- Aug 12, 2009
- 3,639
- 0
- 0
Mountain Goat said:I think this is more indicative of how 60 minutes portrayed the riders. I doubt Rogers and Evans had much input into what was shown. The producers would have said, Cadel your the top dog, show us you cars, and to rogers, well we need a different angle, do a family piece on him.
They wanted to show two different sides of the story. That riders can be family men, and they can earn lot's of money if they are searching for a Tour crown. Any television producer would not have shown two stories about the exact same thing (i.e. show Rogers with money, and Evans with money OR Rogers with family and Evans with family), so for me, I didn't read anything into this.
Cadel has shown a lot through SBS pieces that he is very down to earth, supports Tibet, Indigenous Australia and various other causes, and more than ever he is portrayed as a loveable son (by his mum) and a caring husband (by his wife) and we all know he loves his dog too.
I think it's interesting about how you portray that piece, but I have to disagree on that one. personally, I think he is loaded up with $$$ at the moment, and the many many interviews he's done this week suggests he wants to be a winner, not a rich second place getter. He said on ONE HD on thursday that he hasn't acheived his goals as a road racer yet. It's fair to say he has achieved his monetary goals at this stage in his career, so I really do think its about team support than money
I concur, it is easy to jump to one viewpoint. Mine sways often on trivial affairs with new information. But I did highlight that Evans is intelligent. Sixty minutes are masters of portraying a person/subject in a light that is more or less predetermined. Cadel should have known this, but we all know he isn't the most media savy sportsman out there and struggles at the best of times at expressing himself. I only wanted to highlight the contrasts, truth and accuracy is not an issue to news agencies.
I'll agree with Cadel already being cashed up. I think he may buy out his own contract to go to the right team. But if it is BMC (a very likely option) I think he'd only sign if they were racing the Tour, given his statements in the last week. It would not make sense to not have that guarantee. Surprisingly Cadel and OPL have performed very well the last 2 months. I can'y help but feel all parties are happy with this outcome.
Issoisso's bit about the 1.1 million contract is spot on. In Euros that equates to about Aus $2 million given the exchange rate has hovered around 60 cents in the dollar for the last few years. The $2 million figure has been thrown around for a while. Any person signing a new contract will look to get the best going rate for their expertise and skills. Cadel and his manager will aim to do this.
Perhaps instead of saying what we think he is worth on the open markets salary wise we could say how much we'd actually pay him to ride if we were a DS.
BMC is a good fit. Katusha? They have cash and Lampre has space and some good support riders joining the team. All 3 lack a good consistent GC rider. Cervelo are a minor option, but I think they are full. Their Tour option looks like Hushovd for green. Sky? Not a chance in hell, the same with HTC. Sky want a British GC rider, ala Wiggins and have said as much all year. Garmin, doubt it. Should find out in a few weeks. This however doesn't change anything about Cadel's chances to win le Tour. Won't make a difference at all.
Will we get to hear some aussie's bagging OPL next year? I'll be shocked if we don't.