Armstrong and Landis and Doping, Oh My!

[scribe]

Do you have an example or are you embellishing?

Too funny! I DID say satirical. You should take that as complementary.

 

[miloman]

So, I surmise from this that what RR posted was a total fabrication. Where are the same bully tactics you threatend me with? Didn't he cross some line? I guess I get it now. It is a mob rule mentality, not a free exchange of supportable ideas. That's too bad, I expected more. Especailly from Senior Members and such.

 

[JRTinMA]

So, I surmise from this that what RR posted was a total fabrication. Where are the same bully tactics you threatend me with? Didn't he cross some line? I guess I get it now. It is a mob rule mentality, not a free exchange of supportable ideas. That's too bad, I expected more. Especailly from Senior Members and such.

Keep in mind it's a forum, your expectations should be pretty low but have some fun and occasionally you will be surprised. Its sort of open season especially where that LA is involved, i see a doper and others see the most horrible existance one could ever create.

 

[Hugh Januss]

So, I surmise from this that what RR posted was a total fabrication. Where are the same bully tactics you threatend me with? Didn't he cross some line? I guess I get it now. It is a mob rule mentality, not a free exchange of supportable ideas. That's too bad, I expected more. Especailly from Senior Members and such.

I guess you can call it mob rule if that makes you feel better. I am just saying for me personally I have found RR's "insider info" to be right well more often than not, whereas I have rarely agreed with one of your crack-brained postings.That's all.

 

[miloman]

I guess you can call it mob rule if that makes you feel better. I am just saying for me personally I have found RR's "insider info" to be right well more often than not, whereas I have rarely agreed with one of your crack-brained postings.That's all.

I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contray opinon. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.

 

[Hugh Januss]

I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contray opinon. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.

The moderators here were, and still are posters first, who have been duped into volunteering for an unpaid and largely unrewarding chore, one can hardly expect them to call someone a liar and tell them to shut up when they hold most of the same opinions themselves. Only you know what your real motivation is in coming here, but if you come in with opinions that the majority here does not agree with you shouldn't get your panties in a wad when they disagree.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contra opinion. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.

On this thread you have provided articles that are often days old which have already been discussed and then embellish what they say - which is lying.

So, do you know if RR is lying?
You can choose to believe what he says or not.

BTW - as much as you say you want 'justice' your position appears 'contrary' - you are entitled to it, but when you try and boost your position by exaggerating points don't expect it to go unchallenged.

 

[miloman]

On this thread you have provided articles that are often days old which have already been discussed and then embellish what they say - which is lying.

So, do you know if RR is lying?
You can choose to believe what he says or not.

BTW - as much as you say you want 'justice' your position appears 'contrary' - you are entitled to it, but when you try and boost your position by exaggerating points don't expect it to go unchallenged.

Ok, so next time I won't post anything corroborating my information because it is more than 24 hours old. And when my facts are challenged, I'll simply say I have inside information from a guy I served coffee and doughnuts to.

If that seem to work for you, albeit, that's what I'll do. It's the coffee and doughnut defense, why hasn't Lance thought of that one? From here on, when challenged for facts all we will need to say is "coffee and doughtnuts," and nothing further needs to be said! I GET IT NOW! This will be easy.

 

[Race Radio]

I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contray opinon. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.

If I am lying or not will be clear in the next few months, then you can apologize for your rudeness.

I have over 3,500 posts here. Most are just random babble and fart jokes, but many have info that you will only hear a few weeks, or months, later in the newspaper. Please find one where I am wrong......you won't. Now compare that to your poor track record.

Save the persecution complex.

 

[Dr. Maserati]

Ok, so next time I won't post anything corroborating my information because it is more than 24 hours old. And when my facts are challenged, I'll simply say I have inside information from a guy I served coffee and doughnuts to.

If that seem to work for you, albeit, that's what I'll do. It's the coffee and doughnut defense, why hasn't Lance thought of that one? From here on, when challenged for facts all we will need to say is "coffee and doughtnuts," and nothing further needs to be said! I GET IT NOW! This will be easy.

Your difficulty is you haven't posted any facts - just your opinions.

Sure, you can post stuff that you 'heard'- and posters will ask for corroboration. Then its up to the individual members to decide - as you have with RR's information - to either accept it or reject it.

 

[Oldman]

If I am lying or not will be clear in the next few months, then you can apologize for your rudeness.

I have over 3,500 posts here. Most are just random babble and fart jokes, but many have info that you will only hear a few weeks, or months, later in the newspaper. Please find one where I am wrong......you won't. Now compare that to your poor track record.

Save the persecution complex.

by the way...did you see how O'bee got caught? Buying EPO from Mexico City...jeez these guys are stupid.

 

[Hugh Januss]

If I am lying or not will be clear in the next few months, then you can apologize for your rudeness.

I have over 3,500 posts here. Most are just random babble and fart jokes, but many have info that you will only hear a few weeks, or months, later in the newspaper. Please find one where I am wrong......you won't. Now compare that to your poor track record.

Save the persecution complex.

A lot more if you include all the Eva Maria ones, jeez don't you ever work?

 

[Race Radio]

by the way...did you see how O'bee got caught? Buying EPO from Mexico City...jeez these guys are stupid.

Stupid is right.....Mexico is dangerous these days.

 

[miloman]

Your difficulty is you haven't posted any facts - just your opinions.

Sure, you can post stuff that you 'heard'- and posters will ask for corroboration. Then its up to the individual members to decide - as you have with RR's information - to either accept it or reject it.

Everyting I posted has had a link or a quote cited to back it up. If I have offered an opinion, I have clearly indicated that it was conjecture. Again, just because you say differently, doesn't mean it's true. You must believe the old adage that a lie in print over time will become the truth, I don't. I urge other posters to read the thread and judge for themselves. When challenged, I have always produced the documentation. I don't know how this is going to turn out, but I bet, just bet, that even you won't be completely satisfied!

By the way, I heard that Lance was going to be the next contestant on "Dancing with the Stars." COFFEE AND DOUGHNUTS!

 

[Dr. Maserati]

Everyting I posted has had a link or a quote cited to back it up. If I have offered an opinion, I have clearly indicated that it was conjecture. Again, just because you say differently, doesn't mean it's true. You must believe the old adage that a lie in print over time will become the truth, I don't. I urge other posters to read the thread and judge for themselves. When challenged, I have always produced the documentation. I don't know how this is going to turn out, but I bet, just bet, that even you won't be completely satisfied!

By the way, I heard that Lance was going to be the next contestant on "Dancing with the Stars." COFFEE AND DOUGHNUTS!

Cool - any idea who the 'star' is that he will be dancing with?

 

[Protein]

RR has a long history of providing accurate inside information AND lending complete embellishments of mistruth designed to get a reaction as if armstrong's handlers are actually looking in at the forum.

It's best to read his work as satirical fiction until proven otherwise. I wouldnt wait for mod assistence with that, as he totally gets a free pass from the administrators of the forum.

But if people regularly assert things that MIGHT happen to be facts, just to bait people, that's trolling. It causes unnecessary friction and makes forums unreliable. The first duty of mods is to crack down on such behavior, not play favorites.

 

[scribe]

But if people regularly assert things that MIGHT happen to be facts, just to bait people, that's trolling. It causes unnecessary friction and makes forums unreliable. The first duty of mods is to crack down on such behavior, not play favorites.

Honestly, I don't really care what the mods do......as what they are actually crafting here is quite obvious to anyone who hangs out for a while.

But occasionally it needs to be pointed out, that some of what RR posts is fantastical, without regard for additional proof or retraction at a later date when the information doesn't pan out.

 

[The Bald Eagle]

The sick Psycho Lee Harvey Oswald SHOT JFK. Full stop. Lance Armstrong is a doper full stop. Flloyd Landis is a doper full stop. There is no such thing as God. Full stop. Those are the fact's. That is all any one need's to Know. End of story. Susan Westemeyer. Put a lock on this Thread. Please.

 

[krebs303]

Stupid is right.....Mexico is dangerous these days.

It's really quite lovely. honest

 

[Maxiton]

Cool - any idea who the 'star' is that he will be dancing with?

Jeff Novitsky, of course.

The sick Psycho Lee Harvey Oswald SHOT JFK. Full stop. Lance Armstrong is a doper full stop. Flloyd Landis is a doper full stop. There is no such thing as God. Full stop. Those are the fact's. That is all any one need's to Know. End of story. Susan Westemeyer. Put a lock on this Thread. Please.

Your knowledge of history appears to be as weak as your spelling. How do you spell Lee Harvey Oswald? P-A-T-S-Y. The rest of your post is probably right - except for needs and facts.

 

[The Bald Eagle]

Jeff Novitsky, of course.



Your knowledge of history appears to be as weak as your spelling. How do you spell Lee Harvey Oswald? P-A-T-S-Y. The rest of your post is probably right - except for needs and facts.

Yes perhaps The Jfk Assassination belong's on another thread. But I read all the evidence on the Case. Yep I was a conspiracy buff for a while. But I am a convert To the single Gunman Theory. I read the warren commission's report. From back to front. Yes that now infamous quote. "They have taken me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet Union. IM JUST A PATSY." I READ ABOUT THE case till I was blue in the face. Both arguments for conspiracy and against. Well he was not a "Patsy". Just a murderer. Perhaps Lance Armstrong could claim that he was a patsy also. Lance " I emphatically deny these Charges ". " I demand My hygienic Rights" !!. Reporter "Did You take EPO " Lance " No in fact I have not been charged
with that. ( him being supercharged ON EPO ) the first time I heard of that was when David Walsh asked me that question.!!

 

[Barrus]

I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contray opinon. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.

There is a huge difference between you and RR. Your posts are almost completely contained to this thread. You have at least twice now resurrected this thread with old news that has been discussed before in other threads, which are easy to find. And to top it all of, each time you started again in this thread you started with a lie, an excaggeration, or something else you fabricated to get discussion.
I do not care about someones opinion, I have no problem with people such as JRTinMA, or flicker for example, as long as they follow regular forum etiquette, and you sir, do not

 

[SpartacusRox]

Putting Lance and Johan in prison is the only effective anti-doping method I can think of.

Not a great lateral thinker then are you?

 

[Rupert]

Random babble

...Most are just random babble and fart jokes, but many have info that you will only hear a few weeks, or months, later in the newspaper.

My problem is figuring out which a particular post is... So is the "George sang..." comment Random Babble or "info...?"

 

[dbrower]

My problem is figuring out which a particular post is... So is the "George sang..." comment Random Babble or "info...?"

It sounds like random, possibly wishful thinking to me. True or false, it wasn't an old story reposted.

-dB