Miburo said:
Than that form?
So now you're implying Contador can get that form? I thought you always denied that.
On what do you base yourself that Froome can be better than that Contador?
Dear Miburo, look. Saying 'that form' apparently imply that Contador's superiority over the rest guys, right? I strongly disagree with such a formulation. That 6 minute advantage is a product of series of circumstances. Contador's great form was one of them, the main one, but not the only one. But you don't really care badly prepared Nibali, weak Menchov and ill Rodriguez, do you? Let's have a look at the 2012 Tour then. The competition was crushed by Sky in very similar manner. But what are you saying first? Rather! Weak field, ill Evans, miserable Menchov and so on. If based on your criterion [sentence 1], I equate Contador's the 2011 Giro form and Wiggins' and Froome's the 2012 TdF form, you will simply ridicule me, because Alberto's domination is all in the day's work whereas Sky triuph is something strange, illogical and episodic as many people hope.
Straight after the Tour I said that Froome is a climber of Contador's and Schleck's calibre, however many forum guys started ridiculing my opinion. Well, let's check.
As to that form, I just don't know. Form can be interpreted in many ways and has no absolute yardsticks. If you measure all the things with 'whether Contador drops all contenders or not' thingy, it is a delusion. So the 2011 Giro form doesn't guarantee him a victory, because Froome is able to push even bigger watts. But if Froome wins the Tour and you say 'Contador was off-form obviously', it will look absurd, because the guy have all posibilies to prepare and model his form for July the way he needs.
My point is Froome is able to win the Tour quite confidently, though in this case you will regard this situation differently, like 'off top form Contador', 'Contador allowed someone to win', 'Froome got lucky', etc etc etc.
Look at Andy. Don't you think that the lack of mental strength is a big reason why all this is happening?
Andy has lack of usual professionalism and he has cooled down to cycling in a way maybe. It is a bit different.
As you know I value Contador very high, thus saying Froome is the only threat for him is a pretty big compliment, isn't it?
Not, to me that is just disrespect to other contenders.
A lot of people who were in the same position as Contador was in tour '09 would do it differently for sure. And that is something you can't blame on the clini
Disagree. Contador wasn't alone. Sponsors and Kazakhstan supported him a lot. Yes, he felt a certain discomfort because teammates supported Lance. But it was in the nature of an inside-of-the-team atmosphere. On the road guys helped him and Lance equally. So that's not a reason that could restrain the rider who was so much stronger physically.
But I don't think Contador needs it though. I think he can be back at Giro '11 form.
It is impossible in the Tour. In 4 Tours Contador gained '20 at Arcalis and '45 at Verbier, going solo. Teams are very strong and no one can gain a lot on the climbs. Even Armstrong could not do it, without considering the 2002 Tour.