• We're giving away a Cyclingnews water bottle! Find out more here!

Carlos Betancur discussion thread

Page 90 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re:

yaco said:
The more pressing question is if he continues his current vein of form into 2017 ( which will make it 3 years ) Will he a WT contract for 2017.
Probably not, but his name alone would still be worth a decent contract at the proconti level I think. It's too bad he was not demoted last year to a proconti or conti level team, that might have been just the spark he needed to regain his top form. Maybe I'll be wrong about him and he'll have a great season, in which case I'll be perfectly content with that. :)
 
Re: Re:

Irondan said:
yaco said:
The more pressing question is if he continues his current vein of form into 2017 ( which will make it 3 years ) Will he a WT contract for 2017.
Probably not, but his name alone would still be worth a decent contract at the proconti level I think. It's too bad he was not demoted last year to a proconti or conti level team, that might have been just the spark he needed to regain his top form. Maybe I'll be wrong about him and he'll have a great season, in which case I'll be perfectly content with that. :)
Think he may pick up a one year WT contract, but will not be surprised if rides at the PCT Level.
 
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
 
If there was a real hype for Colombian riders in this forum we would have crashed it many times long time ago. At least for the last 3 years.

LOL.

As for the hype for this rider, well we continue to discuss it because is mostly negative and not positive. I guess we like to talk about bad news more than about good news. Sorry about that.
 
Re:

Escarabajo said:
If there was a real hype for Colombian riders in this forum we would have crashed it many times long time ago. At least for the last 3 years.

LOL.

As for the hype for this rider, well we continue to discuss it because is mostly negative and not positive. I guess we like to talk about bad news more than about good news. Sorry about that.
You nailed it. Malevolence :D

You can see it also on Sagan´s or Froome´s thread. The bigger failure the more comments in their thread.
 
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
Oh, come on. That's a complete exaggeration. You don't hear all that much about Portuguese riders (though maybe a bit more than they deserve given the level of riders) but the talk about Colombian riders has been mostly justified. We went from guys like Duque and Serpa to an age where Colombians are winning and competing to win the biggest races on the calendar. It would be similar if a bunch of Malaysians, Ugandans, or Icelanders suddenly started putting up similar results.

Let's be honest, people are fascinated with Betancur because he burst on the scene in some really big races early in his career and has been a trainwreck since. He somehow performs (at times) despite having a different build from most guys and always has drama surrounding him. It's just human nature that he gets more discussion than his results merit.
 
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
The Colombian riders are pretty deserving of the attention that they get but this Portuguese phenomenon that you speak of I can't really say that I've noticed it at all. If we have many Portuguese posters on here it's only natural that they discuss their nation's riders often. Having these posters providing insights that we may not always have at our disposal otherwise is a gift IMO.
 
Angliru said:
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
The Colombian riders are pretty deserving of the attention that they get but this Portuguese phenomenon that you speak of I can't really say that I've noticed it at all. If we have many Portuguese posters on here it's only natural that they discuss their nation's riders often. Having these posters providing insights that we may not always have at our disposal otherwise is a gift IMO.
I think this is the wrong diagnosis. There are many things at play (among them, that GC riders get more play than classics' men), but one of the main issues is hype. People here love drama, they love to hype up riders as soon as they show any promise and then knock them down as soon as they show the first signs of not being able to live up to said hype. So riders like Joe Dombrowski (6 pages), Ruben Fernandez (3 pages), Egan Bernal (8 pages!) or Wilco Kelderman (35 pages!!!) get a lot more discussion without a single WorldTour win than someone like Darwin Atapuma (1 page) or Gianni Meersman (no thread :( ). Similarly, Richie Porte gets about as much discussion as Alejandro Valverde.

As I've stated, I think Betancur is a perfect storm of sorts. A rider whose strengths and early results matches our dreams, and whose present and weaknesses matches our realities.
 
Feb 21, 2017
757
0
0
Obviously it's probably just a mixture of frustration and shadenfreude. Frustration in that he's wasting potential, and schadenfruede in that he's doing in it in such a spectacular manner, with fans still maintaining hope of redemption. Trainwreck, meet rubber-neckers. I must admit I find it fascinating, and am chalking that up to a personal character flaw.

edited for clarity
 
Re: Re:

SKSemtex said:
Escarabajo said:
If there was a real hype for Colombian riders in this forum we would have crashed it many times long time ago. At least for the last 3 years.

LOL.

As for the hype for this rider, well we continue to discuss it because is mostly negative and not positive. I guess we like to talk about bad news more than about good news. Sorry about that.
You nailed it. Malevolence :D

You can see it also on Sagan´s or Froome´s thread. The bigger failure the more comments in their thread.
LOL and who has the most comments in their thread? LOL
 
Jan 8, 2013
393
0
4,280
Angliru said:
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
The Colombian riders are pretty deserving of the attention that they get but this Portuguese phenomenon that you speak of I can't really say that I've noticed it at all. If we have many Portuguese posters on here it's only natural that they discuss their nation's riders often. Having these posters providing insights that we may not always have at our disposal otherwise is a gift IMO.
Although I'm biased to the colombian threads (I will point out that the ratio of colombian wt riders to wins is one of the highest, if not the highest, maybe Slovakia has a higher ratio) but the case of Betancur comes down to what is really seen as raw talent vs wasted opportunities.
In 2011 he won Giro Dell'Emilia and was 'on the map'. 2012 he had that big fight where Liquigas said they signed him and Acqua & Sapone said that no, he was with them. Betancur stayed with Acqua & Sapone. At this point, we knew he was 'special', that teams were fighting for him, but also 'special' because, c'mon, who signs two different contracts with their own clauses? Red Flag goes up.
2013 came, he goes to Ag2r (another red flag. two italian teams fighting for him so he goes to a french team with a huge language barrier?) and he gets 3rd at Fleche Wallonne, 4th at Liege Bastone Liege, and 5th at the Giro while getting the white jersey. 7th at Pais Vasco. But then Vuelta a España comes and we hear he just doesn't want to ride anymore for the year. Red Flag again.
2014. We hear the rumors..we see his WEIGHT at Paris-Nice. Looks like the team isn't happy, we all hear that he doesn't have the same shape, that no one wants to work for him, yet he still MANAGES TO WIN BACK TO BACK STAGES and the GC!!. Raw talent. Only person that I know that had THAT much raw talent was Sagan, where he was winning everywhere. Yes, Sagan is the GOAT, but he started with similar hype of raw talent. We all think it: If he gets serious, he will be the best of the escarabajos. He goes on and wins stage 1 at Tour du Haut, wins the GC, wins the points. Yes, small European tour race in France, but we see is winning, we assume trajectory is going up for the year. Then he doesn't SHOW UP FOR THE TOUR?!?!. (a FRENCH team at Le Tour picks him for leader and he does this?! the gall!) Another fight with the team (just like Liquigas?) at Ag2r. He gets stuck with "visa" problems for the rest of the year. Red Flag Again! (is that like two here?).
2014 still: He is a head case, we hear about billiards and beer and parties. He randomly shows up to colombian races and WINS THEM (but then gets disqualified because he is WT/he didn't sign up for the race/he forgot to sign in before the race, etc..).
2015: We hear Arredondo is willing to train with him but Arredondo gets wrecked and is out for 2 years. We also heard Uran and Henao went to knock at this door for training and he wouldn't come out. We hear the issue is the team Ag2r and he refuses to race with them (just like he refused to race for Liquigas).CRAZY RED FLAGS!
2016: If anyone will fix him, it will be Movistar. He does Asturias. Not a big race, Hugh Carthy wins the overall but out of shape Betancur wins stage 2! another roller stage, not a climber one, but this is great! beginning of the year starting out well. He does Castilla y Leon and WINS STAGE 1!. He then become domestique #1 and helps his new best friend Valverde win the next stage and the overall! what we wanted! He goes to the Giro but struggles, does some breakaways, but ends up abandoning on stage 19 (you forgot he was there? LOL).
2017: Too soon to tell. He started 2016 around March/April so he is a bit ahead of schedule.
This is actually a really important race for him. Anacona is there with him. Arredondo will be there, probably side to side. Bernal (20) and Martinez (21) and even Gaviria (23) are all young colombians that will love to be racing with the great Betancur. Add Uran to the event and his teammate Carapaz from Ecuador and you have your typical training ride in Colombia at this race. Betancur is now 28 (P. Sagan is 27). This year WILL be his last option at the WT peloton (IMO). Duarte, Sarmiento, Avila, Rodriguez, Rubiano,Chalapud all make up the list of pretty good colombians that couldn't cut it at WT for many reasons and are back at continental levels. Betancur is done if he doesn't do anything in 2017
 
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
No offence, but this isn't even close.

I've never seen a compulsive obsession with anyone or anything other than Greg Lemond (and maybe Team Sky), but to say the entire Columbian and Portuguese contingent is some sort of object of obsession is hyperbole.

Cheers :)
 
Jun 30, 2014
5,465
0
0
gerundium said:
gospina said:
"wall of text"
The only thing missing from this summation was his really impressive ride in LBL that got him selected for the Giro.
That was an amazing ride, he looked stronger than Valverde, who was having a bad day (by his standarts).
 
carton said:
Angliru said:
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
The Colombian riders are pretty deserving of the attention that they get but this Portuguese phenomenon that you speak of I can't really say that I've noticed it at all. If we have many Portuguese posters on here it's only natural that they discuss their nation's riders often. Having these posters providing insights that we may not always have at our disposal otherwise is a gift IMO.
I think this is the wrong diagnosis. There are many things at play (among them, that GC riders get more play than classics' men), but one of the main issues is hype. People here love drama, they love to hype up riders as soon as they show any promise and then knock them down as soon as they show the first signs of not being able to live up to said hype. So riders like Joe Dombrowski (6 pages), Ruben Fernandez (3 pages), Egan Bernal (8 pages!) or Wilco Kelderman (35 pages!!!) get a lot more discussion without a single WorldTour win than someone like Darwin Atapuma (1 page) or Gianni Meersman (no thread :( ). Similarly, Richie Porte gets about as much discussion as Alejandro Valverde.

As I've stated, I think Betancur is a perfect storm of sorts. A rider whose strengths and early results matches our dreams, and whose present and weaknesses matches our realities.
Betancur receives more forum discussion than TJVG which kinda puts TJVG's performances in perspective !
 
movingtarget said:
carton said:
Angliru said:
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
The Colombian riders are pretty deserving of the attention that they get but this Portuguese phenomenon that you speak of I can't really say that I've noticed it at all. If we have many Portuguese posters on here it's only natural that they discuss their nation's riders often. Having these posters providing insights that we may not always have at our disposal otherwise is a gift IMO.
I think this is the wrong diagnosis. There are many things at play (among them, that GC riders get more play than classics' men), but one of the main issues is hype. People here love drama, they love to hype up riders as soon as they show any promise and then knock them down as soon as they show the first signs of not being able to live up to said hype. So riders like Joe Dombrowski (6 pages), Ruben Fernandez (3 pages), Egan Bernal (8 pages!) or Wilco Kelderman (35 pages!!!) get a lot more discussion without a single WorldTour win than someone like Darwin Atapuma (1 page) or Gianni Meersman (no thread :( ). Similarly, Richie Porte gets about as much discussion as Alejandro Valverde.

As I've stated, I think Betancur is a perfect storm of sorts. A rider whose strengths and early results matches our dreams, and whose present and weaknesses matches our realities.
Betancur receives more forum discussion than TJVG which kinda puts TJVG's performances in perspective !
Yes one quits from the front the other quits from the back :D
 
Mar 11, 2009
832
0
0
Re:

jaylew said:
Scarponi said:
The real answer as why this rider has this many pages compared to anyone else is that this forum has an compulsive obsession with Columbian and portuguese riders. At least 20 posters will comment on a rider who finishes 25th like it's an achievement because he is Colombian. It takes a Contador or Peter Sagan for these posters to even consider anyone outside of this country. It's sickening in every single thread you can read the word "Colombian" for a rider who has failed for five years while skipping the true protagonists of the race , Australian riders are especially down castes in favour of this top 25 Colombian brigade
Oh, come on. That's a complete exaggeration. You don't hear all that much about Portuguese riders (though maybe a bit more than they deserve given the level of riders) but the talk about Colombian riders has been mostly justified. We went from guys like Duque and Serpa to an age where Colombians are winning and competing to win the biggest races on the calendar. It would be similar if a bunch of Malaysians, Ugandans, or Icelanders suddenly started putting up similar results.

Let's be honest, people are fascinated with Betancur because he burst on the scene in some really big races early in his career and has been a trainwreck since. He somehow performs (at times) despite having a different build from most guys and always has drama surrounding him. It's just human nature that he gets more discussion than his results merit.
Just reading this post and the thought flashed in my head that he is this generation's Jan Ullrich. I know the results are less but the early flash, the weight jokes ...
 
Re:

jaylew said:
Oh, come on. That's a complete exaggeration. You don't hear all that much about Portuguese riders (though maybe a bit more than they deserve given the level of riders) but the talk about Colombian riders has been mostly justified. We went from guys like Duque and Serpa to an age where Colombians are winning and competing to win the biggest races on the calendar. It would be similar if a bunch of Malaysians, Ugandans, or Icelanders suddenly started putting up similar results.

Mm, dunno. Malaysia or Uganda never had Fabio Parras, Cochises, Lucho Herreras, Santiago Boteros, Soler, etc etc.

Iceland is just a small town :D
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS