A
Anonymous
Guest
Cobber said:His problem was with "Foodforthought", not you!![]()
Dyslexics of the world UNTIE!!!
Cobber said:His problem was with "Foodforthought", not you!![]()
Dr. Maserati said:...or probably not!...................
BanProCycling said:I see, you're were naive fan who didn't know about doping in cycling, and when discoverd it, felt like a lover betrayed. Well you shouldn't feel that way. Armstrong was likely doping long before he got cancer, so this doesn't have a large part to do with anything. Changing his mental approach, his training and yes, weight lose, is what turned him into a GC champion. If you look at GC contenders across the board, they all have to lose a lot of weight if they want to win. This is not some myth dreamt up by a PR company - just look at all of these guys. Coming from a power based sport like triathon, it was always likely that Armstrong would not reach his full potential in pro-cycling until later than most. Maybe it's time you dropped this doping obsession, which inevitably leads you to become a spin merchant that plays on rumour and hearsay, and take a more balanced, wider approach.
BanProCycling said:I see, you're were naive fan who didn't know about doping in cycling, and when discoverd it, felt like a lover betrayed. Well you shouldn't feel that way. Armstrong was likely doping long before he got cancer, so this doesn't have a large part to do with anything. Changing his mental approach, his training and yes, weight lose, is what turned him into a GC champion. If you look at GC contenders across the board, they all have to lose a lot of weight if they want to win. This is not some myth dreamt up by a PR company - just look at all of these guys. Coming from a power based sport like triathon, it was always likely that Armstrong would not reach his full potential in pro-cycling until later than most. Maybe it's time you dropped this doping obsession, which inevitably leads you to become a spin merchant that plays on rumour and hearsay, and take a more balanced, wider approach.
BanProCycling said:Why do you always try to personalise it? Nobody called anybody a liar. The doctor just said it didn't happen. You say he wasn't in the room. By that definition you and Betsy are calling the doctor a liar. That's a terrible thing to do to this life saving professional.
BanProCycling said:I see, you're were naive fan who didn't know about doping in cycling, and when discoverd it, felt like a lover betrayed. Well you shouldn't feel that way. Armstrong was likely doping long before he got cancer, so this doesn't have a large part to do with anything. Changing his mental approach, his training and yes, weight lose, is what turned him into a GC champion. If you look at GC contenders across the board, they all have to lose a lot of weight if they want to win. This is not some myth dreamt up by a PR company - just look at all of these guys. Coming from a power based sport like triathon, it was always likely that Armstrong would not reach his full potential in pro-cycling until later than most. Maybe it's time you dropped this doping obsession, which inevitably leads you to become a spin merchant that plays on rumour and hearsay, and take a more balanced, wider approach.
BanProCycling said:Why do you always try to personalise it? Nobody called anybody a liar. The doctor just said it didn't happen. You say he wasn't in the room. By that definition you and Betsy are calling the doctor a liar. That's a terrible thing to do to this life saving professional.
BanProCycling said:That's a trolling response. Who would he say this too?
BanProCycling said:That's a trolling response. Who would he say this too? Are you spinning it by saying he wasn't in the room because the conversation didn't happen? That's how these things can get twisted.
BanProCycling said:The fact that his body shape completely changed and his face when almost gaunt. It was quite obvious. Triathletes are a lot bigger on the upper body.
Digger said:Craig Nicholls wasn't in the room.
But what is interesting about what Nichols said, is that he would never consider asking a patient / athlete with cancer, if they had taken PEDs. Yet, Tim Herman (for BPC, that's Lance's lawyer), said that doctors at the hospital repeatedly asked him about PED usage.
BanProCycling said:The fact that his body shape completely changed and his face when almost gaunt. It was quite obvious. Triathletes are a lot bigger on the upper body.
and twitter!Digger said:So I can provide you with figures to say that the most he lost was 2 pounds. So I'll stick with the figures, you stick with the press releases from Lance and the anecdotal evidence from photographs.
BanProCycling said:Still hunting for that Lance fan he says he never doped, eh? Keep looking.
like to like. Lets see him in the same position he was sitting in Roubaix 2009, with his Beijing 2008 physique. Better yet, lets see him on the scales. They will know their weight to the nearest pound, but they are weaving a narrative for justifying results. See who the wikipedia link ISP is for altering his weight. The weight change came in early. I gotta doubt if Wiggins was 71 kg for the Giro.BanProCycling said:How did he fake his change in appearance? Is Wiggins also faking it now? How can they get away with doing that? Does David Blane help them?
Hugh Januss said:Those "other doctors" were spies hired by foodforthought.
lolBanProCycling said:Never done the twitter thing actually, so maybe I have missed out. Must try to get hooked up with that. Everybody seems to be talking about it.
BanProCycling said:That guy was banned - that's not people using multiple names. From what I saw he didn't deny doping either. He made some very sensible points. And how do you know he doesn't work shifts or something? So many assumptions.
Lets face it, anti Armstrong posts outweight pro-Armstrong posts about 100 to 1. Anyone who pops the little bubble is termed a troll and is made out to not have a clue what is going on. You've created your own planet here of special people who are 'in the know', and anyone who doesn't agree must be insane.
BanProCycling said:Much of your "facts" are based on disputed hearsay, therefore they are not "facts" in the traditional sense of the word. You believe all the most extreme anti Armstrong hearsay and rumour are "facts". That's your right, but don't pretend you have some special access to the truth that nobody else does. I fear you tread into that territory when you hang around with this crowd.
Race Radio said:Arbiter/BanProCycling does a great job of representing Livestrong Army. He should be allowed to Troll as much as he likes.
In the words of the great American Philosopher, Ted Nugent
"We need freedom of speech, otherwise it is harder to figure out who the idiots are"
Race Radio said:Arbiter/BanProCycling does a great job of representing Livestrong Army. He should be allowed to Troll as much as he likes.
In the words of the great American Philosopher, Ted Nugent
"We need freedom of speech, otherwise it is harder to figure out who the idiots are"