The New Postal vs Postal Classic? Perhaps it's too close to call so I say Froome wins on personality.
Easilymyrideissteelerthanyours said:The New Postal vs Postal Classic? Perhaps it's too close to call so I say Froome wins on personality.
Red Rick said:Cycling talent is purely physiological, and thus hard to define.
contador_attacks said:dacooley said:the only thing you are bringing with that kind of statement is froome being brilliant and astonishingly talented athlete.contador_attacks said:The winner of this year's Tour has to born again to have just 1/10 of Contador's talent. 1/10. It's that simple. Case closed.
Contador is a rare talent. Riders like him, Boonen, Hushovd, Freire, Cavendish, Petacchi, Cancellara, Devolder, Gilbert, Pozzato, Ballan, Valverde, Cunego, Andy Schleck, Basso, Menchov, di Luca, Sami or Purito define a generation.
Red Rick said:Andy Schleck is younger than Froome. His time wouldn't have been over after 2011. The 2012 route was a confirmed joke, but I'm not sure that Quintana is a better rider than Schleck.
A healthy Schleck would've made every single one of the last 6 Tours a lot better, that's for sure.
Physical and mental heatlh. I think that's quite obvious. Schleck does have the clinic thread if you want to beat dead horses.arvc40 said:Red Rick said:Andy Schleck is younger than Froome. His time wouldn't have been over after 2011. The 2012 route was a confirmed joke, but I'm not sure that Quintana is a better rider than Schleck.
A healthy Schleck would've made every single one of the last 6 Tours a lot better, that's for sure.
What does healthy mean ?, If he could have carried on with same prep for races.
So not that rare then.contador_attacks said:contador_attacks said:dacooley said:the only thing you are bringing with that kind of statement is froome being brilliant and astonishingly talented athlete.contador_attacks said:The winner of this year's Tour has to born again to have just 1/10 of Contador's talent. 1/10. It's that simple. Case closed.
Contador is a rare talent. Riders like him, Boonen, Hushovd, Freire, Cavendish, Petacchi, Cancellara, Devolder, Gilbert, Pozzato, Ballan, Valverde, Cunego, Andy Schleck, Basso, Menchov, di Luca, Sami or Purito define a generation.
Just for the record... Bettini, Van Avermaet, McEwen, Bennati, Greipel, Evans, Sastre and many others are also on this list...
DFA123 said:So not that rare then.contador_attacks said:contador_attacks said:dacooley said:the only thing you are bringing with that kind of statement is froome being brilliant and astonishingly talented athlete.contador_attacks said:The winner of this year's Tour has to born again to have just 1/10 of Contador's talent. 1/10. It's that simple. Case closed.
Contador is a rare talent. Riders like him, Boonen, Hushovd, Freire, Cavendish, Petacchi, Cancellara, Devolder, Gilbert, Pozzato, Ballan, Valverde, Cunego, Andy Schleck, Basso, Menchov, di Luca, Sami or Purito define a generation.
Just for the record... Bettini, Van Avermaet, McEwen, Bennati, Greipel, Evans, Sastre and many others are also on this list...
Or Raul Alarcónbuchanan said:Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.
Lol....that rare cycling is full of them.....yet froome isn't rareDFA123 said:So not that rare then.contador_attacks said:contador_attacks said:dacooley said:the only thing you are bringing with that kind of statement is froome being brilliant and astonishingly talented athlete.contador_attacks said:The winner of this year's Tour has to born again to have just 1/10 of Contador's talent. 1/10. It's that simple. Case closed.
Contador is a rare talent. Riders like him, Boonen, Hushovd, Freire, Cavendish, Petacchi, Cancellara, Devolder, Gilbert, Pozzato, Ballan, Valverde, Cunego, Andy Schleck, Basso, Menchov, di Luca, Sami or Purito define a generation.
Just for the record... Bettini, Van Avermaet, McEwen, Bennati, Greipel, Evans, Sastre and many others are also on this list...
To me it is interesting that some self-proclaimed Contador "supporters" do nothing but talk down Contador and drool all over Froome. The poster above isn't the only one. Are you lot masochistic or is it just an act?buchanan said:Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.
Força Amaro!DFA123 said:Or Raul Alarcónbuchanan said:Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.![]()
buchanan said:Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.
contador_attacks said:buchanan said:Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion.
Froome, in my opinion, isn't in that category. I'll leave it at that.
The unique talent of the riders mentioned by me earlier is undisputable. I'm talking about real riders.
contador_attacks said:contador_attacks said:dacooley said:the only thing you are bringing with that kind of statement is froome being brilliant and astonishingly talented athlete.contador_attacks said:The winner of this year's Tour has to born again to have just 1/10 of Contador's talent. 1/10. It's that simple. Case closed.
Contador is a rare talent. Riders like him, Boonen, Hushovd, Freire, Cavendish, Petacchi, Cancellara, Devolder, Gilbert, Pozzato, Ballan, Valverde, Cunego, Andy Schleck, Basso, Menchov, di Luca, Sami or Purito define a generation.
Just for the record... Bettini, Van Avermaet, McEwen, Bennati, Greipel, Evans, Sastre and many others are also on this list...
on top of that, it is being done markedly purposefully. So to speak 'Yes, Froome won some Tours somehow, I have nothing to do but accept it. Still in terms of talent he's nowhere compared to best of the best in our sport'.buchanan said:Haha I was thinking the same thing :lol:
He goes on to name about 30 other 'rare' talents, just like Contador!
Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.
dacooley said:on top of that, it is being done markedly purposefully. So to speak 'Yes, Froome won some Tours somehow, I have nothing to do but accept it. Still in terms of talent he's nowhere compared to best of the best in our sport'.buchanan said:Haha I was thinking the same thing :lol:
He goes on to name about 30 other 'rare' talents, just like Contador!
Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.. Quasi, one's talent is what I want to see and impressive palmares does not nesessarily evidence a rare talent.
![]()
It's probably because when riders like Bennati, Ballan, McEwen, Schleck, Menchov and Pozzato were winning at the highest level, Froome was holding onto motorbikes, crashing into commissaires and getting dropped by Simon Gerrans...buchanan said:dacooley said:on top of that, it is being done markedly purposefully. So to speak 'Yes, Froome won some Tours somehow, I have nothing to do but accept it. Still in terms of talent he's nowhere compared to best of the best in our sport'.buchanan said:Haha I was thinking the same thing :lol:
He goes on to name about 30 other 'rare' talents, just like Contador!
Interestingly he doesn't mention the rarest talent of all the rare talents - 4 times Tour de France winner Chris Froome.. Quasi, one's talent is what I want to see and impressive palmares does not nesessarily evidence a rare talent.
![]()
It's so amusing :lol: Yet so obvious that the poster is deliberately not acknowledging Froome and his many dominant Tour wins (as if they are nothing), because of an intense personal dislike of Froome.
Riders like Bennati, Bettini, Ballan, Pozzato and 30 or so others he named are all 'rare' talents who 'define a generation'. But serial Tour de France winner Chris Froome is nowhere. Because logic.
Red Rick said:Pidgeons. Chess. why?