• We're giving away a Cyclingnews water bottle! Find out more here!

Teams & Riders Chris Froome Discussion Thread.

Page 577 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I totally think fans will get sentimental and root for Froome when he comes back, however only if he isn't as strong as he used to be. You know, a lot like Contador got all the more likeable when he constantly pulled off ridiculous attacks because he couldn't win by just attacking 5 k from the finish anymore. A lot of the dislike for Froome has to do with the way he, or more precisely his team, races. If he comes back and he just isn't the strongest rider in the race anymore, he will have to change his riding style and if that happens I can absolutely see a lot of cheering for him.
That said, if there is another tour with him sitting behind the Ineos train for 21 stages, winning another tour by default because nobody properly attacks in the mountains, and he gains a minute on everyone in the TT's, then it would probably go straight back to booing. Sounds sh*tty but that's just how sports fans work.
 
Re: Re:

ClassicomanoLuigi said:
VayaVayaVaya said:
I’m confused. The story all along was that he took excessive risks in removing both hands from the steering wheel to blow his nose and that a freak gust of wind knocked him off his bike. Why are you acting like you’re debunking a conspiracy theory?
It was to correct inaccurate reporting about the incident, especially second-hand interpretations on Twitter, how he crashed on 'a technical descent', and the idea that Froome lost 2000ml of blood on the ground at the scene of the crash. Questions were unresolved for some other members in the forum. There isn't a conspiracy, and if the facts put an end to conspiracy theorists' nonsense, so much the better. Not to be indelicate or mean ...but will point out that racing bicycles have handlebars, not steering wheels. Maybe that just means 'the front wheel'
The blood loss would mostly be due to internal bleeding, so there wouldn't be blood on the ground. If a head surgeon at a major hospital tells you he lost nearly two litres, then he lost nearly two litres. His expert opinion based on actual information is not debunked by 'curiosity seekers' on a day trip.
 
Re: Re:

Parker said:
ClassicomanoLuigi said:
VayaVayaVaya said:
I’m confused. The story all along was that he took excessive risks in removing both hands from the steering wheel to blow his nose and that a freak gust of wind knocked him off his bike. Why are you acting like you’re debunking a conspiracy theory?
It was to correct inaccurate reporting about the incident, especially second-hand interpretations on Twitter, how he crashed on 'a technical descent', and the idea that Froome lost 2000ml of blood on the ground at the scene of the crash. Questions were unresolved for some other members in the forum. There isn't a conspiracy, and if the facts put an end to conspiracy theorists' nonsense, so much the better. Not to be indelicate or mean ...but will point out that racing bicycles have handlebars, not steering wheels. Maybe that just means 'the front wheel'
The blood loss would mostly be due to internal bleeding, so there wouldn't be blood on the ground. If a head surgeon at a major hospital tells you he lost nearly two litres, then he lost nearly two litres. His expert opinion based on actual information is not debunked by 'curiosity seekers' on a day trip.
:lol:
 
Re:

MatParker117 said:
https://mobile.twitter.com/inrng/status/1151590788960329739

An extremely belated congratulations to Chris on becoming the first British rider to win a Grand Tour and joining Coppi, Indurain and Contador in becoming a seven time GT winner.
I like Froome, but not much to congratulate here. It can’t feel like much of a win to him.
 
I would assume Froome will not return to something like his best. Apart from his injuries, he's getting older anyway. To answer some of the points above saying that he would not receive a hero's welcome in France: why not just target Giro-Vuelta double for a couple of seasons (I would assume that's all he's got left at the top). The 2011 Vuelta is his seventh GT. Anquetil had 8. Hinault had 10. Merckx had 11. If I were Froome, I'd rather target the most GTs of all time rather than the most Tours. But then I'm just an old chunk of coal - Froome is the diamond.
 
Re:

TMP402 said:
I would assume Froome will not return to something like his best. Apart from his injuries, he's getting older anyway. To answer some of the points above saying that he would not receive a hero's welcome in France: why not just target Giro-Vuelta double for a couple of seasons (I would assume that's all he's got left at the top). The 2011 Vuelta is his seventh GT. Anquetil had 8. Hinault had 10. Merckx had 11. If I were Froome, I'd rather target the most GTs of all time rather than the most Tours. But then I'm just an old chunk of coal - Froome is the diamond.

He's not exactly liked in Spain either. Granted they aren't as bad about showing their displeasure as the the fans at the Tour are, but they don't particularly care for him either.
 
Re: Re:

Koronin said:
TMP402 said:
I would assume Froome will not return to something like his best. Apart from his injuries, he's getting older anyway. To answer some of the points above saying that he would not receive a hero's welcome in France: why not just target Giro-Vuelta double for a couple of seasons (I would assume that's all he's got left at the top). The 2011 Vuelta is his seventh GT. Anquetil had 8. Hinault had 10. Merckx had 11. If I were Froome, I'd rather target the most GTs of all time rather than the most Tours. But then I'm just an old chunk of coal - Froome is the diamond.

He's not exactly liked in Spain either. Granted they aren't as bad about showing their displeasure as the the fans at the Tour are, but they don't particularly care for him either.
Lol....everybody love my idol please, please love him
 
Re: Re:

rick james said:
tobydawq said:
F_Cance said:
Singer01 said:
There are going to be some very salty Contador fans today.
He still won more
Not officially. In the record books it's 7-7, now.

9-6 in my book, though.
How convenient
What do you mean? I also have Lance at 7 Tours, and it's not like I particularly like him. I'm not that much against Froome, either?
 
Re: Re:

Singer01 said:
tobydawq said:
F_Cance said:
Singer01 said:
There are going to be some very salty Contador fans today.
He still won more
Not officially. In the record books it's 7-7, now.

9-6 in my book, though.
8-7 for me, which one of Froomes are you not giving him? Vuelta 1 or 2?
I count victories on the road unless a disqualification follows immediately (of course that doesn't happen when talking about Grand Tour victories) for example for irregular sprinting.

Which of Contador's are you not giving him?
 
Re: Re:

tobydawq said:
Singer01 said:
tobydawq said:
F_Cance said:
Singer01 said:
There are going to be some very salty Contador fans today.
He still won more
Not officially. In the record books it's 7-7, now.

9-6 in my book, though.
8-7 for me, which one of Froomes are you not giving him? Vuelta 1 or 2?
I count victories on the road unless a disqualification follows immediately (of course that doesn't happen when talking about Grand Tour victories) for example for irregular sprinting.

Which of Contador's are you not giving him?
2010 tour, if you actually test and are convicted of doping during a race that's coming off your record (in my opinion).
 
Re:

rick james said:
Javier d'Abernon
@vayerism
Froome is back on a bike 35 days after piercing his thigh and his skin as his femur snapped in two.

That's incredible


Please tell me your source isn’t this?
According to the Telegragh he is using a trainer with one leg as of yesterday, hardly fishy although seems a bit risky to me but what do I know.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts