The actions you cry about the whole time is when he was 19
And he's still demonstrating the same traits today, as evidenced by the way he's moved on from a second team by age 22 because he isn't getting his own way.
He was an adult then, and regardless of how fully formed the brain is or is not, he was still old enough for people to make judgements based on his words and deeds that impact how they perceive him. Besides, you act like I am this ball of incandescent rage about Uijtdebroeks but in all honesty, he isn't very important - and certainly nothing like as important as
he seems to think he is, which is what most of the derision is derived from. I was mostly just memeing him as a money-hungry mercenary before you went ham trying to protect him from criticism and inadvertently highlighted to me just how pathetic his tantrums about Bora and Vlasov actually were. You're perceiving it like this is vitriolic hatred, when mostly it's Schadenfreude.
You don't automatically like or dislike everybody you meet, and I didn't actively dislike Uijtdebroeks until he did something that caused me to do so. You seem to be making a really big deal out of the fact some people have looked at Cian's actions and perceived them negatively, and going out of your way to tell people why they're wrong, why he's actually a totally blameless innocent who has never done anything wrong ever, and that actually they can't voice their dislike of him because it might hurt his precious fe-fes.
And much like Logic getting needled on Remco or how people would make a big deal out of my dislike of Sagan, that's probably going some way to making people view Cian more negatively than they otherwise would.