The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Bala Verde said:In other words, is 4% an accurate reflection of dopers, or is it a highly inaccurate (too low) number?
So, could the passport be called a success when out of the total pool of riders that are comitted to the passport (all current riders of the teams that contribute to the passport financially), 4-5% are detected?
pmcg76 said:I think the De Bonis case is the interesting one here adding to the overall confusion of modern doping and detection. De Bonis rode last season with Gerolsteiner, same team as Kohl, Schumacher & Rebellin but he was suspended by the team for a period because of suspicious internal blood values.
Two, maybe more possiblities here:
Gerolsteiner were able to recognise De Bonis unusual blood values and suspect doping but unable to identify the three guys caught which suggests even the blood testing route is not full proof as some on here suggest and backs up the theory that the top guys can buy better doping products and better cover-ups.
or
Gerolsteiner identied the blood values of Kohl, Schumacher or Rebellin as well but deliberately chose to ignore them to protect their big guns.
Either way, things are not looking good for solving the doping problem in cycling.
Another Saunier Duval alumni busted, Milram had suspended Astarloa and once again the rumours surrounding the alleged positve dope results after his World Championship victory in Hamilton 2004 may have been true. People often dismiss rumours and gossip but its hard to ignore when they always seem to be eventually proved true .Caucchioli rode for the allegedly clean Credit Agricole team as for Serrano, another spaniard.
Another sad day for cycling and I agree with many that these gys are just the scapegoats for bigger names.
Jamsque said:I thought I would never see this happening. I am so happy, I am going to buy myself a pie to celebrate
elapid said:Too low. And look at the five riders. One ex-world champion who has already been fired by his PT team for abnormal blood values, and the others have got in a few breaks here and there. If these middling professionals were doping and not getting results, then what are the top tier doing?
mikeNphilly said:This msg board is silly. I don't understand how you guys can watch cycling, since it seems you think everyone is cheeting, you may as well watch WWE(wrestling), at least there you know its fake. I thought when this msg. board was created it would get some good cycling racing disucssion, instead it's 85% drug talk.
I myself let the riders fail tests, if they fail they are doping, if they pass they are clean. It's very black and white, but you guys love to talk about the grey area so much, it become a grey area the size of the united states, with pass/fail areas the size of city block.
watch the races and enjoy them, quit focusing on who is cheating or not, it will get you no where. I'm off to ride, and hopefully 6 months from now when I come back here, the tone of the board will change, but I doubt it.
Peace.
Whenever I read a message like this I get a little suspicious of who the sender might be. (?)mikeNphilly said:This msg board is silly. I don't understand how you guys can watch cycling, since it seems you think everyone is cheeting, you may as well watch WWE(wrestling), at least there you know its fake. I thought when this msg. board was created it would get some good cycling racing disucssion, instead it's 85% drug talk.
I myself let the riders fail tests, if they fail they are doping, if they pass they are clean. It's very black and white, but you guys love to talk about the grey area so much, it become a grey area the size of the united states, with pass/fail areas the size of city block.
watch the races and enjoy them, quit focusing on who is cheating or not, it will get you no where. I'm off to ride, and hopefully 6 months from now when I come back here, the tone of the board will change, but I doubt it.
Peace.
Escarabajo said:Whenever I read a message like this I get a little suspicious of who the sender might be. (?)
mikeNphilly said:This msg board is silly. I don't understand how you guys can watch cycling, since it seems you think everyone is cheeting, you may as well watch WWE(wrestling), at least there you know its fake. I thought when this msg. board was created it would get some good cycling racing disucssion, instead it's 85% drug talk.
Alpe d'Huez said:You just know the killer is going to spring up and hack up the hapless teenagers, but not how, or when. So you sit back, guess, and watch for the gore. And you know in the back (front?) of your head that when the sheriff says that "the killer is dead", that it's not true, and he's is going to spring back to life at any moment and start his reign of terror all over!
Bala Verde said:Very apt in the Rasmussen case when Davide Cassani said 'I know what you did last summer'
BroDeal said:I heard Cassani saw him on Friday the 13th, a couple of weeks before Halloween, somewhere on Elm Street. Cassani screamed when he saw him. Rasmussen insisted his name was not Michael, it was Jason. His final destination was Cherry Falls, but this all may be an urban legend.
Kennf1 said:These riders are unlikely to dump a ton of money into a legal defense. Astarloa, as already pointed out, was already busted for this last year by his own team (Milram beat UCI to the punch).
mikeNphilly said:This msg board is silly. I don't understand how you guys can watch cycling, since it seems you think everyone is cheeting, you may as well watch WWE(wrestling), at least there you know its fake. I thought when this msg. board was created it would get some good cycling racing disucssion, instead it's 85% drug talk.
jackhammer111 said:yep.... sadly that's pretty much it.
a few new names come and go but most of the venom is the same handful of people.
jackhammer111 said:yep.... sadly that's pretty much it.
a few new names come and go but most of the venom is the same handful of people.
Bala Verde said:To illustrate, 2002 Giro results
1 Paolo Savoldelli Italy Index Alexia 89h 22' 42"
2 Tyler Hamilton United States Team CSC Tiscali 1' 41"
3 Pietro Caucchioli Italy Alessio 2' 12"
4 Juan Manuel Garate Spain Lampre-Daikin 3' 14"
5 Pavel Tonkov Russia Lampre-Daikin 5' 34"
6 Aitor González Spain Kelme-Costa Blanca 6' 54"
7 Georg Totschnig Austria Gerolsteiner 7' 02"
8 Fernando Escartín Spain Team Coast 7' 07"
9 Rik Verbrugghe Belgium Lotto-Adecco 9' 36"
10 Dario Frigo Italy Tacconi Sport-Emmegi 11' 50"
and the WC 2003
Men's Road Race
1 Igor Astarloa Spain 6h30'19"
2 Alejandro Valverde Spain 6h30'24"
3 Peter van Petegem Belgium s.t.
Men's Time Trial
1) David Millar United Kingdom 51'17"
2) Michael Rogers Australia + 25"
3) Uwe Peschel Germany s.t.
To respond to pmcg76, ot seems that riders, since they are on the same team, exchange information, tips, tricks, techniques and names of corrupted/corruptable medical doctors. Perhaps they even get a discount from their doctor if they bring in a 'referral'! It wouldn't surprise me if all of this flies under the radar of the best organised team with the best intentions. Perhaps they don't even detect anything using their internal controls. If 9 out of 10 times samples beat official tests, how can we expect teams to have developed even better tests?
On the other hand, it could also be that they choose to ignore certain small anomalies, while giving the boot to the ones that could cause a positive after a real race. It's a win-win situation. To the public it seems they have a great anti-doping program, while they continue to win races with 'undetectable' riders...