Benotti69 said:He can hardly hold on to Pres of UCI now.
New rule change coming in 5, 4, 3 ....
Anyone else throwing their hat into the ring ?
Benotti69 said:He can hardly hold on to Pres of UCI now.
Eyeballs Out said:New rule change coming in 5, 4, 3 ....
Anyone else throwing their hat into the ring ?
Race Radio said:If you were wondering why the Swiss Fed would embarrass themselves to defend Pat I suggest reading Gerard's blog
http://gerard.cc/2013/08/21/race-to-the-bottom/
Well, we don’t know. We know very little of Cookson’s plans, since his manifesto lacked in specifics. On top of that, he seems to have changed position on several important topics in recent months. On truth and reconciliation and women’s racing for example. This is OK, changing your mind is a subtle way of showing you’ve gotten smarter, but we must hope that a clear direction emerges. Otherwise, the changes smack of opportunism.
sniper said:what an excellent blog entry by Vroemen.
really strong.
it really is all politics, including the swiss withdrawel of pats nomination.
i also like what he says about cookson:
King Boonen said:Got to agree, excellent article. Very well thought out and raised a few things many probably hadn't realised, such as the reasons, other than financial pressure, for the removal of the Swiss nomination.
Paddy Power @paddypower
We've suspended betting on the next UCI President after some decent bets on Brian Cookson. Looks like Pat McQuaid's goose is cooked!
Alpechraxler said:Can we blame Chassot for trying to save Romandie in the globalized cycling calender ?
“We’re talking about a Russian here, don’t quote me on that.”
sniper said:funny. just done reading vroemen's blog, and chassot's resignation hits the CN front page:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/swiss-cycling-president-resigns-over-mcquaid-affair
Race Radio said:The UCI executive board voted to not take the McQuiad Nomination case to CAS
This is good, now Cookson has a list of people to fire when he gets in charge
http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/1...r-McQuaids-interpretation-of-Article-511.aspx
sniper said:tanx RR.
but it's bad news though if mcquaid manages to send out enough brown envelopes before the election and actually get re-elected.
any rumors on what his chances are?
talking about brown envelopes, me thinks (but correct me if I'm wrong) mcquaid has rather firm IOC backing (or at least firmer than cookson), by means of the verbruggen-rogge link.
fmk_RoI said:A Q for French or American cycling historians, which is relevant to the interpretation of Art 51: The journalist and race promoter Victor Breyer was the first secretary of the original UCI (the one the UK were excluded from). Though a French native and resident in France he represented the interests of the US fed at the UCI. Was his membership of the US fed honourary or does anyone have a copy of his membership card?
fmk_RoI said:A Q for French or American cycling historians, which is relevant to the interpretation of Art 51: The journalist and race promoter Victor Breyer was the first secretary of the original UCI (the one the UK were excluded from). Though a French native and resident in France he represented the interests of the US fed at the UCI. Was his membership of the US fed honourary or does anyone have a copy of his membership card?