The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
View: https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1245396870312198144False-negative test results — tests that indicate you are not infected, when you are — seem to be uncomfortably common. Increasingly, and disturbingly, I hear a growing number of anecdotal stories from my fellow doctors of patients testing negative for coronavirus and then testing positive — or people who are almost certainly infected who are testing negative.
It's definitely a lot higher:Chinese Cell phone Users:
November 2019 data: 1,600,957,000 users (1.6 billion)
March 2020 data: 1,579,927,000 users (1.57 billion)
Net Drop: 21.03 million
So from that data you think it's concrete proof that 21 million people have died. Right. Now consider:
China Population: 1,436,768,070 (1.43 billion) as of Jan 2020.
So even if every single person has a cell phone (even those in rural areas and all kids/infants), that's still 150 million more than the total population. The data actually represents the number of subscriptions cancelled due to the lockdown from migrant workers who cancelled their work region mobile subscriptions since they were quarantined at home, because the virus prevented them from returning to their workplace. So stop spreading bs conspiracy theories.
Fact Check: Did 21 million cell phones really disappear in China?
Did 21 million cell phones really disappear in China? Is China hiding actual coronavirus figures in their country? Check the facts regarding the viral rumour.www.republicworld.com
However, the death rate is definitely much higher than the reported figures since most people who die in their homes will not be tested before being cremated or buried, but this is true for all countries, I would imagine about 3-5x higher, but throwing around insane figures like 21 million is just plain irresponsible.
More on Italy with their high elderly population:Updated information on the mortality rate, and how and why it's so much higher for older people. The new buzzword is immunosenescence.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/30/what-explains-coronavirus-lethality-for-elderly/
Note that if you put the numbers together, you get an estimate of about 50% of infected people are asymptomatic. That's in close agreement with data from the Diamond Princess and Iceland (maybe they used those data to come up with their value, I don't know. But in any case, it's appearing increasingly likely. that about half of all infected people are asymptomatic. Not 80-90%., and not 5-10%, either.)
The numbers don't actually differ that much from those published more than a month ago, based on I think much of the same Chinese sample. But there is a good discussion here of how the immune system weakens with age.
Also, why is Italy's death rate so high?
With all due respect, that is not even remotely possible here. Roughly speaking, we just passed the 1 million test mark earlier this week. The mobile fraction would be 250 million people or so?The elderly with underlying medical conditions, i.e. "the most vulnerable in society" - the ones with the highest risk of dying or developing complications, should be in a "Stay at Home" lockdown. The rest of us can get tested, wear masks and get on with our lives & livelihood!
My theory is that the Chinese government wanted to show the world how effective their "Communist-style" lockdown was. They concealed their true statistics fooling other countries that they knew what they're doing. This is a nation that's hosting the 2022 Beijing Olympics where they'll be center stage.
Adjusting for demography and under-ascertainment, we estimate an infection fatality ratio of 0·66% (95% CrI 0·39–1·33).
In Belgium, older people that currently die in a care home and for whom the cause of death cannot be established, are counted as corona-deaths.Face it, all numbers are much lower than expected, it's not just a China problem. All governments around the world will be vastly underreporting cases, whether intentionally, or because it's pretty much impossible to accurately report on the exact number of cases.
Fauci poured cold water about widespread antibody testing in the press briefing. Said it was not a priority.
Guess that will be a job for the rest of the world.
There was a period of inertia for a 10 to 14 day period over XMAS/New Year when Chinese authorities dithered - The WHO and Government's knew about the COVID 19 virus before XMAS but chose to keep it confidential.
Very widespread testing is indeed the key here I think. In other countries, they're focusing on testing the people arriving at hospitals, so the comparison is hard to make. Perhaps better with S-Korea.Iceland continues to stand out--only two deaths in more than 1200 cases. Most of the cases are still open, but there have been 236 recoveries, and even using that for the mortality rate, which should give a gross overestimate, one gets a mortality rate of < 1.0%. A good part of the explanation is that they're testing everyone they can, so they're picking up a lot of asymptomatics. Even given that, the numbers are astonishing. An overall healthier population? Maybe older people are self-isolating better than in other parts of the world?