Australian Crime Commission investigation finds widespread doping

Page 8 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 14, 2010
727
0
0
Galic Ho said:
Oh and apparently the coaches are doping in their spare time.

....and they have an out if any receipts for PEDs are found in the club accounts..."that was just for the coaches"
 
Jul 8, 2009
501
0
0
Word on the street... one of the Essendon coaches on the WADA banned gear is James Hird.

Is there any way that the AFL can retroactively take that '93 flag of the cheats? :D
 
Jun 13, 2009
180
0
0
sugarman said:
He also never got the chance to test his skill against the mighty Bangladeshi's, or belt 380 against a 3rd string Zimbabwean side a la Matthew Hayden.

What?!?! You mean all those centuries Tendulkar smashed against the Bangladeshi's were cheap?? Sacrilege!!!:rolleyes:

Hirdy on the juice, now that IS interesting. I'm surprised that more AFL footballers haven't been caught up in this.
I can't look at Travis Cloke and not think the guy has been abusing HGH.

I also saw Aker on telly over the weekend and one of the things he said was that the good players didn't need PED's. Only the also rans used them to try and keep up. Now where have we heard that before? Maybe someone got in his ear, because he copped a heap in 07 when he suggested that there were PED's in AFL.

Go Pies!!! (Hopefully the blood bags made it back from Arizona):cool:
 
Apr 14, 2010
727
0
0
PACONi said:
I'm surprised that more AFL footballers haven't been caught up in this.
I can't look at Travis Cloke and not think the guy has been abusing HGH.

The reason so few have been implicated is likely that the investigation wasn't looking for footballers, it was looking at bikies/criminals, and they just happened to come across footballers as part of the investigation - then passed the info on to ASADA. If they actually targeted footballers the numbers would be huge
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Galic Ho said:
A prime example of the type of abnormal build in these football codes is one Sonny Bill Williams. He's been in the news lately. My God that boy grew when he went to France to play Union. He's a monster now. Looks lithe and athletic, but carries so much weight in terms of pure muscle. Just doesn't seem right.

Regarding the muscle movements. You meant a combo of eccentric and concentric movements. But I understood your point. These guys are getting specific isolated muscle groups beyond the size and scope one would expect if you were just hitting up the gym. One would expect an improvement via mandatory compound movements with normal resistance training. But these guys are getting the strength gains one gets from isolated exercises for specific muscle groups WITHOUT the massive bulking that traditionally occurs, ie; as you'd see in a body builder. Note body builders athletic ability is practically mute. They cannot run to save themselves. But these guys have the upper body physique and strength that says they shouldn't be able to run...but they do. Plus with the mass they now possess they hit like a truck on impact.

As for the trapezius, it along with the latissimus dorsi are hard to accentuate. They require specific gym work. Getting that classical V shape in guys, especially one that stands out takes a lot of work. It's what the Mr Olympia events of the 80s focused on. The era after Arnold. Still prominent today, but the legs and abs get a lot of focus too. Those guys are absurd in their proportions and total weight. You have to really bulk up...footie players are missing that component. They've got the strength without excess muscle mass, thus allowing them to still run. Basically they are running tanks on a football field.
you obviously got my point. thanks, cos the reply was to you. p'raps better suited to the pm tho.

when I said eccentric, or concentric, I was using the wrong terminology. I was thinking flexion/extension.

and the hip flexion, the "driver" muscles (hip flexor) and the abductor.

meant the outer "sweep" when 15 years back, rugby players would only get thighs this big from quats/deadlifts/legpresses, and they would work unilaterally against gravity pushing legs away (ex deadlift)

but now they have larger quads, and lithe shape, they look leaner, but skinner, but they are actually carrying more muscle on that leg.

james o'connor and chis yarran hav extraordinary development in the flexor and abductors. And a significant part WILL BE GENETIC. but still, NOT NORMAL. 20 years ago, quads with size would look chunky and unathletic. and not with refined muscle shape.

yes. the qualifier. like THASP (tennis steroid problem) one must realise that when the muscles are photographed or pictured, mid movement, when they are fire'ing, concentric explosive movements, they will look like horses' muscles mid flight.

art-353-svOCONNOR-300x0.jpg


carlton-chris-yarran.jpg
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Spider1964 said:
Word on the street... one of the Essendon coaches on the WADA banned gear is James Hird.

Is there any way that the AFL can retroactively take that '93 flag of the cheats? :D
SHANE


CARTER

michael caine to the rescue
Get+Carter.jpg
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
PCutter said:
....and they have an out if any receipts for PEDs are found in the club accounts..."that was just for the coaches"
the insulin was for our diabetic mechanic
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
sittingbison said:
it DOES look funny, but its not really informative. The game was amatuer, became semiu professional late 80s early 90s, didnt turn fully professional until 1996 from memory. What is more informative is to look at differences in the past 10 years, say the 1999 or 2003 World Cup and the 2011 World cup. A definite change in size and shape.

The BEST way though is to compare hakas ;)

Here is the 1979 version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBCpPGNDr1U

and here is the 2011 World Cup version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjVqZkDZrgg
but Haynzie is right.

everything you mention, it has an end point in the evolution in the human body. statistitians and sports science have focussed on the 100m for example. they looked at the progression, and believe the human form is at its zenith, and breaking the wr is just a random occurrence for the homo sapien.

after these rugga blokes are committed part-time athletes, the change to the physique has declining utilities. change to skull zero potential.

so, even with full time, rest n recuperation, hot cold bath cycles, massage, nutrition, coaching, exercise science, dietition, supplements like creative and whey protein and iron and b12,

there comes a point when the utility and improvement has plateaued, and only very marginal improvement is made, and not one, one can measure with their sight.

and when johnny beefheart at the local free weight bodybuilding gym, sports the same physique whilst he is an accountant during the day, and 1hr workouts at night, it is pretty clear

NOT NORMAL
 
Jun 13, 2009
180
0
0
PCutter said:
The reason so few have been implicated is likely that the investigation wasn't looking for footballers, it was looking at bikies/criminals, and they just happened to come across footballers as part of the investigation - then passed the info on to ASADA. If they actually targeted footballers the numbers would be huge

Ah, thanks for the clarification. Hopefully, there is a domino effect and one investigation will lead to another, however I'm not very confident in that happening.
 
May 3, 2010
2,662
0
0
If you want a good before and after.

Gareth Thomas of Wales is a good example of a roided up rugby player.

See if you can find some photos of him when he debuted aged 21/22 and when he finished his career.

04432-zoom.jpg


From skinny winger

to

6972493915a8974463640ml.jpg


Matthew 'Ape Man' Hayden is a roids boy, and always amazing how McGrath could bowl those very long spells. Oh yes, sorry, it was down to the superior training that the Aussies were doing.
 
May 3, 2010
2,662
0
0
Walsh did bowl longer spells than most, but this was later in his career and this was out of necessity rather than choice (after Bishop, Ambrose etc retired). I don't recall him bowling many 10+ over spells. Where as McGrath would thoughout his career.

McGrath bowled 35+ overs in an innings quite often especially compared to others. Those spells were often much longer than had been bowled by other bowlers.

It used to be considered that the most you could get out of a fast bowler a was about 8 overs. If you had a 4 man attack this would give you an hour on and an hour to recover assuming an over rate of about 16. (Windies were slow so we'll say low 14). To maintain velocity and accuracy requires stamina, McGrath had more of it than most, even at the end of a spell.

Four man attacks, 6 man batting line ups + batting keepers, so sides batting down to 7. Bowlers able to go on for longer and be effective even on the modern flat tracks. Hmmm, something doesn't quite fit here.

The only thing that would cause problems would be the occasional bout of roid rage.
 
May 3, 2010
2,662
0
0
Ferminal said:
Fast bowling, action is everything. Compare McGrath to someone like Tait and it's no wonder he had better longevity. That said most in Australia these days have very heavy actions.

That's the argument, but it breaks down because some bowlers had terrible actions - Marshall, Willis etc all had non-textbook actions.

An action in itself is not going to enable you to bowl 40+ overs in an innings regularly.
 
McGrath averaged 20 overs per innings.

No idea what the global average is but doesn't sound superhuman to me. Average innings was probably 70-80 then so not really more than his share of the workload. Might be better looking at a proven doper spinner who had injury troubles.
 
May 3, 2010
2,662
0
0
Nope, thinking of the same roid fueled bloke. He didn't bowl 40 overs as often as I thought but he did on a few occasions and he went over 30 and 35 plenty of times

4 x over 40
11 x over 35
31 x over 30

By my calculations that about 13% of his innings bowled. He was obviously not going to bowl 40 overs when doing the flat track bully thing against Bangladesh, England etc

What we don't have or I can't find is the length of spells, or distribution of overs between bowlers.

Given how all the talk was about the superior 'fitness' of the team was how they came to dominate, its perhaps worth looking at those teams with a more sceptical eye.

Hayden is the poster boy for roided up cricket. McGrath had plenty of roid rage moments as well and my memory is of a bowler who bowled long spells (unusual) and was as effective at the end of a spell as he was at the start (very unusual)
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,853
2
0
Mrs John Murphy said:
That's the argument, but it breaks down because some bowlers had terrible actions - Marshall, Willis etc all had non-textbook actions.

An action in itself is not going to enable you to bowl 40+ overs in an innings regularly.
Ryan Harris. mediocre medium pacer. then came back into state teams, forcing his way via one-day form, into national team, then into the team team via one-day national team form.


went from mediocre medium pacer at first class level, to leading a test team attack, and had got his top speed up to mid 140's, his fastest delivery of a match, pending on he speed of the pitch, could be 148kmph.

went from medium pacer, to a fastman. with the body of a front rower in rugby, from a tim henman.

NOT NORMAL.

that said, all the Aus bowlers and the batsmen are on the gear too. compare the test captains forehead to five years ago. NN