Contador

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Aug 1, 2009
1,038
0
0
Dutchsmurf said:
I keep wondering what they were talking about in that picture.

We shall soon find out - I have posted the picture in the "caption this" thread.
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
Dazed and Confused said:
FreeWheelin said:
I will speak for Cobblestoned; he said that Contador is still learning the classics.......
Would have preferred the cobbler, but ok..

At this point, I don't think Contador gives 5c for anything else than GT's. He doesn't train for it, doesn't seems to care and appears to be happy when somebody from his team wins a 1 day race. I wouldn't call this trying to learn the ropes.

If he start getting serious about these races, we can evaluate.

Here the cobbler is back.
And he observed that your choice of nickname doesn't come from nothing.
It makes perfect sense.

Anyway, I will pass you a stuffed Sunday bong.

thank you, freewheeler. You can even read.
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
LaFlorecita said:
Incredibly manly. Just because he is a nice guy doesn't mean he isn't manly.

A real man would never use a waterpistol. Especially not in front of millions of people.
We could talk about a supersoaker.....but waterpistol is a no go.
Anyway, was surprised when I met Alberto first time. He is relatively big and edgy.
But ok, nothing is like it seems on TV.

The biggest shock was to see the tennis elite in reality, watch the crazy motoGP guys and bikes, and to hear F1 motors for the first time.
 
Cobblestoned said:
A real man would never use a waterpistol. Especially not in front of millions of people.
We could talk about a supersoaker.....but waterpistol is a no go.
Anyway, was surprised when I met Alberto first time. He is relatively big and edgy.
But ok, nothing is like it seems on TV.

The biggest shock was to see the tennis elite in reality, watch the crazy motoGP guys and bikes, and to hear F1 motors for the first time.

Tss... That was just cute. And even manly men can be all kinds of cute and adorable.
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
LaFlorecita said:
Tss... That was just cute. And even manly men can be all kinds of cute and adorable.

It's one of the biggest fails possible when men do something that girls or women consider as "cute".
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,169
0
0
Cobblestoned said:
It's one of the biggest fails possible when men do something that girls or women consider as "cute".

That sure makes sense... "Damn, she thinks what I am doing is cute and is therefore happy that I am doing it, must never do that again!"
 
Aug 1, 2009
1,038
0
0
Cobblestoned said:
A real man would never use a waterpistol. Especially not in front of millions of people.

He does the pistol-shot gesture as a message to his girlfriend (now his wife - congratulations). He doesn't care what other people think. He is too self assured to be the slave of other peoples' opinion. That is extremely masculine to me.
 
HL2037 said:
He does the pistol-shot gesture as a message to his girlfriend (now his wife - congratulations). He doesn't care what other people think. He is too self assured to be the slave of other peoples' opinion. That is extremely masculine to me.

He wss only joking you know;)
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
HL2037 said:
He does the pistol-shot gesture as a message to his girlfriend (now his wife - congratulations). He doesn't care what other people think. He is too self assured to be the slave of other peoples' opinion. That is extremely masculine to me.

Man, or whatever, yesterday must have really hit you hard. So much...uh.

What part of "waterpistol" do you not understand ?
I was talking about him insulting the complete race of real men, when he was fiddling with that WATERPISTOL on his personal tour d'honneur.
I think it was even pink.
And furthermore, I always thought that he would actually execute that really cool pistolero finishing move for his handicapped brother or something like that ?!

You know what is extremely masculine really ?
It's when you do not care what women say, even when you know they are always right.
 
Aug 1, 2009
1,038
0
0
Cobblestoned said:
Man, or whatever, yesterday must have really hit you hard. So much...uh.

What part of "waterpistol" do you not understand ?
I was talking about him insulting the complete race of real men, when he was fiddling with that WATERPISTOL on his personal tour d'honneur.
I think it was even pink.
And furthermore, I always thought that he would actually execute that really cool pistolero finishing move for his handicapped brother or something like that ?!

You know what is extremely masculine really ?
It's when you do not care what women say, even when you know they are always right.

Ah, I guessed I missed a reference then. Sorry about that. I still do think that Contador is very masculine though :p
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
Sciocco said:
That sure makes sense... "Damn, she thinks what I am doing is cute and is therefore happy that I am doing it, must never do that again!"

Have you ever seen those crushed souls in florists ?
They needed several attemps to enter and suffer a lot.
It's only allowed under special circumstances. To make the women happy.
To make the women happy ?
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Be careful, dear women.

Real men have to have a different approach. A practical one.
They only buy flowers when they serve the man himself as a result.
Buying flowers and "cute" things are only allowed when:

- man wants something later (happy women sometimes tend to say "yes")
- man did something wrong (not really), wants woman to be happy again, just to make himself happy and stressfree again

Most women are of course aware of those logics and tactics. Sooner or later, after hope has died that this wasn't a practical, tactical move.
But they don't care about that, play the game, because they only want the flowers anyway, not a cute man.
Whatever you do, and that is proven by American scientists (tm), deep inside, intentionally or not, all humans are just huge egoists.
 
Jan 24, 2012
1,169
0
0
Cobblestoned said:
Have you ever seen those crushed souls in florists ?
They needed several attemps to enter and suffer a lot.
It's only allowed under special circumstances. To make the women happy.
To make the women happy ?
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Be careful, dear women.


Real men have to have a different approach. A practical one.
They only buy flowers when they serve the man himself as a result.
Buying flowers and "cute" things are only allowed when:

- man wants something later (happy women sometimes tend to say "yes")
- man did something wrong (not really), wants woman to be happy again, just to make himself happy and stressfree again

Most women are of course aware of those logics and tactics. Sooner or later, after hope has died that this wasn't a practical, tactical move.
But they don't care about that, play the game, because they only want the flowers anyway, not a cute man.
Whatever you do, and that is proven by American scientists (tm), deep inside, intentionally or not, all humans are just huge egoists.

Not sure what you said (red text).

I only agree with the rest of your post if buying flowers for a woman just to see the smile on her face counts. If not, I disagree.

I agree that humans are egoists.
 
Cobblestoned said:
Have you ever seen those crushed souls in florists ?
They needed several attemps to enter and suffer a lot.
It's only allowed under special circumstances. To make the women happy.
To make the women happy ?
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Be careful, dear women.

Real men have to have a different approach. A practical one.
They only buy flowers when they serve the man himself as a result.
Buying flowers and "cute" things are only allowed when:

- man wants something later (happy women sometimes tend to say "yes")
- man did something wrong (not really), wants woman to be happy again, just to make himself happy and stressfree again

Most women are of course aware of those logics and tactics. Sooner or later, after hope has died that this wasn't a practical, tactical move.
But they don't care about that, play the game, because they only want the flowers anyway, not a cute man.
Whatever you do, and that is proven by American scientists (tm), deep inside, intentionally or not, all humans are just huge egoists.

Still just a theory.
 
Cobblestoned said:
Have you ever seen those crushed souls in florists ?
They needed several attemps to enter and suffer a lot.
It's only allowed under special circumstances. To make the women happy.
To make the women happy ?
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
Be careful, dear women.

Real men have to have a different approach. A practical one.
They only buy flowers when they serve the man himself as a result.
Buying flowers and "cute" things are only allowed when:

- man wants something later (happy women sometimes tend to say "yes")
- man did something wrong (not really), wants woman to be happy again, just to make himself happy and stressfree again

Most women are of course aware of those logics and tactics. Sooner or later, after hope has died that this wasn't a practical, tactical move.
But they don't care about that, play the game, because they only want the flowers anyway, not a cute man.
Whatever you do, and that is proven by American scientists (tm), deep inside, intentionally or not, all humans are just huge egoists.

So what you are saying is that whatever I do or not do I can get away with it by buying her flowers :) I like this fantasy world of yours;) I know I know I've missed your whole point, bad me:rolleyes:
 
Mar 8, 2010
3,263
1
0
ferryman said:
So what you are saying is that whatever I do or not do I can get away with it by buying her flowers :) I like this fantasy world of yours;) I know I know I've missed your whole point, bad me:rolleyes:

No, flowers won't work for everything.
If you need the free-for-all card and did really bad things, you may need to invest some more and bring up bigger artillery, which would mean jewelry.
For the really nasty things.
It's a calculation thing, you know.

For example, if the benefit and pleasure from peeing while standing exceeds the cost of a diamond, then you could have a go and both are happy at the end.
 
Sep 7, 2010
770
0
0
webvan said:
Wow, that's good news after the scandalous dropping of the charges agains Armstrong, I hope he can't appeal that decision, now.

That's exactly why it's not good news.
 
Sep 18, 2010
375
0
0
Why does a 2 year ban only take him to August 2012?

Don't they tack on all the time he was riding while he was appealing?
 

Latest posts