The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Robert5091 said:So at 26, Alaphillipe was the oldest of the top 5?![]()
I think is the riders not the parcours. The smaller teams and the altitude also help.hfer07 said:I must confess I initially wasn't happy about the parcours, but now that I've watched the last 2 stages - my god- I was sooo wrong!! Those guys racing there are giving everything and making it so exciting to watch. Chapeau to Julian Ala - a truly warrior within the old school French tradition! Also kudos to Sosa & Dani Martinez for the Showdown on the last climb- it was a treat to the eyes & the spectacle.
I can hardly wait for tomorrow's stage
Escarabajo said:19 DNF, 1 OTL and 1 DSQ. This stage was really hard and it took the toll on a lot of riders. This is the kind of stages that make you thing twice about putting a Letras or La Linea on the profiles. It would be a major crime on February. Not with this kind of crazy racing.
Tomorrow a different kind of climb:
![]()
I expect either Lopez, Dani Martinez or Sosa to take it. But they have been on the attack 2 days in a row. So maybe there is a chance from a rider further behind to take it as well. It could turn out to be very tactical like what happened in San Juan.
In the first race of the season?70kmph said:In the olden days mighty Froome would attack this stage to salvage his reputation
Other than 2012 he has come out of the gate hot in his peak years though - 2013 and 2014 at Oman, winning stages in both, winning the Ruta del Sol in an exciting H2H with Contador in 2015 (one of the best races Froome's been involved in, imho), and in 2016 he won his first race as well, but that was the Herald Sun Tour and the field was weak in comparison to those editions of Oman and Andalucía. It's only since 2017 that he's had to focus his building to form, because in those days the weaker form Froome was still competitive. 2012 was the year he apparently re-caught schistosomiasis which explained why after his amazing end to 2011 he could barely finish a race until the Dauphiné.rick james said:In the first race of the season?70kmph said:In the olden days mighty Froome would attack this stage to salvage his reputation
70kmph said:Froome can win multiple GTs in a row but he can't get up a small hill now
His true peak was 2013, from 11-12 to 14-now he has had a very high level with some variances obviously, but not a worldbeater like he was in 2013.sir fly said:We'll see how will Froome look today, but assessing his capacities on performance so far isn't exactly the most reliable.
He's there to make some sort of base and examine altitude effects considering the complexity of this year's Tour. Also, he doesn't have to make any statements early and throughout the season any more, or get used to leader's role as it's been the case at the beginning of his GT reign.
His career peak probably was a year, year and a half ago, when he targeted doubles and rode 4 GTs in a row, so his approach these days is reasonably less weighted by the result requirements, paying attention to possible burnout.
Following Colombians on their home soil at this time of the year is more difficult than matching GT rivals later in the season.
Off to the broadcast, now.