i disagree with most of you, i'm afraid. I read ac comments as being mostly about being tactful and neutral, and not throwing armstrong under the bus. This is not the same as supporting what la did, an expression of omerta, etc. Sure, he was wrong about the "no new tests" bit, but the 2009-10 blood results have been underplayed in the english media, and likely so elsewhere, and i don't know why anyone would expect ac to read the entire (english) reasoned-decision. Besides, technically speaking it was not a new "failed test", so he is not even that wrong.
That issue aside, what else did he say that was not true, incorrect, or supportive of a doping culture? To me he seemed to be expressing mostly sympathy for a fellow cyclist who certainly has been "lynched" in that most of his former supporters who also certainly knew la was guilty have turned on la just to protect their own interests. He might simply being showing some empathy since he too recently suffered terribly because of a doping scandal. Not everything is a cover-up or a doping scandal, and not everything is about the cycling business. Sometimes it's just a man watching a fallen peer and thinking "there but for the grace of god go i".
Showing sympathy for a guilty person's suffering is not the same as condoning what that person did.