Of course, there is proof of CLEN, but the CLEN by itself doesn't proof blooddoping, we all agree.Berzin said:Yes, it's all proof in the court of public opinion. All of it is proof without a reasonable doubt, as far as conjecture goes.
It's just that we're facing a couple of clearcut indications (you mention most of them) which, taken together, lead to the common-sensical suspition that AC has indeed been doing blooddoping.
No proof, just clues we're talking about. Don't see why you pretend as if these clues aren't any.
And with all due respect, the HUMO story makes five times more sense than AC's steak-story.