• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Brits don't dope?

Page 110 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
the premise that taking PEDs make you of poor character is___F A L S E.

What makes you of poor character, is if you did not go to Gordonstoun, Harrow, Dragon, Westminster, Eten, Rugby and Charterhouse.

then you are of poor stock and character. Is___T R U E #eugenics #breeding #aristocracy


or Eton
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

kwikki said:
BYOP88 said:
kwikki said:
Can you point to which British track riders have appeared on any GT final GC in the last 10 years, other than Wiggins?

Or have you got some other criteria for "kicking ****"?

The guy everyone calls 'G'. So if those 2 can do it why haven't F/E the Aussie's, Kiwi's or Danish been able to get a rider to drop track weight(can't be that hard), maintain power(on the flat and ITT's) and climb as fast as guys who were mainlining EPO and win/top 15 a GT?

I'm guessing Sky and British cycling fans are hoping Kennaugh can do well in a GT too.

Those two can't do it. Geraint Thomas has never got in the GC of GT.

(Assuming you understand that GT= TdF, Giro, Vuelta. GC=top ten)

Wiggins is the only track rider to do so.

Mcgee came about 8th in the ~2005 Giro, or ~2004
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

Benotti69 said:
gazr99 said:
Benotti69 said:
gazr99 said:
Wiggins and Thomas are highly regarded as 2 of the most talented riders to come from Britain, who are known to have exceptionally big engines. Not a massive leap to see that they could survive in the mountains once they lost their track weight and have always trained road as well as track. Thomas was part of the academy which was based in the Italian hills.

Big engines fed by epo makes for good climbing. Big engines dont make for good climbing they make for average climbing if the climb is consistent and a rider can get into a rythym.

Wiggins transformed from grupetto fodder to GT winner, with PEDs not because he lost some weight. Stop with the myths.

So you're basically saying Wiggins decided he won't take PED's when everyone was doing it, he will wait for when the media are more focused on drugs on the peleton to start taking them.

It would be a shame if It turns out Wiggins did take PED's but I honestly get the feeling he didn't. I think focusing all his efforts on winning the tour, losing that extra weight and with a strong team behind him who played the tactics very well as well as the route suiting his strengths, all contributed to his success.

As blackcat says, Wiggins was probably on a PED program for his track and what Cofidis gave him or expected of him was little. But once he decided to up his road ambitions well the Sky was the limit!

Wiggins did take PEDs, there is no doubt about it. You dont win a 3 week GT against a Ferrari client (Nibali) without PEDs no matter how much weight you lose.

The idea the people think riders can race every day for 3 weeks, without dope, give over!

Well there is doubt, otherwise there would be evidence all over the place but all there is, is conspiracy theory opinions
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

gazr99 said:
Well there is doubt, otherwise there would be evidence all over the place but all there is, is conspiracy theory opinions

If Armstrong is nice to Floyd, if Nowitski or Novitski never did the Fed investigation, if Birotte never gets the brief, if Tygart never opens the investigation...

all these things are plausible, the stars ALIGNED against Lance. He was pretty unlucky.

If Lance is not exposed, the Empire crew behind Froome and Wiggins and Gordonstoun and MUscular Christianity have a USPS type hubris.

At the moment, empire crew merely flirts with Yankee hubris.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

gazr99 said:
Benotti69 said:
gazr99 said:
Benotti69 said:
gazr99 said:
Wiggins and Thomas are highly regarded as 2 of the most talented riders to come from Britain, who are known to have exceptionally big engines. Not a massive leap to see that they could survive in the mountains once they lost their track weight and have always trained road as well as track. Thomas was part of the academy which was based in the Italian hills.

Big engines fed by epo makes for good climbing. Big engines dont make for good climbing they make for average climbing if the climb is consistent and a rider can get into a rythym.

Wiggins transformed from grupetto fodder to GT winner, with PEDs not because he lost some weight. Stop with the myths.

So you're basically saying Wiggins decided he won't take PED's when everyone was doing it, he will wait for when the media are more focused on drugs on the peleton to start taking them.

It would be a shame if It turns out Wiggins did take PED's but I honestly get the feeling he didn't. I think focusing all his efforts on winning the tour, losing that extra weight and with a strong team behind him who played the tactics very well as well as the route suiting his strengths, all contributed to his success.

As blackcat says, Wiggins was probably on a PED program for his track and what Cofidis gave him or expected of him was little. But once he decided to up his road ambitions well the Sky was the limit!

Wiggins did take PEDs, there is no doubt about it. You dont win a 3 week GT against a Ferrari client (Nibali) without PEDs no matter how much weight you lose.

The idea the people think riders can race every day for 3 weeks, without dope, give over!

Well there is doubt, otherwise there would be evidence all over the place but all there is, is conspiracy theory opinions

But there is evidence all over the place. Hell Walsh used the same evidence about Sky it to write books about Armstrong.

TeamSky is currently the goose laying golden eggs in the sport. No one wants to kill it when it is hard to find sponsors. Instead of improving the sport and attracting sponsors to a clean well run sport, they'd rather feed the goose and feather their own nests.
 
There is evidence all over the place. That's why the overwhelming majority of cycling fans (80% in countries like Denmark) are convinced Froome is doping and why people like *** Pound and Ashenden are saying the sport is as bad as ever.

If people want to post factual untruths like - there is no evidence, well, all's the best to them
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

Benotti69 said:
gazr99 said:
Benotti69 said:
gazr99 said:
Benotti69 said:
Wiggins and Thomas are highly regarded as 2 of the most talented riders to come from Britain, who are known to have exceptionally big engines. Not a massive leap to see that they could survive in the mountains once they lost their track weight and have always trained road as well as track. Thomas was part of the academy which was based in the Italian hills.

Big engines fed by epo makes for good climbing. Big engines dont make for good climbing they make for average climbing if the climb is consistent and a rider can get into a rythym.

Wiggins transformed from grupetto fodder to GT winner, with PEDs not because he lost some weight. Stop with the myths.

So you're basically saying Wiggins decided he won't take PED's when everyone was doing it, he will wait for when the media are more focused on drugs on the peleton to start taking them.

It would be a shame if It turns out Wiggins did take PED's but I honestly get the feeling he didn't. I think focusing all his efforts on winning the tour, losing that extra weight and with a strong team behind him who played the tactics very well as well as the route suiting his strengths, all contributed to his success.

As blackcat says, Wiggins was probably on a PED program for his track and what Cofidis gave him or expected of him was little. But once he decided to up his road ambitions well the Sky was the limit!

Wiggins did take PEDs, there is no doubt about it. You dont win a 3 week GT against a Ferrari client (Nibali) without PEDs no matter how much weight you lose.

The idea the people think riders can race every day for 3 weeks, without dope, give over!

Well there is doubt, otherwise there would be evidence all over the place but all there is, is conspiracy theory opinions

But there is evidence all over the place. Hell Walsh used the same evidence about Sky it to write books about Armstrong.

TeamSky is currently the goose laying golden eggs in the sport. No one wants to kill it when it is hard to find sponsors. Instead of improving the sport and attracting sponsors to a clean well run sport, they'd rather feed the goose and feather their own nests.[/quote]

Show us this hard evidence that Wiggins took PED's then
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Visit site
The Hitch said:
There is evidence all over the place. That's why the overwhelming majority of cycling fans (80% in countries like Denmark) are convinced Froome is doping and why people like **** Pound and Ashenden are saying the sport is as bad as ever.

If people want to post factual untruths like - there is no evidence, well, all's the best to them

There is evidence where? Amazing how the evidence thread is like a ghost town and is rarely updated considering all of this evidence that is out there
 
Apr 3, 2016
1,508
0
0
Visit site
I think it's more a question of there being a smoking gun, and a body, but nobody has found the bullets yet.

Of course they are employing drugs. Why wouldn't they? Their livelihood depends on it, and as Blackcat demonstrated the odds of it all going horribly wrong are small. Armstrong was only outed because he and Bruyneel made a decision to not employ Landis. They would never have imagined that Landis would turn on them.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

BYOP88 said:
The guy everyone calls 'G'. So if those 2 can do it why haven't F/E the Aussie's, Kiwi's or Danish been able to get a rider to drop track weight(can't be that hard), maintain power(on the flat and ITT's) and climb as fast as guys who were mainlining EPO and win/top 15 a GT?

I'm guessing Sky and British cycling fans are hoping Kennaugh can do well in a GT too.

I dont think it is that easy to drop 10% of your bodyweight, when you are a lean professional cyclist to begin with, you aint exactly Maggy Bagstedt or Dario Pieri or John Degenkolb or Jan Ullrich. You are not fatter than a pro rata Merckx Armstrong Lemond or Hinault. They all carried fit and lean muscle to go along with their lungs.

remember when the 5'9" Kennaugh lost 10lbs from a March World Track Champs to the start of the Tour, then Brailsford said this was just caloric deficit. Which was the #bovinescatology propaganda answer.

you need to use the pharmacy ^see: my reckoning above
then you need to work on diet, or the rectal tube infusion...

it takes alot of discipline. significant discipline.

It helps to come from a northern hemisphere state. even more if it aint across the Atlantic. Most cyclists have a commitment and discipline to the arduousness of the sport. but if you take them out of their culture, into a different language, outside their friends and family, well, the Brits dont have ALOT of these hurdles Kiwis, Canucks, Aussies and Yanks have to navigate. They are closer to home, in Europe even Brexit,

The second tier GC riders will be queuing up for the next leadership in the TdF.

Kennaugh, G, Adam and Simon Yates will see the financial heft Brailsford wields, Gerry for all his generosity, can't go overs, or pay 5million GBP for a Tour de France winner. Brailsford can do a knockout offer for the twins.

And Brailsford will be playing his card in politics101, motivate froome with internal competition, and indications they will seek to contract the twins.

and as an Aussie nationalist, I hope the twins stay with Jayco Gerry, because they know the Australians run a clean team

#Poe's_law
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re:

kwikki said:
I think it's more a question of there being a smoking gun, and a body, but nobody has found the bullets yet.

Of course they are employing drugs. Why wouldn't they? Their livelihood depends on it, and as Blackcat demonstrated the odds of it all going horribly wrong are small. Armstrong was only outed because he and Bruyneel made a decision to not employ Landis. They would never have imagined that Landis would turn on them.

yeah nah yeah...

i am sorry to say it, but if you are an A personility type competitive professional sportsman, you would have to be an idiot NOT to dope. It is a very easy question, to dope, or not to dope.

If you love the sport, and dont wish to dope, you can compete in Cat 1 or A grade, or domestic professional racing, for the intrinsic motivation... I dont say you have to dope to make cycling the centrepiece of your life and profession. You just dont get the big bucks on the continent.

If you want the big bucks, you need to take the plunge, not my rules.

Insider v Outsider

Yesalis and Hoberman and Savulescu and Goldman and Catlin and Hardie and other academics have studied this...
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

gazr99 said:
Show us this hard evidence that Wiggins took PED's then

would you be a willing consumer of indirect evidence and understanding of human psychology and competitive Type A personalities thrown into the cauldron of the professional peloton where PEDs are the default position, where the Wattage improvement in the third week on the final ascent of the queen stage may be 20%, that marginal gains are not the rounding error on a comprehensive Ferrari program, and when the Olympic events in T&F and swimming and trackcycling are separated by a fraction of 1%. say... 0.03%.

indirect evidence, sentient brain, is compelling.
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

blackcat said:
gazr99 said:
Show us this hard evidence that Wiggins took PED's then

would you be a willing consumer of indirect evidence and understanding of human psychology and competitive Type A personalities thrown into the cauldron of the professional peloton where PEDs are the default position, where the Wattage improvement in the third week on the final ascent of the queen stage may be 20%, that marginal gains are not the rounding error on a comprehensive Ferrari program, and when the Olympic events in T&F and swimming and trackcycling are separated by a fraction of 1%. say... 0.03%.

indirect evidence, sentient brain, is compelling.

So much wrong there indirect says it all. You are stereotyping athletes with the same personality type and presuming there is definitely PED's in peleton to prove that there is PED's. To be fair when was Wiggins data seen for people to say there was a 20% wattage improvement
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

gazr99 said:
blackcat said:
gazr99 said:
Show us this hard evidence that Wiggins took PED's then

would you be a willing consumer of indirect evidence and understanding of human psychology and competitive Type A personalities thrown into the cauldron of the professional peloton where PEDs are the default position, where the Wattage improvement in the third week on the final ascent of the queen stage may be 20%, that marginal gains are not the rounding error on a comprehensive Ferrari program, and when the Olympic events in T&F and swimming and trackcycling are separated by a fraction of 1%. say... 0.03%.

indirect evidence, sentient brain, is compelling.
 
The whole British Cycling / Team Sky success story is 25 years old this year. Who would have thought the tireless amount of work Keen did at Bishop Otter College on his research programme on the physical limitations to pursuit racing and he continued with Boardman from 1987 to 1992 to get that first ever British medal in an Olympic cycling event would then develop into the U23 Road Accademy Brailsford & Ellingworth started in 2004 and just 6 years later would start Team Sky in 2010 and 2 years after that a win in Tour de France with a pursuit rider originally coached by Keen using his methods and research programme on the physical limitations to pursuit racing? What a waste of 21 years, when all they needed to do was pop a few weight loss pills down Wiggins throat and rock up in a shiny bus and win Tour de France all along!
 
Re:

kwikki said:
I think it's more a question of there being a smoking gun, and a body, but nobody has found the bullets yet.

Of course they are employing drugs. Why wouldn't they? Their livelihood depends on it, and as Blackcat demonstrated the odds of it all going horribly wrong are small. Armstrong was only outed because he and Bruyneel made a decision to not employ Landis. They would never have imagined that Landis would turn on them.

It was really a culmination of years of corruption/burned athletes and cycling insiders. Had Armstrong just stayed retired McQuaid would still probably be President.

Define "smoking gun." There were countless demands for a "smoking gun" with Armstrong for years. And, to date, Armstrong has still never tested positive.

The cracks in the sporting fraud schemes in the UK are beginning to show. I think it's going to happen much slower than it did for Armstrong and the UCI, but, it will fall apart and the UCI will, again, be implicated.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

gazr99 said:
So much wrong there indirect says it all. You are stereotyping athletes with the same personality type and presuming there is definitely PED's in peleton to prove that there is PED's. To be fair when was Wiggins data seen for people to say there was a 20% wattage improvement

I was not talking about Brad, I was giving you a rule of thumb control sample, third week GT and Tour de France queen stage. might get 20% and time to exhaustion,

definitely NOT Brailsford marginal gains
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

DirtyWorks said:
kwikki said:
I think it's more a question of there being a smoking gun, and a body, but nobody has found the bullets yet.

Of course they are employing drugs. Why wouldn't they? Their livelihood depends on it, and as Blackcat demonstrated the odds of it all going horribly wrong are small. Armstrong was only outed because he and Bruyneel made a decision to not employ Landis. They would never have imagined that Landis would turn on them.

It was really a culmination of years of corruption/burned athletes and cycling insiders. Had Armstrong just stayed retired McQuaid would still probably be President.

Define "smoking gun." There were countless demands for a "smoking gun" with Armstrong for years. And, to date, Armstrong has still never tested positive.

The cracks in the sporting fraud schemes in the UK are beginning to show. I think it's going to happen much slower than it did for Armstrong and the UCI, but, it will fall apart and the UCI will, again, be implicated.

gazr99 wants the smoking gun like the non prosecution of PaulaPaulaPaula Radcliffe.

if the duck quacks like a duck and tortured metaphors and analogies where you have conflated your poulet and poultry, does the duck really dope and quack?

no, INNOCENT!
 
Jul 20, 2015
653
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

blackcat said:
gazr99 said:
So much wrong there indirect says it all. You are stereotyping athletes with the same personality type and presuming there is definitely PED's in peleton to prove that there is PED's. To be fair when was Wiggins data seen for people to say there was a 20% wattage improvement

I was not talking about Brad, I was giving you a rule of thumb control sample, third week GT and Tour de France queen stage. might get 20% and time to exhaustion,

definitely NOT Brailsford marginal gains

Yes 20% improvement would definitely raise eyebrows. However, it would have to be in context the latest tactic that seems to be bring implemented is training to be strong in the 3rd week not just survive. So staying quiet early on, conserving energy to be prepared for that final week
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Visit site
Re:

kwikki said:
I think it's more a question of there being a smoking gun, and a body, but nobody has found the bullets yet.

Of course they are employing drugs. Why wouldn't they? Their livelihood depends on it, and as Blackcat demonstrated the odds of it all going horribly wrong are small. Armstrong was only outed because he and Bruyneel made a decision to not employ Landis. They would never have imagined that Landis would turn on them.

They never imagined Landis would gain any credence and that is would snowball.

"they liked their credibility", "they had done too much for too many people"

Sky are a British team and part of the establishment, TeamGB. If they dont upset too many people, all should be rosy in an Englishman's garden.
 
May 26, 2009
4,114
0
0
Visit site
Re:

samhocking said:
The whole British Cycling / Team Sky success story is 25 years old this year. Who would have thought the tireless amount of work Keen did at Bishop Otter College on his research programme on the physical limitations to pursuit racing and he continued with Boardman from 1987 to 1992 to get that first ever British medal in an Olympic cycling event would then develop into the U23 Road Accademy Brailsford & Ellingworth started in 2004 and just 6 years later would start Team Sky in 2010 and 2 years after that a win in Tour de France with a pursuit rider originally coached by Keen using his methods and research programme on the physical limitations to pursuit racing? What a waste of 21 years, when all they needed to do was pop a few weight loss pills down Wiggins throat and rock up in a shiny bus and win Tour de France all along!

If cycling is clean how are times the same as the times knocked out in the EPO days? The Tour de France is roughly 2,000 miles a year yet the time it takes is roughly the same, surely in clean cycling it should take longer to complete 2,000 miles than it took in the dark, dirty EPO days?

If we look at a race like Paris Roubaix, in the famous 1999 edition they raced 273km in 6h 44'15'', this year they raced 257km in 5h51'53'' it can't be down to tailwinds, surely?

So what changed in the peloton that's made it clean(ER) but they can still race as fast/faster than the great days of EPO? I don't think it's down to evolution.

PS this isn't a dig at Brits. Just it seems you may believe that cycling is clean/cleaner than it once was. So I'd genuinely like to hear your theory/answer on how that happened. :)
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Visit site
Re:

samhocking said:
The whole British Cycling / Team Sky success story is 25 years old this year. Who would have thought the tireless amount of work Keen did at Bishop Otter College on his research programme on the physical limitations to pursuit racing and he continued with Boardman from 1987 to 1992 to get that first ever British medal in an Olympic cycling event would then develop into the U23 Road Accademy Brailsford & Ellingworth started in 2004 and just 6 years later would start Team Sky in 2010 and 2 years after that a win in Tour de France with a pursuit rider originally coached by Keen using his methods and research programme on the physical limitations to pursuit racing? What a waste of 21 years, when all they needed to do was pop a few weight loss pills down Wiggins throat and rock up in a shiny bus and win Tour de France all along!

EPO is how old? 25 years.
 
Mar 13, 2009
16,854
1
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

gazr99 said:
blackcat said:
gazr99 said:
So much wrong there indirect says it all. You are stereotyping athletes with the same personality type and presuming there is definitely PED's in peleton to prove that there is PED's. To be fair when was Wiggins data seen for people to say there was a 20% wattage improvement

I was not talking about Brad, I was giving you a rule of thumb control sample, third week GT and Tour de France queen stage. might get 20% and time to exhaustion,

definitely NOT Brailsford marginal gains

Yes 20% improvement would definitely raise eyebrows. However, it would have to be in context the latest tactic that seems to be bring implemented is training to be strong in the 3rd week not just survive. So staying quiet early on, conserving energy to be prepared for that final week


again, ceteris paribus, all-things-equal.

there are numerous flaws. Athletes have pursued numerous race strategies to be the strongest over the entire three week bloc, not one particular week isolated, the strategy is to manage your form for the three weeks, and it may mean being stronger or less strong on particular mountain passes like pyrenees or alps.

it is a happy medium balance, the tactics are fungible. Armstrong and Stapleton no doubt would have seen the race route, and then worked out where they could manage their form, and compete, triangulate their tactics to Mayo, or Basso, or his biggest threat. This may mean, making sure he was strongest in Pyrenees. Because Mayo may be able to do more damage there, or on dHuez. Or Lance may just stuff that strategy, and work out his best, and where his peak race was best suited. It could be in a second week timetrial.

I will say however, the final week has much to do with the intra tour doping logistics managed, getting the blood bags, and Leinders there for the cortisone insulin testo hgh IGF etc and epo.

GameTheory, often your tactics wont merely include yourself, they will include your riding to shut down, or prevent your competitor from beating you.

Why did Froome go to grab time early? Worried about Quintana, does not give a $h!t about anyone esle, he just wishes to gut NQ off at the pass. So his ~20seconds when you add in his bonifications, could be a negative economy, we just wait to see how much energy OVERandABOVE he expended to get his 20secs.

You do nothing in isolation. It is not a strategy to peak in the third week. This underestimates Froome and Brailsford and their directeurs and their intelligence, they will have scoped most of the potential scenarios. And they will have considered risk management and unknowables(Rummy rumsfeld) and to be prepared for when $h!t gets real on the road, and something occurs.

edit:meant, "cut NQ off at the pass" not "gut NQ off at the pass", but that works too, mebbe better, like Ned Beattie and the Mountain Men reaming him male on male in Deliverance.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

gazr99 said:
blackcat said:
gazr99 said:
So much wrong there indirect says it all. You are stereotyping athletes with the same personality type and presuming there is definitely PED's in peleton to prove that there is PED's. To be fair when was Wiggins data seen for people to say there was a 20% wattage improvement

I was not talking about Brad, I was giving you a rule of thumb control sample, third week GT and Tour de France queen stage. might get 20% and time to exhaustion,

definitely NOT Brailsford marginal gains

Yes 20% improvement would definitely raise eyebrows. However, it would have to be in context the latest tactic that seems to be bring implemented is training to be strong in the 3rd week not just survive. So staying quiet early on, conserving energy to be prepared for that final week

Froome has done no staying quiet, not conserved any energy so how can he be prepared for the final week?

Yesterday he followed every attack up the final climb. Day before he attacked and rode away on the descent and kept the chasing GC contenders at bay.
 

TRENDING THREADS