The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
I wonder what Dave Brailsford is thinking?Lequack said:Wonder what they're both thinking:
He’s been up it beforeAmazinmets87 said:What are expectations for Froome on Mende? I'm under the impression that short, steep climbs are not his strong suit. Does he have any good performances on similar terrain?
I said short and steep. The mende seems to favor a rider with a strong kickbigcog said:Froome contrary to popular belief is good up the steep stuff like the Zoncolan and Angliru, but is the Mende in that category ? I don't think he has the stages left to get back all the time G has on him, and ITT will be close.
Amazinmets87 said:I said short and steep. The mende seems to favor a rider with a strong kickbigcog said:Froome contrary to popular belief is good up the steep stuff like the Zoncolan and Angliru, but is the Mende in that category ? I don't think he has the stages left to get back all the time G has on him, and ITT will be close.
Singer01 said:There isn't really many places to take time left. And in current form I'd have G and Froome equal in the tt. Interesting times. I bet Mrs Brad is set at home cackling maniacally right now
Merckx index said:Shaping up well for Froome:
Porte: crashed out
Uran: crashed out
Nibs: crashed out
Landa: crashed and hurting
Quintana: not nearly good enough
Who's left? His own teammate, who may have a decent time gap, but who has yet to prove he can ride at a high level for three weeks. And Dumo, who should be feeling the Giro in week three as much as Froome should. Normally the ITT would favor Dumo, certainly enough to gain the handful of seconds he trails by, but the climbs and descents take away his power advantage.
No, it's only bad luck if your favourite crashes, if it's a rival it's poor bike handling.movingtarget said:Merckx index said:Shaping up well for Froome:
Porte: crashed out
Uran: crashed out
Nibs: crashed out
Landa: crashed and hurting
Quintana: not nearly good enough
Who's left? His own teammate, who may have a decent time gap, but who has yet to prove he can ride at a high level for three weeks. And Dumo, who should be feeling the Giro in week three as much as Froome should. Normally the ITT would favor Dumo, certainly enough to gain the handful of seconds he trails by, but the climbs and descents take away his power advantage.
Carnage is part of grand tour racing so is staying on the bike but anyone who thinks luck isn't involved is naive. Sky's time for some luck but Froome's crash could have also been much nastier. It's seems to be Dumoulin or no one now as Sky's main rival. Bardet's TT put's his ambitions on a leash and his climbing so far and usually isn't enough to make a big difference.
G. is stronger, slightly but stronger and I don't see how the dynamic can be switched. DB and Sky management are not too much concerned about who will eventually win Thomas or Froome, so it doesn't make sense to change a team hirarchy unless Thomas cracks.spalco said:I'm not too concerned yet. Thomas has some time on Froome, and Dumoulin is looking strong, but Froome has a lot more experience getting on GT podiums than either of them and they can drop 2,3 (or 10) minutes on almost any of the remaining race days if something goes wrong.
He does need time before the TT, but he's still on the right track for now imo.
Well, I don't give a *** about Sky or Thomas, I just want Froome to win.dacooley said:G. is stronger, slightly but stronger and I don't see how the dynamic can be switched. DB and Sky management are not too much concerned about who will eventually win Thomas or Froome, so it doesn't make sense to change a team hirarchy unless Thomas cracks.
Certainly, what Froome could pull off in the stage 19 of the Giro will make us believe in any miracles until the bitter end. But back then he had entire team at his disposal. What Sky are going to invent now, having Thomas at driving seat, is a great question. Otoh, if Froome doesn't start attackling like crazy, people won't understand him either. So it will be fun either way.spalco said:Well, I don't give a **** about Sky or Thomas, I just want Froome to win.dacooley said:G. is stronger, slightly but stronger and I don't see how the dynamic can be switched. DB and Sky management are not too much concerned about who will eventually win Thomas or Froome, so it doesn't make sense to change a team hirarchy unless Thomas cracks.
Anyway, sure, Thomas has to get support, but not 100% support. Brailsford would be foolish to sacrifice Froome, I think he's still the better bet.
yaco said:I suspected at the time that Dauphine would be a stronger form reference than the Suisse and that's the way it appears at the moment.
movingtarget said:yaco said:I suspected at the time that Dauphine would be a stronger form reference than the Suisse and that's the way it appears at the moment.
Most of the time it is because it's draws the better GC riders and it is usually also a better route to prepare for the Tour and they always preview one or two Tour stages.
yaco said:movingtarget said:yaco said:I suspected at the time that Dauphine would be a stronger form reference than the Suisse and that's the way it appears at the moment.
Most of the time it is because it's draws the better GC riders and it is usually also a better route to prepare for the Tour and they always preview one or two Tour stages.
Absolutely - Though this year the Suisse seemed to have better GC riders.