TShame said:
Actually, the early races don't matter. Lance uses these challenges to get his competition mad and competing too early. He did this years ago to Mayo, who more than willingly took the bait and beat Armstrong handily on the slopes of Mount Ventoux before the Tour. While he was still reveling in his glory, Lance quickly whipped out a statement like," Being faster today won't help you win a month from now in the Tour."
As the Tour had several days in the flat, Lance and his team attacked long before the mountains and left Mayo and Heras dazed and confused, wondering how the race was over before it started for them. Lance proved to be virtually untouchable in the mountains and never shed a tear over his 'loss' earlier in the season. That's how you use an early race to your own advantage.
True, Lance is older and can not dominate in the mountains, but the Tour isn't won by legs alone.
It's not all about the Tour for every rider. Mayo would likely have never won a Tour since his abilities versus the clock were far inferior to his rivals. Plus his team with its self inflicted limitations could never field a support crew to rival what Postal, T-Mobile and Once could roll out. If there was a TTT his and certain other contenders chances were nonexistent at the time of the Tour route announcement.
Mayo and others have had to take their victories where they could get them. To minimize a Dauphine win as unimportant is typical Armstrong bs.
I'll bet it was and is important to Mayo and a team like Euskatel-Euskadi.
It's only important to Armstrong if he's the one on the top step. If a rival beats him then his excuse was "this is only preparation for the Tour". It's importance is relative. You really give him way too much credit for being this tactical and strategic genius. He was as fallible as the average rider, sometimes allowing emotion to get the best of him to his own detriment. A perfect example is 2003 Dauphine where he battled Mayo for the win with such intensity that it had a detrimental effect on his Tour performance. Did Mayo bait him into this battle and thus did Armstrong learn from Mayo?

The folowing year Mayo won the Dauphine which of course was followed by the Armstrong quote that you posted.
Armstrong seemed to have a dislike for any rider that was strong in the mountains and unpredictable with their attacks. Mayo/Pantani are prime examples. Not necessarily threats if they toed the line of the Armstrong/Bruyneel style of racing, but considered bothersome when they would launch their multiple attacks causing Postal to have to improvise on their preset stategy. Thus the Armstrong quote of Pantani being a "little sh!t starter". Contador falls in that same category except Armstrong has no answers for Contador's superiority other than his pathetic twittering and anemic attempts at manipulation.