Contador on Eurosport

Page 9 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Caruut said:
I think the problem is not how much they like Alberto, but your definition of like. For most people, the idea if liking someone does not go hand in hand with believing that they can do no wrong. You seem to think that one must either "like" someone, and therefore everything they do, or else they are a "hater". The world isn't like this.

People that criticise everything he does are who I call haters. To avoid being called a hater by me, one has to like at least something about Alberto.
 
LaFlorecita said:
That's not what it is about. Airstream says riders should be honest to their fans, so I ask him do you think Andy is clean.
You didn't word it as an actual question though. It wasn't "Do you believe..." but "lol, you believe...", which implies you find it ridiculous that he could believe Andy is clean.
 
Caruut said:
Greg LeMond and Laurent Fignon could barely keep up with the pack once EPO had hit the scene. Just because a rider shows signs of being one who would thrive in a non-doping environment does not mean they aren't doping.

At school, we had two kinds of maths exams - those with and those without calculators. Some students are very good at working out difficult problems without calculators - they have a natural appreciation of how numbers behave and are able to apply it to the problems. Unsurprisingly, students who can think like this do best in the exams without calculators. However, just because they are very able without a calculator does not mean that doing 1657x2482 is easier without a calculator. Even the student who is best at the non-calculator exam still uses a calculator in the other one.

Okay... so what do you mean? That one can be good but will still dope?
 
doolols said:
Yup. I've been trying to say this many, many times, but she doesn't listen. She's branded me a hater, because I think someone who is caught with evidence of rule breaking (note the careful wording) should be punished.

The dopers ... ahem, the people who show evidence of breaking the rules ... fall into two categories: those who say "it's a fair cop, yes, I did it" (like Ullrich), and those who continue to plead their innocence when actual and circumstantial evidence indicates that they're guilty (AC, LA, et al). You have to have a grudging respect for those who accept that they were caught cheating, and take their punishment.

Look, for me a person is a hater when they like nothing a rider does.
They don't like to see him win, because he's a cheat.
They don't like to see him race, because he didn't admit he doped while just trying to save his image.
They'd much rather see him locked up, like UK's hero Brad Wiggins so kindly suggested.

Really, if Alberto had admitted doping people would hate him even more. Don't act as if he would be some sort of hero if he had admitted.
 
gooner said:
People in general only criticise him from a doping perspective. Everyone knows he is a great rider.

Yeah right. :rolleyes: "People in general" argue that all that greatness is mostly doping. You can't say that you don't like that he's doping but that you do like him a bit because he's a great rider.
 
Nilsson said:
Okay, I can agree with that. Although the image of cycling is a very complex issue.

(The image of) cycling is managed incredibly unprofessional, by opportunistic and weak authorities and individuals. There is no sport that damages itself so badly as cycling does, time after time, that hunts down its own heroes or let (in the idle hope of transparency and a better image, but accomplishing the exact opposite). There is no sport I can think of that handles its image that poorly, where individuals speak out if they like to about the 'dark sides' of the sport, gossip is out in the open and authorities are (willingly or not) cooperative to actually catch dopers, make stories and damage the sport they should manage and protect...

I, therefore, can very well understand your view on things, and why you find it hard to justify treating those who got caught any worse (beyond them rightly serving their ban) than those who haven't tested positive. I'd probably even bring that up a notch by thinking that getting caught (especially being a star) and make a big deal about it is very much cycling, and therefore it's indeed hard to justify treating those who get caught worse than those who haven't...

Tell that to football (or soccer, however it is called).

It's all hypocrisy and business, that's all. Pro sport is big business, nothing else.
 
hrotha said:
You didn't word it as an actual question though. It wasn't "Do you believe..." but "lol, you believe...", which implies you find it ridiculous that he could believe Andy is clean.

If he believes Alberto is doping he should believe that Andy does so too. My rule (and you're not going to like it):

If Alberto dopes everyone dopes. :D
 
gooner said:
I never said I liked him as a rider. I said I respected his quality and ability as a rider. You can`t dismiss that. I just don`t like him with regards to doping.

But as I said, how many of that quality and ability is the result of doping? Just trying to think like someone who "criticises him for doping".

Even if he was`nt doping, he is not exactly going to end up in the grupetto on a mountain stage is he?

Who knows?
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
LaFlorecita said:
That's not what it is about. Airstream says riders should be honest to their fans, so I ask him do you think Andy is clean.

I said many times: a rider is clean untill he is caught. Naturally I think Andy rides honestly.
So you're not a true fan then.
Well, okay, however I'm a true fan of cycling.
 
Apr 1, 2009
330
0
0
LaFlorecita said:
Lol, you believe Andy is clean?

haha how cheeky can you be? You cant even accept the possibility that Contador doped, despite the fact he was caught (irrespective of whether or not the amount was meaningful) and yet you are happy to cast doubt on other riders!

Dont you see that your love them or hate them attitude just mweans nothing you say can be taken seriously because it is all wrapped in so much bias.

Just because u like one doesnt mean you have to hate the others.
 
Apr 1, 2009
330
0
0
LaFlorecita said:
People that criticise everything he does are who I call haters. To avoid being called a hater by me, one has to like at least something about Alberto.

BS. Not liking someone doesnt mean hate, find a dictionary and look up the word; indifference
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
And yet I very like an approach according to which an attitude towards riders is based on the fact how Contador handles them. lol, never seen anything like that. :) Something tells me this list includes only Samuel Sanchez and Jesus and will never be replenished.
 
FignonLeGrand said:
haha how cheeky can you be? You cant even accept the possibility that Contador doped, despite the fact he was caught (irrespective of whether or not the amount was meaningful) and yet you are happy to cast doubt on other riders!

Dont you see that your love them or hate them attitude just mweans nothing you say can be taken seriously because it is all wrapped in so much bias.

Just because u like one doesnt mean you have to hate the others.

Lolololololol!

LaFlorecita said:
You know what it is? Some people actually care more about exciting racing than about doping. Call it a bad attitude and all that, but that's just how it is.

Why would I criticise Alberto? Seriously, I would be slightly disappointed when it comes out that he doped but whatever, I know that it's a possibility. It wouldn't change anything for me.
 
virandociclista said:
Possibly new co-sponsor for team saxo bank will join the team in 2013 only if Alberto Contador will sign with Saxo-bank after the suspension.

Nobody cares about this (his suspension). They only want to be with the best rider in the world!

Great Alberto! We are waiting the return of the king!! :)

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/new-co-sponsor-for-saxo-bank

Not that surprising, Anfi have been supporting Alberto even though he's banned.
 
FignonLeGrand said:
BS. Not liking someone doesnt mean hate, find a dictionary and look up the word; indifference

I'm sorry, but if someone dislikes everything a certain rider does or is, I call them a hater. Maybe my few is a little simplistic. For me you either love someone, hate someone, or you're neutral.
 
airstream said:
And yet I very like an approach according to which an attitude towards riders is based on the fact how Contador handles them. lol, never seen anything like that. :) Something tells me this list includes only Samuel Sanchez and Jesus and will never be replenished.

Bull****. I love lots of riders. Unfortunately, I also have to hate quite a few.
 

airstream

BANNED
Mar 29, 2011
5,122
0
0
LaFlorecita, maybe it's time to grow up and stop acting like you are right while we are all allegedly wrong? in this case "lolololol!" is almost offensive cue, I think.