bobs *** said:As far as I am concerned, this is just a reminder that the playoffs are starting in baseball and the football season is in full swing. I can't be bothered by a sport as dirty as cycling.
please tell me that's a joke
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
bobs *** said:As far as I am concerned, this is just a reminder that the playoffs are starting in baseball and the football season is in full swing. I can't be bothered by a sport as dirty as cycling.
nicholaaaas said:please tell me that's a joke
Tubeless said:Anyone considered why Contador's explanation is that he ate Spanish mean? It's not because Spanish meat is necessarily more likely to be contaminated with clenbuterol than French meat - but it would have weakened his argument against why no one else during the entire Tour de France was found to have the drug in their body. Just about all other cyclists ate French cuisine - only Contador and his un-tested teammates ate Spanish meat. Of course Vino, the only teammate tested that day skipped both lunch and dinner when the meat was served.
How convenient.
bobs *** said:http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?p=353293#post353293
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?p=353359#post353359
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?p=353293#post353293
I hope these are the right links if they aren't go to pages 115 or 117. Sorry if they aren't correct. I answered the question you just asked 3 times.
I'm not criticizing. I do the same myself (shoot first and pretend to read the thread later). If people like us didn't do that, threads wouldn't go on for days and days about nothing in particular.
thehog said:"I haven't spoken to him (Armstrong) but I know what he thinks about it through other people," he said.
"I really think people across Europe trust me. It’s a totally unjust situation. I’m a completely transparent person, dedicated to the struggle against doping and the call for anti-doping *sanctions against teams.
"I'm defending my position so ferociously because I'm speaking the truth, the whole truth.
"I don't want to think that people in France, Germany or on the Tour de France have something against me. I don't want to think that there is something else involved."
moi123 said:Very interesting interview, especially the armstrong part. But he's right, most people believe him or atleast give him the benefit of the doubt because of the extreme low percentage. I tend to believe he's the victim of a war between WADA and the UCI or anything else involved...
scribe said:It's almost like the mentioning of lance-poo's name takes some of the pressure off AC.
Tubeless said:Anyone considered why Contador's explanation is that he ate Spanish mean? It's not because Spanish meat is necessarily more likely to be contaminated with clenbuterol than French meat - but it would have weakened his argument against why no one else during the entire Tour de France was found to have the drug in their body. Just about all other cyclists ate French cuisine - only Contador and his un-tested teammates ate Spanish meat. Of course Vino, the only teammate tested that day skipped both lunch and dinner when the meat was served.
How convenient.
Anyone considered why Contador's explanation is that he ate Spanish mean? It's not because Spanish meat is necessarily more likely to be contaminated with clenbuterol than French meat - but it would have weakened his argument against why no one else during the entire Tour de France was found to have the drug in their body. Just about all other cyclists ate French cuisine - only Contador and his un-tested teammates ate Spanish meat. Of course Vino, the only teammate tested that day skipped both lunch and dinner when the meat was served.
How convenient.
khardung la said:It is not about the meat being Spanish or not, it is about having an alibi of a friend visiting him that very precise day. It is about having an exceptional reason for not having a normal meal that day
Wait, you are confusing me.khardung la said:It is not about the meat being Spanish or not, it is about having an alibi of a friend visiting him that very precise day.
Merckx index said:If the whole meat story were a fabrication, he should have said liver, because CB concentrations in liver of doped livestock are much higher than in muscle. In fact, past incidents of CB poisoning have usually occurred from eating beef liver, not steak. And while the evidence I have seen supports the possibility of 50 pg/ml from eating contaminated steak, some scientists are arguing that even that level is unlikely unless liver is ingested.
Bert had a month to make up a good story if he wanted to, and get all the players to say the right thing, but if that's what he did, he flopped badly.
Merckx index said:If the whole meat story were a fabrication, he should have said liver, because CB concentrations in liver of doped livestock are much higher than in muscle. In fact, past incidents of CB poisoning have usually occurred from eating beef liver, not steak. And while the evidence I have seen supports the possibility of 50 pg/ml from eating contaminated steak, some scientists are arguing that even that level is unlikely unless liver is ingested.
Bert had a month to make up a good story if he wanted to, and get all the players to say the right thing, but if that's what he did, he flopped badly.
I wouldn't go looking for physician's advice from a cyclist turned pill runner.thehog said:"There's no justifiable benefit to be derived from clenbuterol that is worth the risk testing positive for it," says Joe Papp.
"It produces terrible muscle cramps and tremors that would leave you considering suicide if taken during the Tour. I would know: I've tried it and I had to abandon the race. There's nothing redeeming about it even in the off season.
"Doping with clenbuterol is the equivalent of crushing and snorting Adderal as an alternative to cocaine - you're not going to get much of a hit. So why bother? If he did, what an idiot."
thehog said:"There's no justifiable benefit to be derived from clenbuterol that is worth the risk testing positive for it," says Joe Papp.
"It produces terrible muscle cramps and tremors that would leave you considering suicide if taken during the Tour. I would know: I've tried it and I had to abandon the race. There's nothing redeeming about it even in the off season.
"Doping with clenbuterol is the equivalent of crushing and snorting Adderal as an alternative to cocaine - you're not going to get much of a hit. So why bother? If he did, what an idiot."
thehog said:"There's no justifiable benefit to be derived from clenbuterol that is worth the risk testing positive for it," says Joe Papp.
"It produces terrible muscle cramps and tremors that would leave you considering suicide if taken during the Tour. I would know: I've tried it and I had to abandon the race. There's nothing redeeming about it even in the off season.
"Doping with clenbuterol is the equivalent of crushing and snorting Adderal as an alternative to cocaine - you're not going to get much of a hit. So why bother? If he did, what an idiot."
Cal_Joe said:As usual, Joe Lindsey's Boulder Report has an excellent summary of the situation...
http://bicycling.com/blogs/boulderreport/
peloton said:In a 2009 scholarly paper co-authored by Prof. Wilhelm Schaenzer, the Cologne lab director, he and two other German experts concluded: "With a detectability of clenbuterol at this low concentration, positive findings in residue analysis and doping control could be due to the consumption of trace amounts found in [livestock] feed or principally also in the water supply. Threshold concentration amounts for clenbuterol in doping control have, therefore, to be considered in the future." Catlin agreed, saying he thinks the rules are too strict.
http://sports.espn.go.com/oly/cyclin...e_d&id=5634190
nicholaaaas said:not really... first he chastises people for arm-chair qb'ing the situation. then rhetorically asks a series of questions
Cal_Joe said:Doh.
Not rhetorical - look up the definition. As far as chastising people for coming up with totally unfounded speculations and theories, remember there is a difference between The Clinic and the real world.
Der_Gestreifte said:Wait, you are confusing me.
Are you telling us the blood bags were brought by this Castilla y Leon guy?