- Oct 27, 2009
- 133
- 0
- 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Publicus
Then what would you suggest? That they let bygones be bygones?
Count me in bro you'd already said it all.
The UCI doesnt have the credibility and there are lots of dopers out there that should have been banned and yet they go unpunished.Lets be fair.Valverde is an excellent rider,imo.Banning him just to satisfy a few will not do good.Let bygones be bygones.Lets start all over again.
Originally Posted by Publicus
Then what would you suggest? That they let bygones be bygones?
ak-zaaf said:Yes. If a case drags along for this long a suspension makes no sense. He's won a monument and a GT since the sh|tstorm started.
There isn't a good alternative because the UCI is full of idiots, the ASO only cares about money and individual countries can't get along and make the rules the same regarding doping.
That is not the fault of some guy who was on a team program years ago.
I'm all for catching dopers. But not after so many years and not randomly.
Puerto should be closed if the Spaniards won't give every last detail to the 'doping-investigators'.
Not many will agree with me, but I think this has gone on for far too long and a suspension for Valverde will not make things better for anyone.
Count me in bro you'd already said it all.
The UCI doesnt have the credibility and there are lots of dopers out there that should have been banned and yet they go unpunished.Lets be fair.Valverde is an excellent rider,imo.Banning him just to satisfy a few will not do good.Let bygones be bygones.Lets start all over again.