Re: Re:
MortiroloForever said:
Taxus4a said:
Matteo. said:
Yeah , it's always important. But now at the end of career , i don't think winning 2 or 3 P-N it will be essential for him
But winning another Tour at 33 y.o. against people like Quintana or Froome in their best ages...meh , it' s a little bit different
Contador is in a better age than Quintana to win le Tour.
Are you sure?
For example, Indurain was retired from cycling at Contador's current age.
Gilberto Simoni, a long-lived cyclist won his last Giro d'Italia at the age of 32. He still was a big contender next 2 years (2004 & 2005, that close race against Savoldelli), but his performances were drowning down little by litlle.
I think riders mature earlier these days. Miguel Indurain won his first Tour when he was 27-28 years old. Quintana has won the Giro and he has been podium twice in Paris and he actually is 26 y.o.
You put examples of another era. I am not going to talk more about that here, if you want I can explain you in private.
Amyway you talk about Simoni and in the ame era you can find Garzelli till 40 years old, and he did his best year with 36
http://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/rider.asp?riderid=37
Zulle in the era of Induran performed his best year with 34.
But Goss has retired in fact of top level cycling, he has money...what you want to say with the age of some people retirement. there are very different examples long time ago and now.
26 years old is a very good age to face le Tour, but 33 as well, and with the advantage of the experience. 30 is the best IMO, but every rider has a different story.
Evans has won le Tour with 35 (but that is not a question of his best age, he did better performes previoulsly), Valverde has done his best result in le Tour with 34.
You can performe very well above 40 as lot of riders as Horner, Voigt, Rebellin,... has showed.