• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Alberto Contador Discussion Thread

Page 1550 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 13, 2015
165
0
0
Re:

Sciocco said:
I know he's never won Burgos but has he ever ridden it before? It wouldn't be a bad random stage race to add to the collection. A good ITT and the final stage climb...

Alberto NEVER has participated in the Tour of Burgos; is an excellent preparation for "La Vuelta" and with serious chance of winning...
Contador would have had many chances to win this Tour de France 2016.He was very unlucky.
A pity.
 
May 13, 2015
165
0
0
Alberto Contador puts the finishing touch to a unique round

http://www.ciclismodeburgos.com/index_noticia.asp?noticia=2500

La Vuelta a Burgos es consciente de la importancia que tiene esta edición para el futuro y celebra que la imagen de la ciudad y provincia se proyecte al mundo gracias a la difusión diaria que tendrá la carrera. Los canales 13TV, Televisión Castilla y León, Televisión Gallega, Euskal Telebista, L’Equipe 21, Sky y Eleven Sport Network retransmitirán en directo de 15,00 a 16,40 horas el desarrollo de cada etapa de una Vuelta a Burgos
 
Apr 22, 2012
3,570
0
0
Re: Re:

Pennino said:
But I agree that it would have looked very, very good for Alberto. Such a bloody shame.
He could fight for top five is he stayed healthy. Shame for him, it woudl be nice result.
 
Re: Re:

Kokoso said:
Pennino said:
But I agree that it would have looked very, very good for Alberto. Such a bloody shame.
He could fight for top five is he stayed healthy. Shame for him, it woudl be nice result.

Thats the most stupidest thing I've heard today (I just woke up, but still).

The level has hardly been astonishing so far. As I've said earlier, his chances would've been better than expected beforehand if not for the crash obviously.
 
Apr 22, 2012
3,570
0
0
Re: Re:

Valv.Piti said:
Kokoso said:
Pennino said:
But I agree that it would have looked very, very good for Alberto. Such a bloody shame.
He could fight for top five is he stayed healthy. Shame for him, it woudl be nice result.

Thats the most stupidest thing I've heard today (I just woke up, but still).

The level has hardly been astonishing so far. As I've said earlier, his chances would've been better than expected beforehand if not for the crash obviously.
It's all relative, you know. In his best shape ever he was 4th and opponents are the same and there are new one.
Don't use word stupid so easily. Or do you think you are the one with clever and right opinions?
 
Re: Re:

Kokoso said:
It's all relative, you know. In his best shape ever he was 4th and opponents are the same and there are new one.
Don't use word stupid so easily. Or do you think you are the one with clever and right opinions?
Of course he wasn't in his best shape ever in 2014, his numbers were well down compared to previous years.

I looked at the Tour's last week in detail a few days ago, it would have been perfect for him :(
 
Apr 22, 2012
3,570
0
0
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
Kokoso said:
It's all relative, you know. In his best shape ever he was 4th and opponents are the same and there are new one.
Don't use word stupid so easily. Or do you think you are the one with clever and right opinions?
Of course he wasn't in his best shape ever in 2014, his numbers were well down compared to previous years.

I looked at the Tour's last week in detail a few days ago, it would have been perfect for him :(
He said his numbers are best ever back than. Was he lying or what?
 
Re: Re:

Kokoso said:
LaFlorecita said:
Kokoso said:
It's all relative, you know. In his best shape ever he was 4th and opponents are the same and there are new one.
Don't use word stupid so easily. Or do you think you are the one with clever and right opinions?
Of course he wasn't in his best shape ever in 2014, his numbers were well down compared to previous years.

I looked at the Tour's last week in detail a few days ago, it would have been perfect for him :(
He said his numbers are best ever back than. Was he lying or what?
I think she was talking about 2013.
 
Jul 29, 2012
11,703
4
0
Yea i'm sure of it now, he would have crushed this tour. He's prob in tears watching how the race unfolds.

He was still a top 20 climber with breaks in his leg and a hurt shoulder.

Man oh man, i'm not sure if i'll ever get over this. I think this is even worse than tour 2014, because now his opponents were quintana and froome. Jesus.
 
Re:

Miburo said:
Yea i'm sure of it now, he would have crushed this tour. He's prob in tears watching how the race unfolds.

He was still a top 20 climber with breaks in his leg and a hurt shoulder.

Man oh man, i'm not sure if i'll ever get over this. I think this is even worse than tour 2014, because now his opponents were quintana and froome. Jesus.
Yeah he would have a great chance for victory :(
 
Jul 29, 2012
11,703
4
0
He was in perfect shape in the dauphine. His ITT this year was great, at least hilly and this ITT suits him pretty damn well.

And he would have destroyed the MTT next week. FFS, why always him in the tour cycling gods? What did the man do to deserve this? :(

Freaking mollemma was the best rider yesterday, jesus man. Fleur will never get over this, and me neither
 
Re:

Miburo said:
He was in perfect shape in the dauphine. His ITT this year was great, at least hilly and this ITT suits him pretty damn well.

And he would have destroyed the MTT next week. FFS, why always him in the tour cycling gods? What did the man do to deserve this? :(

Freaking mollemma was the best rider yesterday, jesus man. Fleur will never get over this, and me neither
I hope that at least Quintana doesn't win.But yeah once again crashing on a great form :(
 
Apr 22, 2012
3,570
0
0
Re: Re:

Forever The Best said:
Kokoso said:
LaFlorecita said:
Kokoso said:
It's all relative, you know. In his best shape ever he was 4th and opponents are the same and there are new one.
Don't use word stupid so easily. Or do you think you are the one with clever and right opinions?
Of course he wasn't in his best shape ever in 2014, his numbers were well down compared to previous years.

I looked at the Tour's last week in detail a few days ago, it would have been perfect for him :(
He said his numbers are best ever back than. Was he lying or what?
I think she was talking about 2013.
Exactly. I remember that correctly, right?

To tell your opinion is called trolling these days? Just because you disagree, or have different opininon? Guys, get your **** together, you are acting like kids.
 
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
Red Rick said:
Events, interpretations, wishes, extrapolations. Obviously, in the dream world in which we unfortunately don't live in our favourite rider always wins if only he'd stayed on his bike, hit peak shape, or yadayadayada. We won't know what would've happened, I just know that I assumed both Froome and Quintana would have been stronger compared to the rest of the field. Maybe that rest of the field is stronger. Maybe Froome couldn't bother to drop Porte and Mollema.

Only assumption I'd make is that Contador would be 'up there'. Wherever that is.

No need for froome to attack porte and mollema with no stage win available and the TT tomorrow

There was no need for him to attack with Sagan, Thomas and the other Tinkoff rider with Ventoux looming the following day but he did anyway. He had to know that he had no chance of the stage win with Sagan there. The opportunity to gain time is always a reason to attack. The fact that he and Sky are always integrating into the front of the peloton on flat sprint stages, often catching his opponents unawares and occasionally taking time should be evidence enough that he and his team are opportunists and can't be given the slight bit of rope in terms of one's attention. The slightest lack of focus could mean minutes lost.
 
Apr 22, 2012
3,570
0
0
Re:

Red Rick said:
Let's try and keep this friendly, shall we. Seems to me there's no point arguing if you're never agreeing anyway, so let's leave it at that.
I think it's better to react directly, not generally, when you are mod.
 
Re: Re:

Kokoso said:
LaFlorecita said:
Kokoso said:
It's all relative, you know. In his best shape ever he was 4th and opponents are the same and there are new one.
Don't use word stupid so easily. Or do you think you are the one with clever and right opinions?
Of course he wasn't in his best shape ever in 2014, his numbers were well down compared to previous years.

I looked at the Tour's last week in detail a few days ago, it would have been perfect for him :(
He said his numbers are best ever back than. Was he lying or what?

"Numbers" don't always equate to a stellar performance. There too many other variables that come into play. Especially at his age.