- Mar 13, 2009
- 5,245
- 2
- 0
Samson777 said:Why do you assume that![]()
What I mean by that is that Tinkov probably doesn't pay him such a huge amount of money that makes it worth sticking with him, instead of going to another team where he might earn less but has less of a hassle
Vino attacks everyone said:07 - He was on a really strong team. It was just that he and Rasmussen was minutes better than anybody else. So they were alone most of the climbs (Leipheimer and Popo was doing very well that year)
08- had a very strong team, especially in the Vuelta (giro team was not in top shape, for well known reasons)
09 - Lance fight, so yea
10 - strong team in the mountains, Vino, Tira and a Navarro that was arguebly the strongest super domestique in the field that year (Col du Madeleine was very impressive)
11 - yea, not much help there
12 - strong enough team, but aslo here the big 3 (or 4 if we count Quintana) were miles infornt of the rest when Froomey went out of gas
13 - strong team again.
Really only in 11 his team has been really weak.
You make some good points, and I agree that his teams were rarely weak, but for some reason I often felt like he didn't have as strong a team as he would have deserved. That's not to say that his teams weren't strong, it's just that I felt that by his status he would have deserved an even stronger one... but maybe I am still influenced by Armstrong's super teams, and that is not something that exists so much today anymore, even Sky was weak this year for Froome