Thoughtforfood said:I am not sure why I differ in my view. I guess it is hypocrisy, and I am ok with that. I think the difference may be that I believe the drugs make NFL competition better where as in cycling I think it makes the racing less interesting.
Let me ask you this. Let's just say that eliminating race radio makes the sport of cycling much more exciting. We see more wild time shifts, amazing breakaways, etc.
Would you then be more likely to ignore the doping issue in cycling, the way you do in the NFL?