Re:
djpbaltimore said:
The implications are different. It was much worse IMO to pass along bad info about someone in the public being 'hired' when no money changed hands than what an anonymous parent did to discover an athlete's stash of drugs. But, both examples are worth critiquing for the reasons that I already stated.
fair enough.
the devil's advocate is the receiver, in this case, lets make the receiver this amorphous Clinic TWELVE (Tarantino hello?)
so the receiver The Clinic TWELEVE, has had much propaganda heaped upon her amorphous body of dozen.
so the receive has the propaganda. Now, the receive seeks to parse the propaganda. And this forum has many sockpuppets***, and if JV was on here, it stands to reason that LiveStrong interns in Austin, and mebbe Brailsford had Murdocytes (my take on acolytes) here attempting to sway opinion. Well, if the Brailsford acolytes/murdochyets/bots bothered to check my posts, I started off a support and defense of Froome from (starting) when he was at Barloworld when everyone was so suspicious at that breakthru Vuelta2011.
The peloton never told the truth about doping, and the defenses when they have one non-negative are risible. The Floyd defense was risible with Arnie Baker over on DailyPeloton which went into full force immediately after the positive was confirmed.
There are a few on this forum, who have known others over numerous fora. BianchiGirl, RaceRadio, HelmutRoole, MrsJohnMurphy. We often had different handles across these different fora, but we would remember the other person's handle.
We have seen the BS been heaped on the receiver. This is The normalisation. If there sport deals in BS messaging and BS communicating and BursonMarsteller BS, the we attempt to make sense of the BS.
If you allowed Armstrong to wield it over everyone with the
extraordinary allegations require extraordinary proof aphorism... coulda been Carl Sagan... then we would never have a sufficient proof that satisfied the dilettantes in his fanbase and the RupertMurdochMedia, RMM. Armstrong could easily maitain his sleuthy logistics of deliveries by motoman, keep his blood and hormone levels beneath the positive test level, and smear Betsy Andreu in the media, because he has the voice, the media, the soapbox, the public strategies PR firm, and she has none of that just her home in the MidWest.
so that is the devil's advocate why posters seek to find a closer truth than the BS we are given. And my first post, the OP, made a defense, quite a comprehensive support of F-Dawg (eh Cound, you reading this?) and even doing the thread on Froome, ofcourse I knew he doped, ofcourse I knew Corti and Robertson ran dirty Barloworld teams, and also the feeder team of John Robertson Konica Minolta