Just another no talent dude who raced pro for 20 years.Who is actually listening to this mug after that *** he pulled in 13', this guy never had any actual talent on a bike.
Just another no talent dude who raced pro for 20 years.Who is actually listening to this mug after that *** he pulled in 13', this guy never had any actual talent on a bike.
20 years of fetching bottlesJust another no talent dude who raced pro for 20 years.![]()
Actually he was a very talented pro. Mostly in the US but he rode pretty well mountain domestique for Cadel Evans. And his Vuelta win was brilliant.Who is actually listening to this mug after that *** he pulled in 13', this guy never had any actual talent on a bike.
While not my favorite guy, you clearly don't know what you're talking about.Who is actually listening to this mug after that *** he pulled in 13', this guy never had any actual talent on a bike.
OK, got it, you were just putting the worm on the hook there.20 years of fetching bottles
Tremendously talented. Massive engine. Phenomenal recovery. And that was in the mid-1990s. What a treat to race side by side with him over a few years in the U.S.!Actually he was a very talented pro. Mostly in the US but he rode pretty well mountain domestique for Cadel Evans. And his Vuelta win was brilliant.
Even if that would've been what he did (it wasn't) trust me the domestiques really has to be able read the race. A GT winner is nothing without their domestiques.20 years of fetching bottles
I am sure there are a few San Diegans who read and remember.... Horner as a junior and very young man had a beat up Firebird and a 3rd hand hammered looking Guerciotti, or something old Italian steel as his first bikes.Tremendously talented. Massive engine. Phenomenal recovery. And that was in the mid-1990s. What a treat to race side by side with him over a few years in the U.S.!
Well, he has always been saying you just go out and ride as hard as you feel you can do. This means no specified intervals as such, but of course, you can go hard on a segment. The flip side of the coin, and what I also agree with, is that you do not need to do the ridiculous "zone 2" riding. For pros zone 2 is a hard ride, maybe it does not destroy you but it is still hard. Maybe 75% of FTP. And if you define zone 2 like that it makes sense. But riding at 50% of FTP (what most training tools suggest for amateurs) is completely useless and a waste of time.Its a new season and I'm ready for Coach Horner lol
Don't do intervals, nobody needs intervals! Then proceeds to prove intervals are unnecessary by having his kid average 100km per day over the past year lol
Ya who could predict big improvements from riding as many or more kms than most pros in a year
If you're talking about Horner....he beat all of Motorola riding w/o team at National Champs. He lived so deeply in Armstrong's head that Ochowicz saw to it that Horner wasn't included in the US Olympic team. Horner was a better talent than Armstrong but was pretty much frozen out of any big American team by that mafioso consortium.Who is actually listening to this mug after that *** he pulled in 13', this guy never had any actual talent on a bike.
Totally agree. The zone 2 most pros I've met topped out at 65% and they could do it all day. Add some redline intervals on other days and you have some serious metabolic efficiency being built, IMO. It's totally individual, though. Amateurs tend to get fixated with base and may be able to ride for 6 hrs. When they race and the pace goes above 40km/hr they slip off and finish the events remaining hours with their friends.Well, he has always been saying you just go out and ride as hard as you feel you can do. This means no specified intervals as such, but of course, you can go hard on a segment. The flip side of the coin, and what I also agree with, is that you do not need to do the ridiculous "zone 2" riding. For pros zone 2 is a hard ride, maybe it does not destroy you but it is still hard. Maybe 75% of FTP. And if you define zone 2 like that it makes sense. But riding at 50% of FTP (what most training tools suggest for amateurs) is completely useless and a waste of time.
Horner's take was pretty logical. UAE had a plan, Politt and Wellens pulling back a break that included a teammate was never discussed.Horners take on Vermeersch being a knucklehead in Omloop is kinda stupid. If you look at the next UAE rider who finished, its Politt. Not really known as a sprinter. The only good that not working and getting caught would have done were to possibly carry Visma, which are sort of Horners darlings, to victory. Also its not a law of nature that VDP must win against Vermeersch so taking your chances was actually the right decision. I would imagine, if Vermeersch didn't cooperate he and van Dike would have been dropped much earlier.
Also its not a law of nature that VDP must win ...
What statistical predictors would someone use to think that Van der Poel wouldn't keep winning after he did so almost effortlessly all winter.I mean not a hard law, soft law ...
