(Apologies for discussing doping issues in this forum. I won't respond to this again).
ray j willings said:
Its about time the UCI gave everyone back their wins. Its a shambles of a farce of a pile of wasted Haribo's
We know who won. To try and deny Bertie or Armstrong is just F%%%ing stupid given what we know.
LaFlorecita said:
Eh, he won the 2011 Giro (note the past tense), he's just no longer listed as the official winner.
Jspear said:
"Official" bodies might be able to rewrite official records but they can't change real history...what actually happened. People who recognize all AC's wins know it's not official. They just understand what actually happened.
If Rasmussen had finished, of course he would have been the winner regardless of what officials found out later.
Red Rick said:
Alright people, we don't count paper victories
We count the real ones
9
I wonder if you posters would maintain the same line if after finishing first in a GT, a rider was found to have a motor in his bike. Still the real winner?
staubsauger said:
Anyway, backdated bans are big dull ***. Contador was allowed to race and he won. So he's the winner. Any statistic which says different is a stupid joke.
Do you think Contador would have preferred to have been banned two years prospectively? He got to serve his suspension with no time off except for a few months in 2012,so he didn't lose any further time getting back into shape. He entered the Giro fully aware that if he lost his case his results would be void. When you've tested positive, you're lucky to be racing at all. Racing knowing that if you really did dope and it's ruled that way you'll lose those results is still a better deal than not being able to race at all.
Ask all the riders who testified against LA for USADA if they would have preferred to trade their 6 month suspensions and backdated BS bans for several years of prospective suspensions. I've heard an awful lot of people say they got off light.
ggusta said:
Slams head against desk. idk, perhaps because the itt and the contenders pre-conceived abilities before and the results after shaped the strategy and the dynamics of the entire effin race???
So you’re saying that the non-TT portion of the race, taken alone, is completely meaningless? That it provides zero insight into the climbing results of the riders? That if there had been no ITT, Contador still would have won by two minutes? That he would have climbed a lot better if he hadn’t had that cushion?
I regard that as a hypothesis, certainly worthy of discussion, but not as a slam-head-against-desk obvious conclusion.
Jspear said:
I love the modern world of HD TV! You don't have to take some journalist word for it. You can find the truth all on your own!
I love the modern world of science! We don’t have to take the word of some journalist thousands of years ago. We can find the truth all on our own.