the complete lack of objectivity from the opposite side is amusing tooLaFlorecita said:I want whatever Taxus is smoking, please![]()
dacooley said:the complete lack of objectivity from the opposite side is amusing tooLaFlorecita said:I want whatever Taxus is smoking, please![]()
Taxus4a said:dacooley said:the complete lack of objectivity from the opposite side is amusing tooLaFlorecita said:I want whatever Taxus is smoking, please![]()
I have been very objetive. I have given arguments and I put objetives data.
The other part simply invented one story in their minds and is impossible to put it out of them. But time will give reasons.
I remerbered when in the spanish forum some people wrote after his second place at la Vuelta (moral winner): this is an strange result, this man will be as Jaskula and things like that, he will disapear. And I replied: you are wrong, froome is very good and will improve a lot, he is here to stay. That people never admited his mistake and has year by year an explanation.
I was right, in that and in a lot of things later aboput Froome, but I am the wrong or I smoke something. There are more than 16 years I dont smoke anything ilegal.
If they are happy that way, no problem... But reality in another. And truth is just one.
LaFlorecita said:I want whatever Taxus is smoking, please![]()
dacooley said:Taxus4a said:dacooley said:the complete lack of objectivity from the opposite side is amusing tooLaFlorecita said:I want whatever Taxus is smoking, please![]()
I have been very objetive. I have given arguments and I put objetives data.
The other part simply invented one story in their minds and is impossible to put it out of them. But time will give reasons.
I remerbered when in the spanish forum some people wrote after his second place at la Vuelta (moral winner): this is an strange result, this man will be as Jaskula and things like that, he will disapear. And I replied: you are wrong, froome is very good and will improve a lot, he is here to stay. That people never admited his mistake and has year by year an explanation.
I was right, in that and in a lot of things later aboput Froome, but I am the wrong or I smoke something. There are more than 16 years I dont smoke anything ilegal.
If they are happy that way, no problem... But reality in another. And truth is just one.
there is no complete objectivity in suchlike discussions as ones believe in froome and selflessly defend him and others will always remain non-believers due to numerous reasons discussed for years on here.
the thing is facts and data are interpreted very differently depending on circumstances, simpathies, antipathies. that's what makes forums so dynamic. As for admitting to be wrong yes that's the case, if people hate someone on here they rarely change their mind and mocking froome is certainly way more pleasurable that saying about what a good rider he isTaxus4a said:dacooley said:Taxus4a said:dacooley said:the complete lack of objectivity from the opposite side is amusing tooLaFlorecita said:I want whatever Taxus is smoking, please![]()
I have been very objetive. I have given arguments and I put objetives data.
The other part simply invented one story in their minds and is impossible to put it out of them. But time will give reasons.
I remerbered when in the spanish forum some people wrote after his second place at la Vuelta (moral winner): this is an strange result, this man will be as Jaskula and things like that, he will disapear. And I replied: you are wrong, froome is very good and will improve a lot, he is here to stay. That people never admited his mistake and has year by year an explanation.
I was right, in that and in a lot of things later aboput Froome, but I am the wrong or I smoke something. There are more than 16 years I dont smoke anything ilegal.
If they are happy that way, no problem... But reality in another. And truth is just one.
there is no complete objectivity in suchlike discussions as ones believe in froome and selflessly defend him and others will always remain non-believers due to numerous reasons discussed for years on here.
Fact and data are always objetive, and time is giving me reason from 2008 and 2011, and we are already in 2016. But those people who time dont give reason are the more prepotent. They looks dont be able to change his mind. Everybody can be wrong, but everybody must at least admit, maybe I am wrong. I say that: maybe I am wrong, can you say the same? I think is not ask too much when facts are in the other direction to you. Although this kind of people use to be blind.
People that were wrong about what was happening in cycling in 2000 (but people inside cycling know) now are again wrong about what is happening or about how to explain things (but people inside cycling know).
cantpedal said:samhocking said:I don't think you can justify a theory of suspicion about rider A just because it isn't smooth and gradual like rider B? I mean we know during Froomes 2007 to 2011 rapid improvement he was closing in on riders we now know were definitely cheating. Those riders like your Armstrong, Basso, Rasmussen, Schumacher, Contador, Kohl, Ricco, Beltran, Sella, Astarloa, DiLuca, Piepoli, Rebellin, Sevilla, Sinkewitz, Kolobnev, Shlecks, Valverde, Gregorio, Danielson, Scarponi, Visconti etc etc. They all have the required 'unsuspicious' gradually improving palamares and all banned?
I would say, the reason for Froomes sudden improvement in 2007 to 2011 is simply because all those riders listed above were simply not riding against Froome!
I would turn the argument around and say how did any ethical rider stay with these guys back then. that's the puzzle
dacooley said:Taxus4a said:the complete lack of objectivity from the opposite side is amusing tooLaFlorecita said:I want whatever Taxus is smoking, please![]()
I have been very objetive. I have given arguments and I put objetives data.
The other part simply invented one story in their minds and is impossible to put it out of them. But time will give reasons.
I remerbered when in the spanish forum some people wrote after his second place at la Vuelta (moral winner): this is an strange result, this man will be as Jaskula and things like that, he will disapear. And I replied: you are wrong, froome is very good and will improve a lot, he is here to stay. That people never admited his mistake and has year by year an explanation.
I was right, in that and in a lot of things later aboput Froome, but I am the wrong or I smoke something. There are more than 16 years I dont smoke anything ilegal.
If they are happy that way, no problem... But reality in another. And truth is just one.
Stingray34 said:This year's Tour isn't hard enough for Froome-dawg. This means the others have a chance to snatch the bone.
yaco said:Back to other news - Froome will re-appear in the Volta Catalunya - I imagine he will be in good nick,seeing the way he ride the Herald Sun Tour - Anyway nearly all the big guns will be at Catalunya - It may be an early season TDF.
yaco said:Back to other news - Froome will re-appear in the Volta Catalunya - I imagine he will be in good nick,seeing the way he ride the Herald Sun Tour - Anyway nearly all the big guns will be at Catalunya - It may be an early season TDF.
Taxus4a said:I think the problem for him is that he prefers longer stages, longerITT and a longer first week.
vedrafjord said:Taxus4a said:I think the problem for him is that he prefers longer stages, longerITT and a longer first week.
The route seems set up to give Quintana a chance, with multi-mountain stages throughout the race from stage 8 on, and only one of the monoclimb stages Froome likes, on stage 12. They're trying to make it harder for Froome to kill off the race on the first MTF.
Taxus4a said:Froome dont like monoclimbs, but it it depends whom you compare. Quintana in a big climber with big endurance and respect Quintana better monoclimbs stages, but respect Contador (or Porte), better multiclimbs.
vedrafjord said:Taxus4a said:Froome dont like monoclimbs, but it it depends whom you compare. Quintana in a big climber with big endurance and respect Quintana better monoclimbs stages, but respect Contador (or Porte), better multiclimbs.
His Tour wins:
2012 stage 7 (La Planche des Belles Filles)
2013 stage 8 (Ax-3-Domaines)
2013 stage 15 (Mont Ventoux)
2015 stage 10 (La Pierre Saint-Martin)
Three of those are monoclimb stages, and the other is close (75% flat, then two climbs at the end of the stage). The Vuelta stage he won had a similar profile to Ax-3-D but with smaller climbs.
He's never won a classic multi-mountain GT stage. The nearest I can think of was his win in stage 7 of last year's Dauphine ie not in a GT and against a limited field (Nibali was toast after the day before so he only had to beat Tejay).
Very good observation.vedrafjord said:Taxus4a said:Froome dont like monoclimbs, but it it depends whom you compare. Quintana in a big climber with big endurance and respect Quintana better monoclimbs stages, but respect Contador (or Porte), better multiclimbs.
His Tour wins:
2012 stage 7 (La Planche des Belles Filles)
2013 stage 8 (Ax-3-Domaines)
2013 stage 15 (Mont Ventoux)
2015 stage 10 (La Pierre Saint-Martin)
Three of those are monoclimb stages, and the other is close (75% flat, then two climbs at the end of the stage). The Vuelta stage he won had a similar profile to Ax-3-D but with smaller climbs.
He's never won a classic multi-mountain GT stage. The nearest I can think of was his win in stage 7 of last year's Dauphine ie not in a GT and against a limited field (Nibali was toast after the day before so he only had to beat Tejay).
sir fly said:Very good observation.vedrafjord said:Taxus4a said:Froome dont like monoclimbs, but it it depends whom you compare. Quintana in a big climber with big endurance and respect Quintana better monoclimbs stages, but respect Contador (or Porte), better multiclimbs.
His Tour wins:
2012 stage 7 (La Planche des Belles Filles)
2013 stage 8 (Ax-3-Domaines)
2013 stage 15 (Mont Ventoux)
2015 stage 10 (La Pierre Saint-Martin)
Three of those are monoclimb stages, and the other is close (75% flat, then two climbs at the end of the stage). The Vuelta stage he won had a similar profile to Ax-3-D but with smaller climbs.
He's never won a classic multi-mountain GT stage. The nearest I can think of was his win in stage 7 of last year's Dauphine ie not in a GT and against a limited field (Nibali was toast after the day before so he only had to beat Tejay).
The question is, is this year's Tour giving enough advantage to Froome to successfully defend what he can gain on his favourite profiles?
Maybe the time comparison could be a good indicator, or his rate of fading in the previous Tours. The stages after Ardeche time trial cumulate kilometres and kilometres of altitude.
And it's not only about Froomes resilience.
dacooley said:that's more about froome's shape in a particular stage of the race than profile of the stage, had the 1st mtf been a multimountain stage in 2013 or 2015, i'd wager he could've destroyed the field as he really did and i don't think he would've done alpe d'huez much better if that was a mont ventoux esque stage