How many times do I have to repeat myself on this issue, yes Lance is very important for the lesser cycling nations but if people actually followed cycling in Europe year round, they would know the limit of Lances powers. Cycling is the national sport of Belgium and has been for forever, Lance has had nothing to do with that.
The Tour de France has been the biggest annual sporting event in the world since forever...it does not need Lance to survive and never has. How the hell have other events like the Giro or Vuelta survived all this time without Lance, because cycling in those countries has always been among the top 3-4 sports there and does not need Lance. Cycling in Germany rose and fell with Ullrich and the doping problems. The former Soviet states, why are Astana willing to continue with Vino but not Lance, surely not if Lance is so important. Increased coverage of the Tour in UK this year, mainly due to Cavendish/Wiggins. Greg LeMond had more of an impact in increasing cycling salaries and bike modifications than Lance.
Yes, Lance really brought the sport to the US and that is why he seems so necessary but believe me, he is not that necessary in Europe, national heroes are more important.