizard that know how to put people at his side...(with all the respect is what I think, and well based)
If you are the best, go to the Tour and show you are the best. if he do, he will have my congrats and all my consideration. To be close to Froome after to win il Giro could even be enough for me. But close is not 5 minutes at the end of the Tour, close is maybe not a question of time, but of performance. He wanst close to Froome (or that is not close for me) in Huy, but the Tour is long.
Yes he has duped all these people into liking him with his magic wand.

Get real dude. Do you really believe that Froome is a more honest chap?
AC has done the Tour and proved that he is the best. He is at the point in his career where winning just another Tour won't do it for him. His palmares are so impressive (compared to someone like Froome for example) that he wants to go for the Giro-Tour double to motivate himself.