pmcg76 said:
Sums it up for me.
If Contador had gone around bullying other riders who talked about doping, claimed conspiracy theoris and witchunts along with nationalistic jingoism, used social media to mock other people, made payments to the governing body, and most importantly used his health problems as his shield for doping. I would have as little respect for Contador as I have for Armstrong and that goes for all athletes.
Yep the base hypocrisy of the two cases, when face to face and, sinisterly, at the
same moment, as well for all the reasons you have succinctly listed, particularly the highlighted (though I would add the entire cancer community, which is especially disgusting) bit, makes Alberto's sanction a rather cruel application of justice by a system that has different ways of weighing the same crime.
And when you consider the appalling merchandizing of the entire judicial process we have witnessed at the other Atlantic shore, which has also been a much debated topic in the Armstrong thread, the fact that Contador was unable to avail himself with the same armor, means that he has been made the sacrifice offered to the deities before the temple of Pro Cycling (among which may well sit a certain LA in the sanctuary, a kind of
sancta sanctorum of the two-wheeled sport) in place of the untouchable one.
In the end the sordid affair can only further damage a sport that has already been run through the mill, which means in this sense, once again Europe shoots itself in the foot.
I'm of the opinion that all the market determinants are what these cases really boil down and thus who is punishable and who is above being punished. Much has been discussed about the great difficulty in America of bringing down one of its heroes, though not what seems to be the fact that European Pro cycling has found that it can afford to bring another one of its champions down, but that the colossus across the ocean is a spouse from which divorce is not permitted, or daren’t even contemplated.