- Jul 29, 2012
- 11,703
- 4
- 0
Gregory said:I find it hard to make such absolute statements, not taking into account a particular year, race or even stage.
2009 Verbier Contador was surely better then 2009 Verbier Schleck. But in 2010 they were already matching each other. I don't want to use 2011 Tour as an example of Schleck's superiority because Contador was doing a second GT, and battling injuries. But now it is Schleck that is troubled by them. Contador seems to have reached his peak in 2009. From his return until now he apparently coudn't get into that zone, and I don't want to speculate on the reasons for it.
Can we really honestly say that we have seen the peak form of Schleck? It might have come last year if it wasn't for injuries, but now we simply have no ways of knowing it. I would be very careful however to judge a guy who already in 2007 showed his potential at such young age climbing Zoncolan with such ability, as an inferior climber to anyone.
You say Contador was at his peak in 2009. Schleck was only a few months younger than that Alberto in 2011 and he barely could ride away from him after that giro. Contador in giro 2011 was close if not even to tour 2009 Contador.
Besides since when do you get the title best climber based on solely the tour? In the previous years Contador proved he was anywhere the best while Schleck couldn't even get close to top 10 in many races.
