Kirkland, Washington too. There is already talk about limiting nursing home visitation in the wake of this. Probably a mitigation step that is necessary, but I don't know if that is sufficient. Workers still come and go. I also echo what you posted earlier. All of these things feel so reactionary and random. After SARs, swine flu, Ebola, Zika.... where is the institutional preparedness. I would look to S. Korea and do what they have done. They seemed to have bent the curve in recent days.This is very interesting:
A sampling study in a Dutch hospital, where 301 employees were tested - none of which had travelled to a risk zone, and none of which had contact (as far as they knew) with a corona patient - revealed that 28 were infected with covid-19. They tested any employee with cold-like symptoms.
This to me indicates that the infection is widespread, probably all over Europe. It also indicates that the mortality numbers are (much) lower than would seem. The danger - and I guess this happened in Italy - happens when the 'wave' reaches the old and weak, then you end up with a lot of people in hospital, they get overwhelmed, and then the situation is out of control. Slow down spreading of the disease is essential - destroying it (like the Chinese told the public they would) is simply not possible anymore. Therefore, measures should probably focus especially on protecting the old and weak. The others could probably help by working as much as possible from home and generally avoiding 'stupid' behaviour (stop shaking hands etc.). But not that much more - we have to accept that it is there.
View: https://twitter.com/ByMikeBaker/status/1237422616950046720
Last edited: