The Hitch said:His attack was still a way from the top of the climb. And do you seriously think that sticking behind Maxime Monfort is like staying in a peloton.
People get dropped in team time trials with 9 riders. Andy almost got dropped in the Les Essarts one despite taking no pulls.
And yet, when it comes to downplaying Andys accomplishments, at all costs, sticking behind Monfort on the downhill and flat into Galibier, is some free ride that wastes no energy, right?
People get dropped in team time trials because:
1) They actually ride a lot harder in team time trials because only the time of the fifth rider matters.
2) some people can't handle the sudden change of tempo that happens when a new rider gets on the front in team time trials making them get dropped.
3) Some people sacrifice them self completely before the finish line because only the time of the fifth rider matters.
4) Some people aren't used to ride on a time trial bike
5) Some people crash
6) Some people just suck.
The peloton chasing behind Andy on the Galibier stage wasn't that big anyway.
Like duh, Andy was more tired then the rest. But it still doesn't make him the best climber. What he did on Galibier was a tactical win. You can't say that Andy was a better climber than Cadel Evans on that stage. I doubt Andy would have dropped Cadel Evans if they were together at the Galibier.
As for sticking behind Monfort being the same as being in the peloton. Well, that all depends on how the wind was that day If it was headwind and he was sticking Behind Monfort it's practically the same as staying in the peloton. Andy wasn't consuming more energy than Cadel Evans on the descend for example. His 24% of the work done before the final climb is him consuming more energy. But that's hardly a 50k time trial as you make it out to be