Now they're saying Thursday. Obviously not clear cut one way or the other...Sad face. Postponed til tomorrow.
Maybe they're trying to turn it into Freeman: The Musical!
(They're actually arguing over Sutton. Freeman's QC still wants his evidence ignored, GMC now want to submit the Dan Roan interview.)
- Test-oss-terone! It really is quite silly!
- The coach, he said, he used it for his willy!
GMC appear to be submitting Freeman's reply to Roan stating "I was never bullied to give medication by Shane Sutton" when asked "Were you bullied into giving medication that you didn't think was right"? in the context of Wiggins/riders in light of Jiffybag story.
Delay, Deny, Distort, Defame, Distract, Dissumulate - this is a familiar playbook...O’Rourke said she would still be making a submission to have the remaining charges thrown out and raised the possibility of applying for a judicial review into the decision to allow Sutton’s evidence.
I don't think this will cause the case to collapse, but McDonalds didn't open in Scotland until 1987, so probably a Wimpy. I am available to give evidence if required.Receiving drugs in a McDonalds toilet in Edinburgh around time of 1986 Commonwealth Games
And here's a piccie of it.but McDonalds didn't open in Scotland until 1987,
With Freeman claiming the Testogel was for Sutton, he's key the the GMC's case. So, from the off, O'Rourke has sought to discredit Sutton using any means possible and deny him any value to the GMC. Show that he lies. Show that he's a bully. All the guff about the Mail's safe and everything else, it's all been part of the same agenda.So all this against Sutton is to try and show that Freeman is the 'innocent' man in all of this and he was pushed or whatever by Sutton?
You might be interested to know that the BBC amended their story on account of what you posted (I Tweeted the link to the BBC journalist in Manchester): they've now removed the specificity around the Edinburgh accusation. It's now just that "he received drugs in a McDonalds toilet in Edinburgh. "I am available to give evidence if required.
Peters also said "At no time did I see any evidence it was for a rider. That’s a ‘huge leap" though, so rather nulls GMC's charge anyway regardless. If the panel decide it was for Freeman, the charges are dropped anyway.With Freeman claiming the Testogel was for Sutton, he's key the the GMC's case. So, from the off, O'Rourke has sought to discredit Sutton using any means possible and deny him any value to the GMC. Show that he lies. Show that he's a bully. All the guff about the Mail's safe and everything else, it's all been part of the same agenda.
But ... bear in mind that in Peters's evidence, he said it was more likely that Freeman wanted the Tesotgel for himself, than that he was made order it by Sutton. So, GMC not down and out. Flimsy and all as there case in this regard is.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Doping kills people early on | The Clinic | 3 |
Similar threads |
---|
Doping kills people early on |