Gavandope said:
I would not say black - but mixed race for these power events from the West Indians who came here post ww2. I grew up with many here, they always were more athletic but they had a better far diet than us Caucasians. For example the staple West Indian rice and peas that usually accompanies meat or fish actually forms a complete protein with the two ingredients, whereas we had rubbish like chips, sausages, fried breakfasts, roast dinners and stodge! Not any more though thankfully, we have truly the tastes of our old empire nowadays.
The other legacy of empire is immigrants from Kenya then Somalia which brings mo farah into the mix! Genetics means that East African Homo sapiens by living at altitude have evolution on their side, never mind just Edgar and blood...
Sure mixed race. I wanted to simplify it.
I'm not necessarily sure that diet is the reason though - black sprinters have prevailed globally from before the time of processed food. I don't image white athletes spend much time in Burger King.
It's clearly genetic.
On the immigrant issue, there have been far fewer from East Africa than the Caribbean, so the impact there is less.
Some stats though about GB at the European championships. From 1990 to today 63 people have won an individual medal for GB.
Of those 56% were black or mixed race. And of those 76% were in 'sprint' races (400m or shorter including hurdles).
So far in this Euros, 54% of GBs medals have been from black/mixed race athletes in sprint races.
Also only 27% were women (not sure what that tells us).
For years Britain ruled the roost at distance running - from Bannister through to Cram. Those days are gone without someone with East African genetics.