Chipist said:
I should point out I am am British. I am not wet behind the ears*, but I am looking to find reasons why $ky may be clean....
1) When does micro-dosing become not worth it? 1% extra?
2) I am led to understand that Sky did year round training, which other teams have not really done until now, could this be a factor?
3) If Sky were taking something that is not yet banned, how much is that cheating?
4) If you think Wigans is doped, do you think he was when winning track gold medals?
5) Are the sprinters doped? Do they need to be?
6) How would a generally clean TdF look? What sort of w/kg etc should we expect?
Are there so many (good) reasons to think they are definitely dirty you need reasons which favor they're clean?
1) Micro dosing would only cover recovery, no huge differences in ftp, of course in a stage race recovery can makes all the difference. Although we don't have 100% certainty they don't micro dose, they do get tested none the less. Didn't a certain contador get caught by this? I suspect this is the same for Frank this year. It would also be weird if all values of the bio pass didn't show any decline after a 3 week stage race.
2) Indeed nothing new here, but racing is the best training. It also means more possible doping controles and thus more risk if they would be trying to avoid that.
3) If something is not banned how could that be cheating? Are they on some magical wonderplant that nobody knows about? Most unlikely.
4) Thats the question I ask the biased clinics myself. If so, he's Armstrong 2.0 imo, deceiving people successfully over 14years already, chapeau Brad! Another but unimaginable option is the one of talent, most most most unlikely. No-one can be World champion on his 18th clean, winning 3 Olympic medals clean. Or, or .. they can but track cycling is kiddie play and you need no talent to win Olympic medals there.
5) They can but you can give a guy like, let's say Basso, all the dope you want, he still wouldn't win sprints.
6) The one we just saw doesn't look far from it imo, w/kg are way lower to acceptable levels. Micro dosing for recovery could still be an issue but look at 1) for that. Also, I mean, if they get more lower ... heck, I'll go Pro too, cheers!
To recap, if your only willing to accept they are dirty, you will. Same goes in the other direction. I like to look at the facts as they are at the moment, nothing so far raises a
sky high red flag to me (though I remain skeptical). Facts can change, and thus can judgement but I don't like to prejudge, that only makes my reasoning clouded.