thehog said:So making a comeback and continuing to dope and being paid large appearances fees under the guise of “cancer awareness” is acceptable? Because one generates 1 million dollars per race appearance the other has to race in a t-shirt at a local crit it makes the million dollar man better? So based on that theory if Landis is telling the truth and sues Armstrong and makes a million he’s now better? And the end of the day the kings and queens and pawns all end up in the same box. I bet I know who will feel better about them selves when that times comes. Your logic is flawed. You're placing value on the person by the money they have not by the truth they’re telling. Think about it.
If anything that you wrote is true then for sure I wouldn't think it's right. Has Lance been tested by loads of cycling feds and the UCI?(500x) Yes. Did he come up positive..yes and he had a Dr's note in 99. Landis had a compelling back story with the Mennonite and replaced hip thing going for him..oh what a difference a note makes. I could care less if Lance has any money..he is not giving me any..The point is Landis would not have said squat if Lance didn't have any cash. That is the flawed logic. If Landis says anything he gets will be donated to charity ( cancer would be the most ironic) I will give him a free pass on his intentions like you have.