Thoughtforfood said:
Like I said, when its your hero, you whine like a baby that had his lollipop taken away. Suck it up cowgirl, he cheated and got busted.
I have remained consistent. I give no quarter to any doper, and Contador is Mr. Dope at this point. I also realize they all do it. That means Alberto McClenplasticizer doesn't deserve sanction?
As for me being American. Xenophobia is one of the most pathetically moronic clubs to join, I am guessing you have earned all of the merit badges douchewhistle.
Oh, and I am not sure where you see that I have walked away from Mr. Armstrong's fraudulent Tour wins, but then again, none of your posts have much of a point, so I suffer no surprise that you added another inane comment.
But thanks for attributing the downfall of the Clinic to me. I always wanted to win something...
I like how you think that a plasticizer test should be applied to one rider. You've never been against doping because you hate cheats. Your a vindictive punce standing in the corner poking the next guy who gets caught. Standards and equality mean nothing to your primitive mind. Why isn't the test applied to everyone champ? Why shouldn't it be? Don't answer, you'll simpy show your bias. Do I think someone should be sanctioned for Clenbuterol. No, not 5 picograms that is ****ing pathetic. If I were to be tested right now, I'd be banned for two yeard for taking an allergy tablet. You and your ilk make no distinction to the variables. You apply nearly zero credible application to what is found in tests? If you're against doping...you test all of them for the damn plasticizers. Oh, I forgot...you'd have no sport left to watch and nobody left to pick on when they fall by the wayside. If you are against doping dip****, you test everyone and bust all people. You don't find some brand new, unspecified test and go...hhmmm, due process, **** that, blanket across the board testing, **** that as well. Selective targeting in a yet to be approved testing method, not by the UCI by more importantly WADA is not right (the rider is irrelevant) and does not stop a doping practice being abused. It merely makes a headline and a scapegoat for a time period. Everyone here with brain knows that if you run this supposed plasticizer test, you'd catch lots of people. So why not do it? You're anti-doping and claiming to be consistent. So why not man up and prove it? Why hide behind your pathetic..."they haven't tested positive" denial, so we don't test them. Everyone here knows the top 10 are doping. Catch them all or don't bother. Busting a lot in one go would do wonders for anti-doping...but that isn't what you're about is it. Proof in itself you're a fraud and coward. You masquerade as an anti-doping crusader, but when the crunch comes you're only in it to slag people off.
People like you are parasites and cowards. The funny thing is a guy like Armstrong would wipe the floor of you if you met him in real life. All your loathsome dopers would. Why? Because you're a pussy. Me xenophobic?...no just fed up with American losers littering the globe with their BS. If nobody stand up to the tools America infects the world with, more will follow. Wait, the Aussie dollar will soon pass yours, I might pay a visit and show you and your ilk what real people are like. Void that idea, I might catch something. Europe is far better. Heck, Nth Korea would be more inviting. How do they treat people in your country these days? Still abandoning citizens when their city floods? Enjoy being a born loser you 42 year old yankee chump. America home of the cowardly and mentally challenged...should be a catchy slogan don't you think. TFF style!
To those people here who disagree. I ask you this. How many of you had the gall to come on here in July and sink the boot into Armstrong? I don't particularly like the man but I couldn't sink to that level of behaviour. The guy was down and out, pathetic really and what did some here do? They bagged him and raved on and on. Nothing honourable or dignified there, regardless of what the man had done. Those who did, you're not in the Clinic to campaign against anti-doping. You're here to get your jollies from sledging those in cycling who fall by the wayside. You don't really believe in clean cycling or legal equality. Because if you did you'd apply the same brush to all. People around here say Valverde was dirty...yeah, but according to the UCI he was clean every test. What does that say about the guys beating him and finishing near him? Oh, I forgot...they're clean as well according to the UCI. Circular twisted logic is not rational people. You cannot legally allow those under your influence to race and then turn around and go...hhmmm, one doping incident, everything should be erased from your records despite our protocols saying you were clean. I forgot, being a doper means we can throw the book at you to some people.
Do I think Contador is clean?...hahaha! I think Andy Schleck is a raving doper (amazing rider) and Contador has beaten him every time they've raced. I believe in something you clowns never will. Fairness. As I said, you're like TFF, cowards and hypocrits. You derive pleasure from picking on a select few whose name is in the headlines. Your not here to crusade for equality, for clean cycling, for those doing the right thing to be given a level playing field. You're here to derive your own warped pleasure from others faults.
So TFF, enjoy getting your jollies from this incident. Till the next guy gets caught and thrown to the wolves, enjoy AC guys. At least he is a millionaire. At least he beat other dopers. He'll be back if he's punished. Oh, and whilst I'm at it, he and all the other dopers in all sports will always be better than you, clean or unclean. To everyone here who thinks I'm sticking up for Contador...no, there is far more to the issue than that. Go back and find my first post on the CN sight. You'll find I am very anti-doping. But the doping system right now is wrong. My cold and flu tablet I take for allergies is illegal under WADA code. I'd be banned for two years sitting here typing under WADA code. Pseudoephedrine. There are holes littering the doping process and testing parameters are out of whack. WADA is not all smiles and cookies. When someone explains to me rationally how 5 picograms wins you the TdF, I'll agree. Better yet I'll aks you to explain to someone who has studied measurement systems in detail, what it is you are defining. No diversions to plasticizers and people who may or may not have seen AC dope. Real evidence on the one thing that is concrete. The Clenbuterol. One person who can stand up and say that a pro athlete needs to use an asthma medication to lose weight!
If I took you to my local gym, you'd be in for the shock of your life. At pro-cyclist weight levels, I can tell if I've put on or lost a pound easily. If you're exerting yourself hard every day, you'll lose weight. Eat right, you lose more. A pound or two was mentioned in the articles quoted. You goofballs baying for blood didn't even mention the big weight loss wonder drug. The one Wigans was chomping down like M&Ms. AICAR. You really didn't think half of your ramblings through people. As I said, the Clinic has become a joke. Clenbuterol or AICAR? Hmmnnn. East choice. One wasn't banned till this month. One is super effective, the other at a few picograms is insignificant, especially in the month before a GT! It is laughable.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram