zigmeister said:ROFL...now THAT is genius.
So, the interns at the "teaching hospital" (most are by the way), with white coats and blue scrubs just come into a room of people to ask Lance, "Did you take PEDs?"
Yeah, the story gets more and more unbelievable and reasonable doubt is more than enough.
Imagine you are just sitting in a conference room, watching a football game with people, (they all agree to that), then, some white coats/blue scrubs people walk in and just ask, hey, we want to ask Lance some questions. Betsy insists they should leave??? Yeah, ok. Then Lance says OK, you can stay. So they just come right out and say "Lance, did you do PEDs, any drugs?"
The white coats/blue scrub kids walk out of the room and say, OK. Don't write this down, don't document anything, just a random PED inquiry at the local "teaching hospital."
Don't be alarmed Betsy....this is just your normal post surgery, have you taken any drugs, PEDs or anything like that. It is important for your Lance's recovery. By the way, let's not write this down, and his primary doctor wouldn't ever read this in his file, because it is all just for charity, the kids and teaching purposes.
Man...that is just silly sounding isn't it??
There's really just too much stupidity in there to answer but I'll try anyway.
1. NOT all hospitals are "teaching hospitals". Many utilize interns, but very few (typically those associated directly with a med school, introduce upper level med school students. In either case, they aren't "kids" they are in their mid to late twenties.
2. Exactly where does it say that they came in and asked only one question? Did you happen to read the part where they asked the other people present to leave the room, but that Lance said it was Ok for them to stay? How long did the doctors stay? Can you introduce anything to suggest that a more comprehensive questioning was performed?
3. If students/interns were on teaching rounds and coming through in groups, if the questions they ask are incorrect or not germane to the patient's case, or if they are duplicative of questions previously answered, then why is it so difficult to comprehend that not everything that was said down would be included in the official case records? Filling a file with repetetive or potentially useless information makes zero sense.
4. Do you know when Nichols became Armstrong's primary care oncologist? Was it before or after the diagnosis? Before or after the surgery? Was he Armstrong's doctor at the time that the hospital room incident allegedly occurred?
5. I missed where, in your little ad hominem against Betsy, where you included Stephanie McIlvain's name. Shouldn't we ask her the same questions? She said she heard the same thing.
6. Also, what happened to your "His mommy was there" argument? Did they produce Mom as a rebuttal witness? Seems pretty simple. Come to mention it, with all the people Betsy said WERE in the room, where are all their depositions? One would think there would be six or seven sworn depositions stating that none of the people Betsy said were there were even present, or if they were there that none of them heard the words she and Frankie (and Stephanie) heard.