- Jan 5, 2010
- 295
- 0
- 0
This investigation is about quite a bit more than JUST DOPING. Pay attention, elsewise you come across as very ill informed. Evidence point to the conclusion that Armstrong wasn’t just an ordinary cheat, but a bully, liar, fraud, and {fill in the blank} ontop of it.
Okay, call me ill-informed, but you presuppose that either one of us was cheated. I wasn’t competing and I doubt you were either. I’m not a fan of Lance Armstrong. I agree he seems like an egocentric jerk, but he didn’t beat me; so let someone whom he cheated take up the fight! In a court of law, I can’t file a lawsuit unless I can prove damages. It’s considered frivolous. I, like millions of others, simply watched and enjoyed the action vicariously. It’s unfortunate that whatever he did during those years, he probably did juiced to the gills. Perhaps someone who lost to Armstrong could investigate the possibility of filing a civil lawsuit. I’d rather see them get millions than the federal government waste tax-payer’s money on an investigation that has all the earmarks of a loser.
Okay, call me ill-informed, but you presuppose that either one of us was cheated. I wasn’t competing and I doubt you were either. I’m not a fan of Lance Armstrong. I agree he seems like an egocentric jerk, but he didn’t beat me; so let someone whom he cheated take up the fight! In a court of law, I can’t file a lawsuit unless I can prove damages. It’s considered frivolous. I, like millions of others, simply watched and enjoyed the action vicariously. It’s unfortunate that whatever he did during those years, he probably did juiced to the gills. Perhaps someone who lost to Armstrong could investigate the possibility of filing a civil lawsuit. I’d rather see them get millions than the federal government waste tax-payer’s money on an investigation that has all the earmarks of a loser.