AngusW said:Congratulations to Cav on receiving his MBE. I'm not sure exactly how much it meant to him because despite dressing in a suit and brushing/gel-ing his hair he couldn't be bothered having a shave. It's not like he was told at the last moment "Hey, Cav, get up, you've won an MBE, you've got 5 minutes to get your *** down to Buck House!'" "Crikey! Where's me suit? Oh ****e, no time to shave. How does me hair look?"
I've always thought that the wording of the MBE rationale "for services to the sport of <insert sport name>" was somewhat misleading. For me, the ones who actually do a real service to the sport are the unpaid, often unthanked, volunteers at club level (and higher) who spend heaps of their time (and money too, often) organising events for the athletes themselves simply for the love of the sport and a sense of community. Cav, while winning cycle races, is actually doing a service for himself, rather than the sport of cycling, by getting bonuses and increasing his market value.
I'm not knocking Cav for winning races or being awarded an MBE. It's in his job description to win bike races as often as possible and he may be performing a service to the sport in getting heaps of young people inspired enough to take up the sport of cycling. I'm just saying that perhaps it's time to change the wording of why the MBE is awarded to top sportsmen/women. Something like "...for being really, really good in the sport of <insert>"?
Cav doesn't just win bike races. He supports the Right to Play charity, supports charities and clubs on the Isle of Man plus other things that don't get a heap of press coverage.
If anyone deserves an MBE, he does.
