Re:
macbindle said:
Anyway, everybody else, moving swiftly away from the litany of posts which demonstrate what it would look like if words could be vomited,
:lol: and you have the arrogance to whine about being called a sparky ? calling someone's words who simply did not agree 'vomiting'. sparky, btw, dont take the tag too seriously, it's just a common reference to someone who can not accept the elementary, obvious things.
not to fall for your cheap diversions, but i have to remind you and everyone who's still interested in why you resorted to clogging the thread.
i simply referred to the 'may survival' in a post above in the context of today's vote. to which there was a gushing flood of:1) i lack intricacies, b/c it is not about the 'may winning' (the words i never used); 2) i doubted the vote (which is clearly false) based on my ironic remark about the uk political turmoil. 3) the 2 votes are different (which was never a subject nor my intent in referencing the December vote.
i patiently explained where i was coming from...that i perfectly knew the may vote was not abou the pm vote but about her govt...explained the irony, explained the what mc misunderstood.
an offer of a lecture was put forward about the 'intricacies' instead of just letting the issue slide. or simply allowing for own misunderstanding of a poster..
we now have some space wasted b/c i did not feel the lecture was necessary. an offer to post the lecture and it's references publicly, with an option me having a choice, was referred to as my 'ugly english prose' and the 'vomiting'.
why is the poster resorting to his highness offers which are just the cheap masking of own lack of attention to context, why is such a poster still allowed to manipulate a non-issue ? cant accept being embarrassed ?
and here he bla