- May 28, 2012
- 2,779
- 0
- 0
Netserk said:Purito isn't really multidimensional. He can sprint on an incline. Both in stage races and in one day races.
That's about it.
Isn't that what multidimensional means? Because GT's ≠ Monuments/races over 250kms.
Netserk said:Purito isn't really multidimensional. He can sprint on an incline. Both in stage races and in one day races.
That's about it.
Netserk said:Purito isn't really multidimensional. He can sprint on an incline. Both in stage races and in one day races.
That's about it.
No not really, since he does the same thing in both races.Pentacycle said:Isn't that what multidimensional means? Because GT's ≠ Monuments/races over 250kms.
Netserk said:No not really, since he does the same thing in both races.
Arredondo said:Good one.
He can win monuments, one-day races, stage races and finish on podium in GT's ==> multidimensional.
Nibbles can win GT's, but is a average time-trialist, isn't a fantastic descender (although everyone says it, he just take a lot of riks, and crashes of course), a good (but not spectaculair climber), and can't win big classics for the moment
My personal opinion; they are both spectaculair champions, and multidimensional. Haters silly downgrade qualities of champions, which is a pity
Most riders have one or two qualities which separate them from the rest. And Rodriguez has coupled his uphill sprinting to an increase in endurance. He has turned himself into a multidimensional rider, if you like.Netserk said:No not really, since he does the same thing in both races.
Ferminal said:I wouldn't have Nibali top3 but I guess that's what happens when your major achievement was six months ago![]()
willbick said:Wiggins is a big runner for his dominant Tour of Britain win and ITT WC silver.
Cance > TheRest said:A little underestimation of Nibali, dont you think? Afterall he has 2 podium finishes in monuments, is actually a good descender and certainly one of the best climbers out there
SafeBet said:Who are your top3?
Arredondo said:I'm just trying to make clear every rider does have one or two strong points. Nibbles isn't that explosive, so he has to attack to win races, he always does that if there is no other possibilty. Does that make him a onedimensional rider? Doesn't think so.
Jrod is a multidimensional rider, because he can win classics and finish on the podium on GT's. He wins the way he does. Of course he can attack from 50 k out, but which rider (except of Cancellara) can manage that kind of solo? Even nibbles can't.
A example: Nibbles finish 3rd in the Tour, due to a lot of attacks in the mountains. Purito finish 3rd in the tour, after following in the mountains and jumps clear with 1 k to go. Nibali multideminsional and Purito onedimensional?
Arredondo said:Good one.
He can win monuments, one-day races, stage races and finish on podium in GT's ==> multidimensional.
Nibbles can win GT's, but is a average time-trialist, isn't a fantastic descender (although everyone says it, he just take a lot of riks, and crashes of course), a good (but not spectaculair climber), and can't win big classics for the moment
My personal opinion; they are both spectaculair champions, and multidimensional. Haters silly downgrade qualities of champions, which is a pity
Netserk said:What is Cav then? He has won a monument, worlds, stage races and points jersey in all three GTs. Does that make him multidimensional?
Angliru said:How many other grand tour contenders even figure in the mix of a race like Milan-San Remo, let alone end up on the podium? For me Nibali is a throwback champion, racing like the heroes of old. He may not have won a classic (yet) but each year a new dimension in his arsenal emerges making him that much more formidable a rider.
Angliru said:How many other grand tour contenders even figure in the mix of a race like Milan-San Remo, let alone end up on the podium? For me Nibali is a throwback champion, racing like the heroes of old. He may not have won a classic (yet) but each year a new dimension in his arsenal emerges making him that much more formidable a rider.
Pentacycle said:What's so special about Italian GT specialists targeting MSR? Pellizotto, Garzelli and Scarponi did it too.
Arredondo said:I'm not saying he isn't a great champion. He is a true allrounder. But to say Jrod is a onedimensional rider, is ridiculous.
I'm convinced that guys like Jrod and Piti can finish on the podium in MSR to, just like Nibbles. I even give them more chance, because they are more explosive and do have a better sprint. It's just that they are not interested in La Primavera, although i think with the new route they might target it as well.
Nibbles racing like a champion in the old ages? Little bit overdone i think. He is a attacking rider, but the current hype is to much in my opinion.
IndianCyclist said:Jrod is a 2 dimensional rider hills & mountains.
Jrod cannot podium MSR simply as the he does not have enough power for the last flat kms. Even Nibali was ridden off his wheel by Cance. Jrod cannot sprint worth a dime. Look at WC.
Piti has the best chance because of his finishing sprint but he must reach there first. Nowadays he sucks wheels only.
Both are explosive only on the climbs and not on the flats. Sagan is more explosive on the short hills and Cav is an explosive sprinter.
Yup but he is closest one of the current crop of riders. Can you name any other?
Arredondo said:Why does Jrod can't finish on the podium in MSR? If he attacks on the Poggio, or on the steepest part of the Pompeia (15%), few can follow. He can't time trial, but he isn't a complete moron on the flat. If he's in a small group, he doesn't get dropped on the flat.
Jrod isn't a brilliant sprinter, but definitily better than Nibbles. He was tired in the finale of the worlds, after soloing for 10 k, that's not comparable with a sprint in some other race. He did a fairly nice sprint in Mende against Contador though.
Sagan is better than Jrod and Piti on 'Gilbert' type of climbs, but not on really steep climbs like Chieti and Huy, no way.
I don't understand your last sentence.
