- Jul 22, 2009
- 3,355
- 5
- 0
Too funny! I DID say satirical. You should take that as complementary.Race Radio said:Do you have an example or are you embellishing?
Too funny! I DID say satirical. You should take that as complementary.Race Radio said:Do you have an example or are you embellishing?
miloman said:So, I surmise from this that what RR posted was a total fabrication. Where are the same bully tactics you threatend me with? Didn't he cross some line? I guess I get it now. It is a mob rule mentality, not a free exchange of supportable ideas. That's too bad, I expected more. Especailly from Senior Members and such.
miloman said:So, I surmise from this that what RR posted was a total fabrication. Where are the same bully tactics you threatend me with? Didn't he cross some line? I guess I get it now. It is a mob rule mentality, not a free exchange of supportable ideas. That's too bad, I expected more. Especailly from Senior Members and such.
Hugh Januss said:I guess you can call it mob rule if that makes you feel better. I am just saying for me personally I have found RR's "insider info" to be right well more often than not, whereas I have rarely agreed with one of your crack-brained postings.That's all.
miloman said:I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contray opinon. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.
On this thread you have provided articles that are often days old which have already been discussed and then embellish what they say - which is lying.miloman said:I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contra opinion. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.
Dr. Maserati said:On this thread you have provided articles that are often days old which have already been discussed and then embellish what they say - which is lying.
So, do you know if RR is lying?
You can choose to believe what he says or not.
BTW - as much as you say you want 'justice' your position appears 'contrary' - you are entitled to it, but when you try and boost your position by exaggerating points don't expect it to go unchallenged.
miloman said:I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contray opinon. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.
miloman said:Ok, so next time I won't post anything corroborating my information because it is more than 24 hours old. And when my facts are challenged, I'll simply say I have inside information from a guy I served coffee and doughnuts to.
If that seem to work for you, albeit, that's what I'll do. It's the coffee and doughnut defense, why hasn't Lance thought of that one? From here on, when challenged for facts all we will need to say is "coffee and doughtnuts," and nothing further needs to be said! I GET IT NOW! This will be easy.
Race Radio said:If I am lying or not will be clear in the next few months, then you can apologize for your rudeness.
I have over 3,500 posts here. Most are just random babble and fart jokes, but many have info that you will only hear a few weeks, or months, later in the newspaper. Please find one where I am wrong......you won't. Now compare that to your poor track record.
Save the persecution complex.
Race Radio said:If I am lying or not will be clear in the next few months, then you can apologize for your rudeness.
I have over 3,500 posts here. Most are just random babble and fart jokes, but many have info that you will only hear a few weeks, or months, later in the newspaper. Please find one where I am wrong......you won't. Now compare that to your poor track record.
Save the persecution complex.
Oldman said:by the way...did you see how O'bee got caught? Buying EPO from Mexico City...jeez these guys are stupid.
Dr. Maserati said:Your difficulty is you haven't posted any facts - just your opinions.
Sure, you can post stuff that you 'heard'- and posters will ask for corroboration. Then its up to the individual members to decide - as you have with RR's information - to either accept it or reject it.
miloman said:Everyting I posted has had a link or a quote cited to back it up. If I have offered an opinion, I have clearly indicated that it was conjecture. Again, just because you say differently, doesn't mean it's true. You must believe the old adage that a lie in print over time will become the truth, I don't. I urge other posters to read the thread and judge for themselves. When challenged, I have always produced the documentation. I don't know how this is going to turn out, but I bet, just bet, that even you won't be completely satisfied!
By the way, I heard that Lance was going to be the next contestant on "Dancing with the Stars." COFFEE AND DOUGHNUTS!
scribe said:RR has a long history of providing accurate inside information AND lending complete embellishments of mistruth designed to get a reaction as if armstrong's handlers are actually looking in at the forum.
It's best to read his work as satirical fiction until proven otherwise. I wouldnt wait for mod assistence with that, as he totally gets a free pass from the administrators of the forum.
Honestly, I don't really care what the mods do......as what they are actually crafting here is quite obvious to anyone who hangs out for a while.Protein said:But if people regularly assert things that MIGHT happen to be facts, just to bait people, that's trolling. It causes unnecessary friction and makes forums unreliable. The first duty of mods is to crack down on such behavior, not play favorites.
It's really quite lovely. honestRace Radio said:Stupid is right.....Mexico is dangerous these days.![]()
Dr. Maserati said:Cool - any idea who the 'star' is that he will be dancing with?
The Bald Eagle said:The sick Psycho Lee Harvey Oswald SHOT JFK. Full stop. Lance Armstrong is a doper full stop. Flloyd Landis is a doper full stop. There is no such thing as God. Full stop. Those are the fact's. That is all any one need's to Know. End of story. Susan Westemeyer. Put a lock on this Thread. Please.
Maxiton said:Jeff Novitsky, of course.
Your knowledge of history appears to be as weak as your spelling. How do you spell Lee Harvey Oswald? P-A-T-S-Y. The rest of your post is probably right - except for needs and facts.
miloman said:I have no problem with what you said. You have the right to your opinion. My issue is with the Moderator and other Senior member's heavy-handed approach to me and my posts and then letting RR get off without even a warning. Why not call him a liar or tell him to shut up or threaten his postings? It's clear that there are members who only want to have things floating out there that they agree with. Can't have a contray opinon. They seem to go to great lengths to muddle it up with nonsense.
online-rider said:Putting Lance and Johan in prison is the only effective anti-doping method I can think of.
Race Radio said:...Most are just random babble and fart jokes, but many have info that you will only hear a few weeks, or months, later in the newspaper.
Rupert said:My problem is figuring out which a particular post is... So is the "George sang..." comment Random Babble or "info...?"