Teams & Riders Cian Uijtdebroeks - From the wetlands to the top of cycling

Page 40 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I agree that Visma handled this very poorly, but I disagree that the system is good like it works now.

The whole business model of cycling as a whole is ***. It depends way too much (almost solely) on sponsorship. Even more so now that things like this happen. You need a proper transfer system that can become a revenue generator. Together with a proper division of TV rights.
"We ain't paying what Bora is asking" is a very weird way to advocate for a system where rider transfers generate revenue
 
Of course since you managed to twist the team manager explicitly saying that Uijtdebroeks never used bullying as a reason to leave Bora into a sign that there was some truth to bullying, it's no surprise that your perception of this case is already set and that you think what was reported is the 'truth'.

There is literally no reason for Zonneveld not name any sources now, unless he genuinely believes in some kind of cycling wide culture of retribution against whistleblowers (and I am not sure those people can even be named as such if they even exist).

But I kind suspect that he won't name any names and I suspect you will twist any logic into a pretzel yet again to 'justify' any names not being named.

I also kind of doubt that any other journalist would report about the 'bullying'. Despite their being 'multiple sources' and all.
What a weird idea of journalism you have. Now that the case is over, suddenly Zonneveld should reveal his sources? Like it's some kind of game?

That you do not believe him doesn't mean he should lose his journalistic integrity. That you don't like what he says doesn't mean he should refrain from reporting on it. Not to mention that the bullying bit was just a tiny part of an hour long podcast on the case, where he offered a completely fair and balanced view of the whole saga. It's not his fault that the copy paste press ran away with the bullying story and nothing else.
 
This passive aggressive thing a lot do, where they make allusions to a situation in order to simultaneously put blame on the other party whilst trying to appear 'above it all' has to stop. Instagram-level discourse. You really end up doing neither.

He's very young of course, plenty of time to learn, but generally speaking I'd rather riders say one of two things in response to that sort of question;

1. I don't want to talk about that, I'm moving on and focusing on my new team.

2. Yeah mate I'm glad to be shot of them treacherous ****ers, here are some examples and individuals that I'd like to publicly call out.

Either dodge the question completely or go into specifics, I'm of the opinion that cycling needs a lot more of #2 of course. Hopefully he grows in confidence and starts doing unprompted hit pieces on Vlasov and Denk. That would be good.
 
Even if that would be true. That is in the end on how adults would do it.

So somebody has pull a plug on and has sent the kids to bed. And adults took over. Likely some credit goes to UCI here to. With the move of registering Cian with Bora yesterday. Kudos to that. Showing the kids on how it's done.

So, kids, watch and learn, now go to bed.
Imagine the UCI being the adults in the room! Incredible times we live in...
 
I could be wrong, but I don't expect Cian become a future GC-winner. And certainly not the Tour. Not even with ketones, and special Jumbo (now Visma) medical treatments. Or a better bikeposition in TT. He is more the Jurgen Van den Broeck type. An excellent climber, but without much explosiveness. Even a little less in time trial than Van den Broek. Both combined, I should say. A top five in a GT. Maybe once a podium.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
I could be wrong, but I don't expect Cian become a future GC-winner. And certainly not the Tour. Not even with ketones, and special Jumbo (now Visma) medical treatments. Or a better bikeposition in TT. He is more the Jurgen Van den Broeck type. An excellent climber, but without much explosiveness. Even a little less in time trial than Van den Broek. Both combined, I should say. A top five in a GT. Maybe once a podium.
Van den Broeck didn't do that stuff at the age of 20 though.
 
I could be wrong, but I don't expect Cian become a future GC-winner. And certainly not the Tour. Not even with ketones, and special Jumbo (now Visma) medical treatments. Or a better bikeposition in TT. He is more the Jurgen Van den Broeck type. An excellent climber, but without much explosiveness. Even a little less in time trial than Van den Broek. Both combined, I should say. A top five in a GT. Maybe once a podium.
I think you'll be mistaken, I can definitely see him win a GC in the future. We'll have to see what kind of progress he'll make this year, if it's like Ayuso and he's already stagnating then you might be right, but I feel there's still some decent margin for improvement in a lot of cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Van den Broeck didn't do that stuff at the age of 20 though.
Look at Ayuso. A better climber and a far better TT at 20. Already 22 next season. But no major progress, and during the Tour 24 Pogacar's domestique. Then you can be sure that Cian will become Vingegaard's domestique in the coming years..... unless winning the Giro next year (or at least be second after Pogacar).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Now that this episode behind him, he should fully concentrate on his objective. Top 10 sure, top 5 maybe, Podium is remote for this Giro. This should not clash in any way with WVA/Kooij objectives considering he has to only follow wheels of the rider ahead of him not Pogi. There is more likely hood of WVA and Kooij clashing. Too early to say he will win a GT
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan